Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ALBERTO CASTILLO

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ALBERTO CASTILLO in LOT 69 DERBYSHIRE DR, MARIETTA, GA 30064 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341300804.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Alberto Castillo — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Alberto Castillo is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ALBERTO CASTILLO
Site address
LOT 69 DERBYSHIRE DR
City
MARIETTA
State
GA
ZIP
30064
Mailing
1111 AMBER DR APT 706, NORCROSS, GA 30071
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 16, 2016
Abate by
Jun 28, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.  a) Lot 69, Derbyshire Dr. Marietta, GA: Employees installing roofing materials were exposed to eye injuries, in that; no protective eye wear was being used when operating Hitachi NV45AB2 1 ¾" strip nailers.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 16, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):    a) Lot 69 Derbyshire Dr. Marietta GA: An employee was exposed to a lower level fall hazard of approximately 11 1/2 feet, in that; no fall protection was being used.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.502 D

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 16, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.502(d): The employer used body belts as part of a personal fall arrest system:Note:  The use of a body belt in a positioning device system is acceptable and is regulated under paragraph (e) of this section.   a) Lot 69, Derbyshire Dr. Marietta, GA: Employees installing roofing materials were exposed to asphyxiation and fall hazards, in that; body belts were being used as part of a personal arrest system.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.502 D11

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 16, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(11): Lifelines were not protected against being cut or abraded:  a) Lot 69, Derbyshire Dr. Marietta, GA: Employees installing roofing materials were exposed to fall hazards, in that; lanyards for lifelines were not being protected from being cut or abraded by the rafter tie plates.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

View Alberto Castillo's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341300804.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.