Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MAR-JAC POULTRY, INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of MAR-JAC POULTRY, INC. in 1020 AVIATION BLVD., GAINESVILLE, GA 30503 (NAICS 311615). OSHA activity number 341236206.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Mar-Jac Poultry, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Mar-Jac Poultry, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1020 AVIATION BLVD.
City
GAINESVILLE
State
GA
ZIP
30503
Mailing
PO BOX 1017, GAINESVILLE, GA 30503
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
311615
Employees
1112
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 D01

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Aug 1, 2016
Abate by
Aug 25, 2016
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE).  On 2/3/16, at the Gainesville facility, the employer did not perform an arc flash assessment to determine what personal protective equipment would be appropriate for protecting employees that were required to work on energized 480 volt circuits.    In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $6300
  • — Z (S) $6300

1910.335 A01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Aug 1, 2016
Abate by
Aug 25, 2016
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $5,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(I): Employees working in area where there were potential electrical hazards were not provided with and/or failed to use electrical protective equipment that was appropriate for the specific parts of the body that needed to be protected and for the work being performed:    On or about 2/3/16, at the Gainesville facility, an unqualified employee was exposed to electrical hazards as the employee was not provided with or failed to use appropriate electrical protective equipment while the employee worked on energized 480 volt circuits.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $5000
  • — C (S) $6300
  • — Z (S) $6300

1910.333 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Aug 1, 2016
Abate by
Aug 25, 2016
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $5,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.333(a)(1): Live parts to which an employee was exposed were not de-energized before the employee worked on or near them.     On 2/3/16, at the Gainesville facility, an employee was exposed to live parts operating at greater than 50 volts to ground which could have been de-energized but were not de-energized.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $5000
  • — C (S) $6300
  • — Z (S) $6300

1910.333 C02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Aug 1, 2016
Abate by
Aug 25, 2016
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $5,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.333(c)(2): The employer did not ensure that only qualified persons were working on energized circuits and that qualified persons were familiar with the proper use of special precautionary techniques, personal protective equipment, insulating and shielding materials, and insulated tools.    On 2/3/16, at the Gainesville facility, the employer allowed an employee to work on an energized electrical panel who did not meet the qualified person requirements of being capable of working safely on energized circuits, being familiar with the proper use of special precautionary techniques, and the use of insulated tools as evidenced by the employee creating an arc flash incident when he did not know the line side from the load side of a main disconnect breaker.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $5000
  • — C (S) $6300
  • — Z (S) $6300

1910.335 A02 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Aug 1, 2016
Abate by
Aug 25, 2016
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $5,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(2)(i): When working near exposed energized conductors or circuit parts, each employee did not use insulated tools or handling equipment when the tools or handling equipment might have made contact with such conductors or parts.    On 2/3/16, at the Gainesville facility, the employer did not require the use of an insulated screwdriver when an employee was allowed to work on an energized electrical panel containing 480 volt circuit breakers.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $5000
  • — C (S) $6300
  • — Z (S) $6300

1910.333 B02 II A

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
May 9, 2016
Abate by
Jun 3, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,500 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.333(b)(2)(ii)(A): Safe procedures for de-energizing circuits and equipment were not determined before circuits and equipment were de-energized.  On or about 11/11/2015, Maintenance Manager, Ray Mygrant performed maintenance work (ohm out) inside a 480 volt panel associated with the DAF unit in waste water treatment without using a written LOTO procedure to ensure that a lock placed on an upstream panel would be effective.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $4500
  • — Z (S) $4500

View Mar-Jac Poultry, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341236206.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.