MIDLAND, TX —
OSHA Inspection: LUIS CERDA
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of LUIS CERDA in 2401 BRIAR OAKS CT. MIDLAND, TX, MIDLAND, TX 79701 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 341268324.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- LUIS CERDA
- Site address
- 2401 BRIAR OAKS CT. MIDLAND, TX
- City
- MIDLAND
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 79701
- Mailing
- 1714 S JEFFERSON, MIDLAND, TX 79701
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Apr 18, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,020 · Current $612 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets. Employees engaged in framing operations working below the framed structure were exposed to struck by hazards from debris from employees working above.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $612
- — Z (S) $1020
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Apr 18, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical agents. Employees engaged in roofing work were exposed to struck-by hazards while using electric circular saw without eye protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Apr 18, 2016
- Abate by
- May 12, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b). Employees engaged in residential framing construction activities were exposed to fall hazards in excess of six feet.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1680
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.602 C01 II
- Issued
- Apr 18, 2016
- Abate by
- May 12, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $1,440 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.602(c)(1)(ii): Modifications or additions which affect the capacity or safe operation of the equipment were made without the manufacturer's written approval: Employees engaged in framing activities were exposed to caught in and fall hazards while riding in the job made man basket on the front of a rough terrain forklift.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1440
- — Z (S) $2400
1926.602 D
- Issued
- Apr 18, 2016
- Abate by
- May 12, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $1,440 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.602(d): The employer did not certify that each operator had been trained and evaluated as required by paragraph 29 CFR 1910.178(l). Employees engaged in framing operations were operating a fork lift, without an operators certification, to lift other employees working from an elevated platform were exposed to caught-in and fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1440
- — Z (S) $2400
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Apr 18, 2016
- Abate by
- May 12, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed. Employees engaged in framing operations were exposed to fall hazards, in excess of nine feet, while using a ladder that was not extended at least three feet above the roof's landing.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $960
- — Z (S) $1600
More inspections at Luis Cerda
View Luis Cerda's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341268324.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.