Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: CABOT LUMBER INC.

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of CABOT LUMBER INC. in 304 W. UNION, WEST LAFAYETTE, OH 43845 (NAICS 321920). OSHA activity number 341250397.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Cabot Lumber INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Cabot Lumber INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
CABOT LUMBER INC.
Site address
304 W. UNION
City
WEST LAFAYETTE
State
OH
ZIP
43845
Mailing
P.O. BOX 101, WEST LAFAYETTE, OH 43845
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
321920
Employees
8
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.22 B01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 21, 2016
Abate by
Apr 23, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $560 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.22(b)(1): Where mechanical handling equipment is used, sufficient safe clearances shall be allowed for aisles, at loading docks, through doorways and wherever turns or passage must be made. Aisles and passageways shall be kept clear and in good repairs, with no obstruction across or in aisles that could create a hazard.  a. In the pallet production area, employees are exposed to flying wood pieces while walking through the aisle between production equipment.   b. In the pallet production area, employees are exposed to tripping hazards while stepping over piles of wood in the aisle.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $560
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.95 C01

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 21, 2016
Abate by
Jul 29, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $840 Reduced

Hazardous substances 8111

29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1):     The employer shall administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program, as described in paragraphs (c) through (o) of this section, whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level (TWA) of 85 decibels measured on the A scale (slow response) or, equivalently, a dose of fifty percent. For purposes of the hearing conservation program, employee noise exposures shall be computed in accordance with appendix A and Table G-16a, and without regard to any attenuation provided by the use of personal protective equipment.    a. The employer had not developed and implemented a hearing conservation program for employees working throughout the facility in both production buildings. A laborer was exposed to continuous noise at 131.1% on March 3, 2016 which exceeded the action limit (AL) of 50%, an 8-hour TWA (time weighted average) sound level of 85 dBA. The employee's 8-hour TWA sound level was approximately 91.9 dBA during the 473 minute sampling period. Time weighted average includes a zero increment for the 7 minutes not sampled.    b. The employer had not developed and implemented a hearing conservation program for employees working throughout the facility in both production buildings. A laborer was exposed to continuous noise at 86.6% on March 3, 2016 which exceeded the action limit (AL) of 50%, an 8-hour TWA (time weighted average) sound level of 85 dBA. The employee's 8-hour TWA sound level was approximately 88.9 dBA during the 465 minute sampling period. Time weighted average includes a zero increment for the 15 minutes not sampled.    c. The employer had not developed and implemented a hearing conservation program for employees working throughout the facility in both production buildings. A laborer was exposed to continuous noise at 108.1% on March 3, 2016 which exceeded the action limit (AL) of 50%, an 8-hour TWA (time weighted average) sound level of 85 dBA. The employee's 8-hour TWA sound level was approximately 90.5 dBA during the 457 minute sampling period. Time weighted average includes a zero increment for the 23 minutes not sampled.    d. The employer had not developed and implemented a hearing conservation program for employees working throughout the facility in both production buildings. A laborer was exposed to continuous noise at 111.4% on March 3, 2016 which exceeded the action limit (AL) of 50%, an 8-hour TWA (time weighted average) sound level of 85 dBA. The employee's 8-hour TWA sound level was approximately 90.7 dBA during the 456 minute sampling period. Time weighted average includes a zero increment for the 24 minutes not sampled.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $840
  • — Z (S) $2400

1910.95 G01

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 21, 2016
Abate by
Jul 29, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 8111

29 CFR 1910.95(g)(1):     The employer shall establish and maintain an audiometric testing program as provided in this paragraph by making audiometric testing available to all employees whose exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels.    a. The employer did not provide audiometric testing for employees working throughout the facility in both production buildings. A laborer was exposed to continuous noise at 131.1% on March 3, 2016 which exceeded the action limit (AL) of 50%, an 8-hour TWA (time weighted average) sound level of 85 dBA. The employee's 8-hour TWA sound level was approximately 91.9 dBA during the 473 minute sampling period. Time weighted average includes a zero increment for the 7 minutes not sampled.    b. The employer did not provide audiometric testing for employees working throughout the facility in both production buildings. A laborer was exposed to continuous noise at 86.6% on March 3, 2016 which exceeded the action limit (AL) of 50%, an 8-hour TWA (time weighted average) sound level of 85 dBA. The employee's 8-hour TWA sound level was approximately 88.9 dBA during the 465 minute sampling period. Time weighted average includes a zero increment for the 15 minutes not sampled.    c. The employer did not provide audiometric testing for employees working throughout the facility in both production buildings. A laborer was exposed to continuous noise at 108.1% on March 3, 2016 which exceeded the action limit (AL) of 50%, an 8-hour TWA (time weighted average) sound level of 85 dBA. The employee's 8-hour TWA sound level was approximately 90.5 dBA during the 457 minute sampling period. Time weighted average includes a zero increment for the 23 minutes not sampled.    d. The employer did not provide audiometric testing for employees working throughout the facility in both production buildings. A laborer was exposed to continuous noise at 111.4% on March 3, 2016 which exceeded the action limit (AL) of 50%, an 8-hour TWA (time weighted average) sound level of 85 dBA. The employee's 8-hour TWA sound level was approximately 90.7 dBA during the 456 minute sampling period. Time weighted average includes a zero increment for the 24 minutes not sampled.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.95 K01

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 21, 2016
Abate by
Jul 29, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 8111

29 CFR 1910.95(k)(1):     The employer shall train each employee who is exposed to noise at or above an 8-hour time weighted average of 85 decibels in accordance with the requirements of this section. The employer shall institute a training program and ensure employee participation in the program.    a. The employer had not developed and implemented a hearing conservation training program for employees working throughout the facility in both production buildings. A laborer was exposed to continuous noise at 131.1% on March 3, 2016 which exceeded the action limit (AL) of 50%, an 8-hour TWA (time weighted average) sound level of 85 dBA. The employee's 8-hour TWA sound level was approximately 91.9 dBA during the 473 minute sampling period. Time weighted average includes a zero increment for the 7 minutes not sampled.    b. The employer had not developed and implemented a hearing conservation training program for employees working throughout the facility in both production buildings. A laborer was exposed to continuous noise at 86.6% on March 3, 2016 which exceeded the action limit (AL) of 50%, an 8-hour TWA (time weighted average) sound level of 85 dBA. The employee's 8-hour TWA sound level was approximately 88.9 dBA during the 465 minute sampling period. Time weighted average includes a zero increment for the 15 minutes not sampled.    c. The employer had not developed and implemented a hearing conservation training program for employees working throughout the facility in both production buildings. A laborer was exposed to continuous noise at 108.1% on March 3, 2016 which exceeded the action limit (AL) of 50%, an 8-hour TWA (time weighted average) sound level of 85 dBA. The employee's 8-hour TWA sound level was approximately 90.5 dBA during the 457 minute sampling period. Time weighted average includes a zero increment for the 23 minutes not sampled.    d. The employer had not developed and implemented a hearing conservation training program for employees working throughout the facility in both production buildings. A laborer was exposed to continuous noise at 111.4% on March 3, 2016 which exceeded the action limit (AL) of 50%, an 8-hour TWA (time weighted average) sound level of 85 dBA. The employee's 8-hour TWA sound level was approximately 90.7 dBA during the 456 minute sampling period. Time weighted average includes a zero increment for the 24 minutes not sampled.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Cabot Lumber INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341250397.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.