OSHA Inspection: NANCY GARCIA

Issued

Jun 6, 2016

Abate by

Jun 10, 2016

Penalty

Initial $1,200 · Current $1,000 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.403(b)(2): Listed, labeled, or certified equipment was not installed and used in accordance with instructions included in the listing, labeling, or certification:    Construction Site: On or about March 21, 2016 and at times prior thereto; one employee was observed using a circular saw connected to a junction box that was not listed, labeled or certified. This condition exposed employees to an electrical shock hazard.

Issued

Jun 6, 2016

Abate by

Jun 10, 2016

Penalty

Initial $1,600 · Current $1,000 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system:      Construction Site: On or about 28, 2016 and at time prior thereto, one employee was observed working on the roof without any form of fall protection. This condition exposed the employee to a fall hazard greater than 6-feet to the ground below.

Issued

Jun 6, 2016

Abate by

Jun 23, 2016

Penalty

Initial $1,600 · Current $1,000 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:    Construction Site: On or about March 21, 2016 and at prior time thereto; the employer did not provide a training program to enable employees to recognize the hazards of falling. This condition exposed the employees to a fall greater than six feet to the ground below.

Issued

Jun 6, 2016

Abate by

Jun 10, 2016

Penalty

Initial $1,600 · Current $1,000 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:    Construction Site: On or about March 21, 2016 and at times prior thereto, one employee was observed using a ladder that did not extend 3-feet above the eave to again access and egress from the roof. This condition exposed the employee to a fall hazard greater than 6-feet to ground below.