ITHACA, NY —
OSHA Inspection: J&B CONSTRUCTION
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of J&B CONSTRUCTION in TEXAS ROADHOUSE PROJECT 719 SUITE 25, SOUTH MEADOW STREET, ITHACA, NY 14853 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 341288009.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- J&B CONSTRUCTION
- Site address
- TEXAS ROADHOUSE PROJECT 719 SUITE 25, SOUTH MEADOW STREET
- City
- ITHACA
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 14853
- Mailing
- 180 GALILEE ROAD, SMITHFIELD, NC 27577
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 10
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Oct 24, 2016
- Abate by
- Nov 10, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $400 · Current $400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: a) At the facility, on or about 10/24/2016: The employer did not provide abatement certification for Citation 1, Items 4a issued on April 5, 2016. An abatement demand letter was sent to the employer on August 9, 2016. Abatement documentation is required for this item.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $400
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Apr 5, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $364 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: a) At the jobsite, on or about 2/18/16: The Employer did not ensure that eye protection was worn by employees using pneumatic nail guns to sheathe a roof.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $364
- — C (S) $1600
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.304 H01
- Issued
- Apr 5, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $455 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.304(h)(1): Each circular crosscut table saw was not guarded by a hood which completely enclosed that portion of the saw blade above the table and that portion of the saw above the material being cut: a) At the jobsite, on or about 2/18/16: The employer did not ensure that a guard was used with a table saw that employees were using to cut dimensional lumber.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $455
- — C (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.451 C02 II
- Issued
- Apr 5, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $545 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(ii): Unstable objects were used to support scaffolds or platform units: a) At the west side of the jobsite, on or about 2/18/16: The Employer did not ensure that workers installing siding and working from a scaffold, that the scaffold was supported with stable objects.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $545
- — C (S) $2400
- — Z (S) $2400
1926.1053 B04
- Issued
- Apr 5, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladder(s) were used for purposes other than the purpose for which they were designed: a) At the west side of the jobsite, on or about 2/18/16: The Employer did not ensure that employees were using ladders as they were designed to be used.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.502 D15 II
- Issued
- Apr 5, 2016
- Abate by
- May 8, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $636 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15)(ii): Anchorages used for attachment of personal fall arrest equipment was not installed under the supervision of a qualified person. a) At the jobsite, on or about 2/18/16: The Employer did not ensure that workers were using personal fall protection equipment under the supervision of a qualified person. Abatement documentation must be submitted for this item.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $636
- — C (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.502 D16 III
- Issued
- Apr 5, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(16)(iii): Personal fall arrest systems, when stopping a fall, were rigged such that a employee could free fall more than 6 feet (1.8m) or contact a lower level: a) At the jobsite, on or about 2/18/16: The Employer did not ensure that workers were using a personal fall protection system that would limit the free-fall distance to under 6 feet and not prevent contact with the lower level.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at J&B Construction
View J&B Construction's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341288009.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.