WAUPACA, WI —
OSHA Inspection: WAUPACA FOUNDRY INC. (PLANT 2,3)
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of WAUPACA FOUNDRY INC. (PLANT 2,3) in 1955 BRUNNER DRIVE, WAUPACA, WI 54981 (NAICS 331511). OSHA activity number 341310167.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- WAUPACA FOUNDRY INC. (PLANT 2,3)
- Site address
- 1955 BRUNNER DRIVE
- City
- WAUPACA
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 54981
- Mailing
- 1955 BRUNNER DRIVE, WAUPACA, WI 54981
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 331511
- Employees
- 1100
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.1000 A02
- Issued
- Jul 29, 2016
- Abate by
- Nov 9, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,400 · Current $0 Reduced
0560
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1000(a)(2): Employee(s) were exposed to an airborne concentration of carbon monoxide listed in Table Z-1 in excess of the 8 hour Time Weighted Average concentration of 50 parts per million (ppm): At the VMM #6 machine of Plant 3, a VMM operator was exposed to carbon monoxide at a level of 61 ppm as an 8-hour TWA on March 31, 2016, approximately 1.2 times the PEL of 50 ppm. This exposure was determined by air sampling conducted over 487 minutes.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $3400
1910.1000 E
- Issued
- Jul 29, 2016
- Abate by
- Nov 9, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
0560
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1000(e): Feasible administrative or engineering controls were not determined and implemented to achieve compliance with the limits prescribed in 29 CFR 1910.1000(a) through (d): At the VMM #6 machine of Plant 3, a VMM operator was exposed to carbon monoxide at a level of 61 ppm as an 8-hour TWA on March 31, 2016, approximately 1.2 times the PEL of 50 ppm. This exposure was determined by air sampling conducted over 487 minutes. Applicable engineering or administrative controls may include, but are not limited to the following: 1) Conduct thorough air studies in the Plant 3 VMM areas to verify carbon monoxide sources, existing controls, employee proximity to sources and job tasks which expose employees in order to determine the most effective engineering and administrative controls. 2) Adjust fresh air supply system at slagging/ladle cleaning positions in order to bring clean fresh air as close to the employees' breathing zones as possible to reduce re-entrainment of carbon monoxide and other byproducts of the molten metal/pouring process. 3) Supplement engineering controls with administrative controls by reducing the amount of time employees are exposed to carbon monoxide while conducting job tasks with the highest exposure levels.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1048 N01
- Issued
- Jul 29, 2016
- Abate by
- Sep 7, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,550 · Current $1,000 Reduced
1290
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1048(n)(1): The employer did not ensure that all employees who were assigned to workplaces where there was exposure to formaldehyde participated in a training program: On or about March 9, 2016, the employer did not ensure that all employees who were assigned to workplaces where there was exposure to formaldehyde at or above 0.1 parts per million (ppm) participated in a formaldehyde training program: a) At the Core 31 machine in Plant 3 Core Room, a Core Room operator was exposed to formaldehyde at a level of 0.14 ppm as an 8-hour TWA on April 27, 2016. This exposure was determined by air sampling conducted over 511 minutes. b) At the Core 34 machine in Plant 3 Core Room, a Core Room operator was exposed to formaldehyde at a level of 0.23 ppm as an 8-hour TWA on April 27, 2016. This exposure was determined by air sampling conducted over 497 minutes. c) At the Core 13 machine in Plant 3 Core Room, a Core Room operator was exposed to formaldehyde at a level of 0.16 ppm as an 8-hour TWA on April 28, 2016. This exposure was determined by air sampling conducted over 491 minutes. d) At the Core 12 machine in Plant 3 Core Room, a Core Room operator was exposed to formaldehyde at a level of 0.40 ppm as an 8-hour TWA on April 28, 2016. This exposure was determined by air sampling conducted over 478 minutes. All provision of 29 CFR 1910.1048(n)(3)(i) through (vii) must be covered in a formaldehyde training program. Key elements include, but are not limited to the following: 1) Contents of formaldehyde standard 2) Signs, symptoms, and health effects of formaldehyde exposure 3) Reporting of issues to management 4) Description of formaldehyde sources, routes of entry and safe work practices 5) Review of spill and emergency procedures
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $1000
- — Z (S) $2550
1910.95 B01
- Issued
- Jul 29, 2016
- Abate by
- Jan 9, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $50,000 · Current $9,000 Reduced
8110
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(b)(1): When employees were subjected to sound exceeding those listed in Table G-16, feasible administrative or engineering controls were not utilized: a) In the Pattern Cleaning area of Plant 2, a Pattern Cleaner employee was exposed to noise at 1631% (noise dose) of the allowable noise dose of 100% during a sample period of 445 minutes during one shift on March 30, 2016. 1631% is equivalent to an 8-hour TWA sound level of 110.1 dBA. b) In the Shakeout area of Plant 3, a Shakeout employee was exposed to noise at 1567.2% (noise dose) of the allowable noise dose of 100% during a sample period of 489 minutes during one shift on March 31, 2016. 1567.2% is equivalent to an 8-hour TWA sound level of 109.8 dBA. c) In the Shakeout area of Plant 3, a Shakeout employee was exposed to noise at 1712.2% (noise dose) of the allowable noise dose of 100% during a sample period of 476 minutes during one shift on March 31, 2016. 1712.2% is equivalent to an 8-hour TWA sound level of 110.4 dBA. d) In the Shakeout area of Plant 3, a Shakeout employee was exposed to noise at 1777.0% (noise dose) of the allowable noise dose of 100% during a sample period of 480 minutes during one shift on March 31, 2016. 1777.0% is equivalent to an 8-hour TWA sound level of 110.7 dBA. e) In the Shakeout area of Plant 3, a Shakeout employee was exposed to noise at 1785.2% (noise dose) of the allowable noise dose of 100% during a sample period of 484 minutes during one shift on March 31, 2016. 1785.2% is equivalent to an 8-hour TWA sound level of 110.8 dBA. f) In the Shakeout area of Plant 3, a Shakeout employee was exposed to noise at 1621.6% (noise dose) of the allowable noise dose of 100% during a sample period of 485 minutes during one shift on March 31, 2016. 1621.6% is equivalent to an 8-hour TWA sound level of 110.1 dBA. g) In the Shakeout area of Plant 3, a Shakeout employee was exposed to noise at 2030.3% (noise dose) of the allowable noise dose of 100% during a sample period of 471 minutes during one shift on March 31, 2016. 2030.3% is equivalent to an 8-hour TWA sound level of 111.7 dBA. h) In the Shakeout area of Plant 3, a Shakeout employee was exposed to noise at 1872.7% (noise dose) of the allowable noise dose of 100% during a sample period of 473 minutes during one shift on March 21, 2016. 1872.7% is equivalent to an 8-hour TWA sound level of 111.1 dBA. i) In the Pattern Cleaning area of Plant 3, a Pattern Cleaner employee was exposed to noise at 792.1% (noise dose) of the allowable noise dose of 100% during a sample period of 490 minutes during one shift on May 4, 2016. 792.1% is equivalent to an 8-hour TWA sound level of 104.9 dBA. Applicable administrative or engineering controls may include, but are not limited to the following: 1. Conduct thorough noise studies in the Pattern Cleaning Areas (Plant 2 and Plant 3) and the Shakeout shacks (Plant 3) to verify noise sources, source noise frequencies, reflective surfaces and employee operations/positions for most effective engineering controls. 2. Pattern Cleaning (Plant 2 and Plant 3) i) Enclose the abrasive blasting of patterns and isolate the Pattern Cleaner employee from the noise generated during the abrasive blasting of patterns. ii) Relocate or redesign the Pattern Cleaning areas by eliminating or reducing the reflective surfaces, such as the cinderblock walls and low metal ceiling, in order to reduce the reverberant noise generated during the abrasive blasting of patterns. iii) Institute employee rotation or limit individuals' time at Pattern Cleaning to reduce the amount of time the operator is exposed to noise generated during abrasive blasting of patterns. 3. Shakeout i) Minimixe (to the extent possible) the fall height of castings at the transition from the high frequency screens to the sorting tables. ii) Line the underside of the sorting tables with damping material. iii) Increase the distance between employees and the high frequency screen. iv) Isolate the Shakeout employees from the noise generated by the high frequency screens and sorting tables. The Waupaca Foundry, Inc. (Plant 1) was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1910.95(b)(1), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1052486, citation number 1, item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on October 2, 2015, with respect to a workplace located at 406. Division Street, Waupaca, WI 54981. The Waupaca Foundry, Inc. (Plant 1) was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1910.95(b)(1), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 940732, citation number 1, item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on March 7, 2014, with respect to a workplace located at 406 N. Division Street, Waupaca, WI 54981.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $9000
- — Z (R) $50000
1910.1000 C
- Issued
- Jul 29, 2016
- Abate by
- Oct 7, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,000 · Current $0 Reduced
9010
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1000(c): An employee(s) was exposed to airborne respirable crystalline silica in excess of the 8-hour time weighted average limits of respirable crystalline silica listed in Table Z-3: At the South Oval position in Plant 2 Casting Processing area, the South Oval operator was exposed to airborne respirable crystalline silica at a level of 0.61 mg/m3 as an 8-hour TWA on March 30, 2016, approximately 1.9 time the PEL of 0.323 mg/m3. This exposure was determined by air sampling conducted over 451 minutes during one shift, with zero exposure being assumed for the unsampled 29 minutes of an 8-hour work shift. The Waupaca Foundry Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1910.1000(c), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 304011380, citation number 1, item number 1a and was affirmed as a final order on January 15, 2002, with respect to a workplace located at 1955 Brunner Drive, Waupaca, WI 54981.
Recent events (2)
- — I (R) $0
- — Z (R) $1000
1910.1000 E
- Issued
- Jul 29, 2016
- Abate by
- Oct 7, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9010
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1000(e): Feasible administrative or engineering controls were not determined and implemented to achieve compliance with the limits prescribed in 29 CFR 1910.1000(a) through (d): At the South Oval position in Plant 2 Casting Processing area, the South Oval operator was exposed to airborne respirable crystalline silica at a level of 0.61 mg/m3 as an 8-hour TWA on March 30, 2016, approximately 1.9 time the PEL of 0.323 mg/m3. This exposure was determined by air sampling conducted over 451 minutes during one shift, with zero exposure being assumed for the unsampled 29 minutes of an 8-hour work shift. Applicable engineering or administrative controls may include, but are not limited to the following: 1) Conduct thorough air studies in the Plant 2 Casting Processing Oval areas to verify airborne respirable crystalline silica sources including equipment and casting types that generate the most exposures. 2) Reduce the amount of adhered molding sand from castings through enclosed processes (such as cabinet blasting equipment) to reduce the amount of available silica to become airborne during transferring of castings. 3) Relocate fresh air supplies as close as possible to the employee's breathing zone to reduce the amount of re-entrained silica dust. The Waupaca Foundry Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1910.1000(e), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 304011380, citation number 1, item number 1b and was affirmed as a final order on January 15, 2002, with respect to a workplace located at 1955 Brunner Drive, Waupaca, WI 54981.
Recent events (2)
- — I (R) $0
- — Z (R) $0
More inspections at Waupaca Foundry INC. (Plant 2,3)
View Waupaca Foundry INC. (Plant 2,3)'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 331511)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341310167.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.