Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: AMERWAY, INC.

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of AMERWAY, INC. in 3701 BEALE AVENUE, ALTOONA, PA 16601 (NAICS 331491). OSHA activity number 341313278.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Amerway, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Amerway, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
AMERWAY, INC.
Site address
3701 BEALE AVENUE
City
ALTOONA
State
PA
ZIP
16601
Mailing
3701 BEALE AVENUE, ALTOONA, PA 16601
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
331491
Employees
30
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1025 E01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 1, 2016
Abate by
Feb 1, 2017
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,450 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1025(e)(1)(i): For any employees exposed to lead above the permissible exposure limit for more than 30 days per year the employer did not implement engineering and work practice controls (including administrative controls) were not implemented to reduce and maintain employee exposure to lead:      a)  Furnace Area, on or about April 14, 2016 - The employer did not implement engineering and work practice controls (including administrative controls) to reduce and maintain employee exposure to lead.  An employee designated as a Furnace Operator was exposed to lead at a time weighted average exposure of 74 micrograms per cubic meter of air, approximately 1.48 times the OSHA permissible exposure limit of 50 micrograms per cubic meter of air.  Sampling was performed by an OSHA compliance officer on April 14, 2016 for 447 minutes and zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled portion of the shift.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2450
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.1025 J01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 1, 2016
Abate by
Aug 6, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,450 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1025(j)(1)(i): The employer shall institute a medical surveillance program for all employees who are or may be exposed at or above the action level for more than 30 days per year:    a)  Furnace Area, on or about April 14, 2016, the employer did not institute a medical surveillance program for an employee designated as a caster who was exposed to lead above the action level.  OSHA air monitoring conducted on April 14, 2016 showed the caster was exposed to lead at a time weighted average exposure of 34 micrograms per cubic meter of air.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2450
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.1025 J02 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 1, 2016
Abate by
Aug 6, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,450 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1025(j)(2)(i):  The employer shall make available biological monitoring in the form of blood sampling and analysis for lead and zinc protoporphyrin levels to each employee covered under paragraph (j)(1)(i) of this section:      a)  Furnace Area, on or about April 14, 2016, the employer did not make biological monitoring in the form of blood sampling and analysis for lead and zinc protoporphyrin available to employees designated as casters who are exposed to lead above the action level.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2450
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 1, 2016
Abate by
Aug 6, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,450 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:    a)  In the Facility, on or about March 9, 2016 - The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to an employee who is required to use a tight fitting respirator in a regulated area within the workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2450
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.134 F02

Repeat Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 1, 2016
Abate by
Aug 6, 2016
Penalty
Initial $9,800 · Current $4,900 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2):  The employer did not ensure that an employee using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator is fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator is used, and at least annually thereafter:    a)  In the Facility, on or about March 9, 2016 - The employer did not provide a fit test to an employee who is required to use a tight fitting respirator in a regulated area within the workplace.        Amerway, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2), which was contained in OSHA inspection 315558668, citation number 1, Item 2b and was affirmed as a final order on November 8, 2011 with respect to a workplace located at 3701 Beale Avenue, Altoona, PA 16601.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $4900
  • — Z (R) $9800

1910.134 K

Repeat Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 1, 2016
Abate by
Aug 6, 2016
Penalty
Initial $9,800 · Current $4,900 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide annual training to employees who are required to use respirators:      a)  In the Facility, on or about March 9, 2016 - The employer did not provide respirator training to an employee who is required to use a tight fitting respirator in a regulated area within the workplace.      Amerway, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1910.134(k), which was contained in OSHA inspection 315558668, citation number 1, Item 2c and was affirmed as a final order on November 8, 2011 with respect to a workplace located at 3701 Beale Avenue, Altoona, PA 16601.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $4900
  • — Z (R) $9800

1910.1025 C01

Repeat Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 1, 2016
Abate by
Feb 1, 2017
Penalty
Initial $9,800 · Current $4,900 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1025(c)(1): Employee(s) were exposed to lead at concentrations greater than fifty micrograms per cubic meter of air averaged over an eight-hour period:      a)  Furnace Area, on or about April 14, 2016 - an employee designated as a Furnace Operator was exposed to lead at a time weighted average exposure of 74 micrograms per cubic meter of air, approximately 1.48 times the OSHA permissible exposure limit of 50 micrograms per cubic meter of air.  Sampling was performed by an OSHA compliance officer on April 14 2016 for 447 minutes and zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled portion of the shift.        Amerway, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1910.1025(c)(1), which was contained in OSHA inspection 315558668, citation number 1, Item 1a and was affirmed as a final order on November 8, 2011 with respect to a workplace located at 3701 Beale Avenue, Altoona, PA 16601.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $4900
  • — Z (R) $9800

1910.1200 F06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jul 1, 2016
Abate by
Aug 6, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the product identifier, signal word, hazard statement(s), pictogram(s) or precautionary statement(s):  a)  Plant Area, on or about March 9, 2016 - A holding tank of hydraulic oil was not labeled, tagged or marked with the product identifier and signal word or precautionary statement.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Amerway, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341313278.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.