Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SOLVAY SPECIALTY POLYMERS USA, LLC

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of SOLVAY SPECIALTY POLYMERS USA, LLC in 10 LEONARD LANE, WEST DEPTFORD, NJ 08086 (NAICS 325211). OSHA activity number 341238806.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Solvay Specialty Polymers USA, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Solvay Specialty Polymers USA, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
10 LEONARD LANE
City
WEST DEPTFORD
State
NJ
ZIP
08086
Mailing
10 LEONARD LANE, WEST DEPTFORD, NJ 08086
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
325211
Employees
156
Ownership type
A

13 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.119 D03 I D

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Aug 1, 2016
Abate by
Aug 22, 2016
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i)(D): Information pertaining to equipment in the process did not include relief system design and design basis:   a) D2 Vinylidene Fluoride Process (VF2):  The employer's process safety information for the relief system design basis was incomplete in that the flow capacity analysis failed to appropriately calculate the  sizing of the relief system by not including the Kc  value as required when using a rupture disc in combination with the pressure relief valve (PSV-20598A/B) per RAGAGEP such as, but not limited to, API 520 Part I, 2000, Section 3.11.2, on or about 2/9/16.   b) D2 Vinylidene Fluoride Process (VF2):   The employers process safety information for the relief system design basis was incomplete in that the inlet pressure loss calculation failed to include the pressure loss from the vessel (V-218A/B) to the inlet of the 3 pipe leading the 4 pressure relief valves (PSV-20945A/B & PSV-20948A/B), on or about 2/9/16.  NOTE: THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION FOR THIS ITEM. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1000.00 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $5000
  • — Z (S) $5000

1910.119 D03 I H

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Aug 1, 2016
Abate by
Aug 22, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i)(H): Process safety information pertaining to the equipment in the process did not include the safety systems:   a) D2 Vinylidene Fluoride Process (VF2):  The employer's process safety information did not include the design and design basis for safety systems, such as, but not limited to, HS-206100 the 200 area shutdown switch for the monomer distillation process, on or about 2/9/16.   NOTE: THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION FOR THIS ITEM. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1000.00 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.119 D03 II

Other-than-serious 4 instances 9 exposed
Issued
Aug 1, 2016
Abate by
Aug 22, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $6,500
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer did not document that equipment complied with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices:    c) D2 Vinylidene Fluoride Process (VF2): The employer failed to document that equipment complied with RAGAGEP, such as, but not limited to, API 520 part II 2003 sections 6.3.4(g) and 6.5. An administrative control or mechanical interlock was not provided for the three way safety relief valves, PSV-20945A/B, on V-218A, and PSV-20948A/B, on V-218B, to keep the valves from being positioned in the center, which would block flow to both relief valves, to ensure that the overpressure protection of the vessel was not compromised, on or about 2/9/16.     d) D2 Vinylidene Fluoride Process (VF2): The employer failed to document that equipment complied with RAGAGEP, such as, but not limited to, API 520 part II 2003 section 4.2.2. The analysis for PSV-20945A/B, on V-218A, and PSV-20948A/B, on V-218B, revealed inlet pressure losses in excess of 3% of set point, potentially compromising stable relief valve operation and adequate flow capacity, on or about 2/9/16.         NOTE: THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION FOR THIS ITEM. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1000.00 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $6500
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.119 E03 III

Other-than-serious 8 instances 9 exposed
Issued
Aug 1, 2016
Abate by
Aug 22, 2016
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $12,500
29 CFR 1910.119(e)(3)(iii): The process hazard analysis did not address engineering and administrative controls applicable to the hazards:    a) D2 Vinylidene Fluoride Process (VF2):  In the employer's 2011 PHA, the HAZOP did not list the safeguards in place for improper labeling of V-212 on P&ID F205 sheet 1(page 80 node 19), on or about 2/9/16.    b) D2 Vinylidene Fluoride Process (VF2):  In the employer's 2011 PHA, the HAZOP did not list the safeguards in place for high pressure due to failure of a check valve not holding downstream of DV-209 (page 84 node 20), on or about 2/9/16.    c) D2 Vinylidene Fluoride Process (VF2):  In the employer's 2011 PHA, the HAZOP did not list the safeguards in place for a compressor malfunction (page 85 node 20), on or about 2/9/16.    d) D2 Vinylidene Fluoride Process (VF2):  In the employer's 2011 PHA, the HAZOP did not list the safeguards in place for a deadleg located in line 20510 from V-213 to the air column (page 91 node 21), on or about 2/9/16.    e) D2 Vinylidene Fluoride Process (VF2):  In the employer's 2011 PHA, the HAZOP did not list the safeguards in place for a tube rupture in E-212 (page 102 node 24), on or about 2/9/16.    f) D2 Vinylidene Fluoride Process (VF2):  In the employer's 2011 PHA, the HAZOP did not list the safeguards in place for the manual valves to E 213.1 left open or by-passed (page 126 node 31), on or about 2/9/16.    g) D2 Vinylidene Fluoride Process (VF2):  In the employer's 2011 PHA, the HAZOP did not list the safeguards in place for out of service equipment including V 191 and related equipment for the 142b recovery (page 162 node 45), on or about 2/9/16.    h) D2 Vinylidene Fluoride Process (VF2):  In the employer's 2011 PHA, the HAZOP did not list the safeguards in place when an operator opens a by-pass around the condensate return valve on the re-boilers (page 174 node 47), on or about 2/9/16.          NOTE: THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION FOR THIS ITEM. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1000.00 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $12500
  • — C (S) $5000
  • — Z (S) $5000

1910.119 E05

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Aug 1, 2016
Abate by
Aug 22, 2016
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(e)(5): The employer did not establish a system to assure that the recommendations of process hazard analyses (PHAs) were resolved in a timely manner and that the resolutions were documented:  a) D2 Vinylidene Fluoride Process (VF2): The employer did not establish a system to assure that recommendations from the 2011 PHA were resolved and documented. Action item 1,365 which addressed the engineering analysis and included recommendations such as but not limited to, considering an interlock for P-230, investigating E230 control system for improved operation reliability and verifying the PSV setting is still valid at higher pump capacity, was marked as closed, but the employer could not confirm that all of the recommendations from the item were resolved, on or about 2/9/16.    NOTE: THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION FOR THIS ITEM. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1000.00 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $5000
  • — Z (S) $5000

1910.119 F01 I E

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Aug 1, 2016
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $12,500
29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(i)(E): The employer did not develop and implement written operating procedures that provided clear instructions for safely conducting activities involved in each covered process consistent with the process safety information that addressed the steps for each operating phase, including emergency operations:    a) D2 Vinylidene Fluoride Process (VF2): The employer's written operating procedures failed to provide clear instructions for emergency operations, including temperature maintenance of the VF2 storage tanks, V217 A/B and V218 A/B, during extended power outages where generators are not available, on or about 2/9/16.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $12500
  • — C (S) $5000
  • — Z (S) $5000

1910.119 F03

Serious Gravity 5 9 instances 9 exposed
Issued
Aug 1, 2016
Abate by
Aug 22, 2016
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $12,500
29 CFR 1910.119(f)(3): The operating procedures were not reviewed as often as necessary to assure that they reflected current operating practice, including changes that resulted from changes in process chemicals, technology, and equipment, and changes to facilities:    a) D2 Vinylidene Fluoride Process (VF2): Operating Procedures 6.1 Monomer Area Alarm Relief Interlocks incorrectly listed PSE 20123 and PSV 20123 as being a part of E231, the monomer reactor economizer's relief system, on or about 2/9/16.    b) D2 Vinylidene Fluoride Process (VF2): Operating Procedures 6.1 Monomer Area Alarm Relief Interlocks incorrectly listed PSV 21338 as being a part of C210, the acid absorber tails tower, on or about 2/9/16.    c) D2 Vinylidene Fluoride Process (VF2): Operating Procedures 6.1 Monomer Area Alarm Relief Interlocks incorrectly listed two PSVs 20618 on E216, the monomer column condenser, on or about 2/9/16.    d) D2 Vinylidene Fluoride Process (VF2): Operating Procedures 5.6 Caustic Scrubbing System incorrectly listed pH probe AE20398 as measuring the spent caustic in C206, the primary monomer scrubber, on or about 2/9/16.    e) D2 Vinylidene Fluoride Process (VF2): Operating Procedures 5.11 Monomer Column incorrectly listed C203, the lights column, as still in service, on or about 2/9/16.     f) D2 Vinylidene Fluoride Process (VF2): Operating Procedures 6.2 Operating Deviations incorrectly listed C203, the lights column, as still in service, on or about 2/9/16.    g) D2 Vinylidene Fluoride Process (VF2): Operating Procedures 5.12 Recycling Column incorrectly listed C203, the lights column, as still in service, on or about 2/9/16.    h) D2 Vinylidene Fluoride Process (VF2): Operating Procedures 6.1 Monomer Area Alarm Relief Interlocks incorrectly listed PAH-20749 on the distillation recycle column C204, set at 110 psig, on or about 2/9/16.    i) D2 Vinylidene Fluoride Process (VF2): Operating Procedures 6.1 Monomer Area Alarm Relief Interlocks did not list PAHH-20749 on the distillation recycle column C204, which is an interlock that activates an area shutdown switch, HS-206100, on or about 2/9/16.    NOTE: THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION FOR THIS ITEM. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1000.00 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $12500
  • — C (S) $5000
  • — Z (S) $5000

1910.119 J01 IV

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 9 exposed
Issued
Aug 1, 2016
Abate by
Aug 22, 2016
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $12,500
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(4)(i): The employer did not perform inspections and tests on process equipment:    a) D2 Vinylidene Fluoride Process (VF2): The employer did not inspect and test the high pressure alarm (PAHH) 20509, a control device, on the first stage suction pressure of compressor K-201, on or about 2/9/16.     b) D2 Vinylidene Fluoride Process (VF2): The employer did not inspect and test an emergency shutdown switch, HS-206100, for the 200 area monomer distillation process, on or about 2/9/16.    c) D2 Vinylidene Fluoride Process (VF2): The employer did not inspect and test a level control indicator (LIC-20607), a control device, on condenser E-214 for distillation column C-201, on or about 2/9/16.      NOTE: THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION FOR THIS ITEM. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1000.00 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $12500
  • — C (S) $5000
  • — Z (S) $5000

1910.119 J01 V

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 9 exposed
Issued
Aug 1, 2016
Abate by
Aug 22, 2016
Penalty
Initial $25,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(2): The employer did not establish written procedures to maintain the on-going integrity of process equipment:    a) D2 Vinylidene Fluoride Process (VF2): The employer did not establish written procedures to maintain the on-going integrity of a high pressure alarm (PAHH-20509), a control device, on the first stage suction pressure of compressor K-201, on or about 2/9/16.     b) D2 Vinylidene Fluoride Process (VF2): The employer did not establish written procedures to maintain the on-going integrity of an emergency shutdown switch, HS-206100, for the 200 area monomer distillation process, on or about 2/9/16.    c) D2 Vinylidene Fluoride Process (VF2): The employer did not establish written procedures to maintain the on-going integrity of a level indicator control (LIC-20607), a control device, on condenser E-214 for distillation column C-201, on or about 2/9/16.    d) D2 Vinylidene Fluoride Process (VF2): The employer did not establish written procedures to maintain the on-going integrity of C-112 the Drowning Tower, on or about 2/9/16.     NOTE: IN ADDITION TO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION, THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION FOR THIS ITEM. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1000.00 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19.     Solvay Specialty Polymers LLC USA was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1910.119(j)(2), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 925822, citation number 1, item number 4 and was affirmed as a final order on 2/21/14 with respect to a workplace located at 17005 State Route 7 Marietta, OH 45750.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (R) $25000
  • — Z (R) $25000

1910.119 L01

Other-than-serious 9 instances 9 exposed
Issued
Aug 1, 2016
Abate by
Aug 22, 2016
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $12,500
29 CFR 1910.119(l)(1): The employer did not establish or implement written procedures to manage changes to process chemicals, technology, equipment, and procedures, and changes to facilities that affect a covered process:    a) D2 Vinylidene Fluoride Process (VF2): The employer did not implement a management of change form for the discontinued use of the waste caustic discharge line, 20310, off of C-206, the primary monomer scrubber, on or about 2/9/16     b) D2 Vinylidene Fluoride Process (VF2): The employer did not implement a management of change form for the discontinued use of C203, the lights column, on or about 2/9/16.    c) D2 Vinylidene Fluoride Process (VF2): The employer did not implement a management of change form for the installation of HS100, the 200 Area Shut Down Switch, on the DCS, on or about 2/9/16.    d) D2 Vinylidene Fluoride Process (VF2): The employer did not implement a management of change form for the change in the testing procedure used for interlock ESS33214 for the gasholder compressor K-319, on or about 2/19/16.    e) D2 Vinylidene Fluoride Process (VF2): On or about 5/12/16 the employer did not implement a management of change form for FR-72094, the flow recorder measuring low temperature glycol flow to the header, when it was bypassed due to malfunctioning.    f) D2 Vinylidene Fluoride Process (VF2): On or about 5/14/16 the employer did not implement a management of change form  FR-20301, the flow recorder measuring low temperature glycol flow, when it was bypassed due to malfunctioning.    g) D2 Vinylidene Fluoride Process (VF2): On or about 4/22/16 the employer did not implement a management of change form FRC-20633, the flow recorder measuring well water flow to the C-205 tails tower, when it was bypassed due to malfunctioning.    h) D2 Vinylidene Fluoride Process (VF2): On or about 3/6/16 the employer did not implement a management of change form FRC-20633, the flow recorder measuring well water flow to the C-205 tails tower, when it was bypassed due to malfunctioning.    i) D2 Vinylidene Fluoride Process (VF2):  On or about 2/9/16 the employer did not implement a management of change form for an LEL detector in the discharge piping from the dryers to the atmosphere that did not accurately measure flammability, on or about 2/9/16.    NOTE: THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION FOR THIS ITEM. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1000.00 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (O) $12500
  • — C (S) $5000
  • — Z (S) $5000

1910.119 O04

Other-than-serious 3 instances 9 exposed
Issued
Aug 1, 2016
Abate by
Aug 22, 2016
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $12,500
29 CFR 1910.119(o)(4): The employer did not promptly determine and document an appropriate response to each of the findings of the compliance audit, and document that deficiencies had been corrected:    a) D2 Vinylidene Fluoride Process (VF2):The employer did not document an appropriate response for action number 2,551 from the 2014 compliance audit to consider how the site will make SOPs available when the network is down. The item was incorrectly marked as completed on 6/11/15 and was closed on 6/27/15, but was the system was not actually implemented until 4/5/16.    b) D2 Vinylidene Fluoride Process (VF2): The employer did not document an appropriate response and failed to take the recommended action to action number 2,541 from the 2014 compliance audit to review incidents from the 2011 process hazard analysis (PHA). The item was closed on 4/10/15, but no completed date was listed, on or about 2/9/16.    c) D2 Vinylidene Fluoride Process (VF2): The employer did not document an appropriate response and failed to take the recommended action to action number 2,544 from the 2014 compliance audit, which required the employer to review/update/locate paper files with resolution of older action items. The item was closed on 4/10/15, but no action was taken, on or about 2/9/16.     NOTE: THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION FOR THIS ITEM. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1000.00 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (O) $12500
  • — C (S) $5000
  • — Z (S) $5000

1910.119 D03 I B

Serious Gravity 5 9 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Aug 1, 2016
Abate by
Aug 22, 2016
Penalty
Initial $25,000 · Current $12,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i)(B): Written process safety information pertaining to the equipment in the process did not include piping and instrumentation diagrams (P&IDs).    a) D2 Vinylidene Fluoride Process (VF2): P&ID F-206 Sht. 1 incorrectly depicted line CMN-1"-Eb-20677 leading to TK-213, on or about 2/9/16.    b) D2 Vinylidene Fluoride Process (VF2): P&ID F-206 Sht. 1 does not depict which side of the three way valve leading to PSE20630 and PRV20630 for C-201 was car sealed closed, on or about 2/9/16.    c) D2 Vinylidene Fluoride Process (VF2): P&ID F-209 does not depict which side of the three way valve leading to PSE20947 A/B and PRV20947 A/B for V-218 was car sealed closed, on or about 2/9/16.    d) D2 Vinylidene Fluoride Process (VF2): P&ID F-209 does not depict which side of the three way valve leading to PSE20944 A/B and PRV20945 A/B for V218 A was car sealed closed, on or about 2/9/16.    e) D2 Vinylidene Fluoride Process (VF2): P&ID F-208 incorrectly depicted LAHH03 for V217A, on or about 2/9/16.    f) D2 Vinylidene Fluoride Process (VF2): P&ID F-207 Sht. 1 incorrectly depicted C-203, light column, as in service, on or about 2/9/16.    g) D2 Vinylidene Fluoride Process (VF2): P&ID F-209 incorrectly listed carbon steel for tank vent condenser E-223 A/B when it should have said stainless steel, on or about 2/9/16.     h) D2 Vinylidene Fluoride Process (VF2): P&IDF-205 Sht.1 incorrectly depicted two valves on DV-209 when there was only one, on or about 2/9/16.     i) D2 Vinylidene Fluoride Process (VF2): P&ID F-209 did not depict the drain valve on seal pot SP-221, on or about 2/9/16.    j) D2 Vinylidene Fluoride Process (VF2): P&ID F-209 incorrectly depicted the 4 inch valve for the level bridle on V-218A as CSO instead of the three inch valve from the monomer check tank pump P-216 A/B, on or about 2/9/16.     NOTE: IN ADDITION TO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION, THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION FOR THIS ITEM. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1000.00 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19.     Solvay Specialty Polymers, USA LLC was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1910.119 (d)(3)(i)(B)which was contained in OSHA inspection number 925822, citation number 1, item number 2 and was affirmed as a final order on 2/21/2014, with respect to a workplace located at 17005 State Route 7 South Marietta, OH 45750.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $12500
  • — C (R) $25000
  • — Z (R) $25000

1910.119 E03 I

Deleted Repeat Gravity 5 3 instances 9 exposed
Issued
Aug 1, 2016
Abate by
Aug 22, 2016
Penalty
Initial $25,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(e)(3)(i): The PHA did not address the hazards of the process:  a) D2 Vinylidene Fluoride Process (VF2):  The employer's 2011 HAZOP PHA did not address the impact of the loss of cooling for the V217 A/B and V218 A/B monomer storage tanks as the result of an extended power failure, on or about 2/9/16.  b) D2 Vinylidene Fluoride Process (VF2):  The employer's 2011 HAZOP PHA did not address failure of the DCS during a power outage due to the failure of the backup generator, on or about 2/9/16.  c) D2 Vinylidene Fluoride Process (VF2):  The employer's 2011 HAZOP PHA did not address the effects of the failure of the compressor, K201, during brief periods of power loss, on or about 2/9/16.   NOTE: IN ADDITION TO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION, THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION FOR THIS ITEM. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1000.00 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19.    Solvay Specialty Polymers, USA LLC was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1910.119(e)(3)(i) which was contained in OSHA inspection number 925822, citation number 1, item number 3a and was affirmed as a final order on 2/21/14, with respect to a workplace located at 17005 State Route 7 South Marietta, Ohio 45750.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (R) $0
  • — C (R) $25000
  • — Z (R) $25000

View Solvay Specialty Polymers USA, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341238806.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.