Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: OLDS PRODUCTS CO. OF ILLINOIS

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of OLDS PRODUCTS CO. OF ILLINOIS in 10700 88TH AVENUE, PLEASANT PRAIRIE, WI 53158 (NAICS 311941). OSHA activity number 341395382.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Olds Products CO. of Illinois for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Olds Products CO. of Illinois is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
10700 88TH AVENUE
City
PLEASANT PRAIRIE
State
WI
ZIP
53158
Mailing
10700 88TH AVENUE, PLEASANT PRAIRIE, WI 53158
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
311941
Employees
75
Ownership type
Private (A)

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 2016
Abate by
Mar 20, 2017
Penalty
Initial $5,301 · Current $2,600 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures are not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:     (a) Written machine/equipment specific energy control procedures were not developed, documented, and utilized for authorized personnel to follow when performing maintenance, repair, set-up, cleaning and other associated mechanical diagnostic procedures on robotic equipment, automated picking equipment, conveyor filling lines, case packaging lines, and milling operations.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2600
  • · Z (S) $5301

1910.147 C06 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 2016
Abate by
Mar 20, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,180 · Current $1,450 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed:     (a) An annual/periodic inspection of the energy control procedures has not been conducted for, but not limited to robotic equipment, automated case packing line equipment, product filling line equipment, and milling operations to ensure that procedures and requirements of the standard are being followed and that employees who implement energy control procedures understand their application.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1450
  • · Z (S) $3180

1910.147 C07 I A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 2016
Abate by
Oct 28, 2016
Penalty
Initial $5,300 · Current $2,600 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(A): Authorized employee(s) did not receive training in the recognition of applicable hazardous energy sources, the type and magnitude of the energy available in the workplace, and the methods and means necessary for energy isolation:     (a) Training was not provided to affected employees such as case packaging operators and milling operators who are tasked with performing authorized employee lockout tagout work tasks. They were not trained to an authorized employee level in the recognition of hazardous energy sources, the type of energy sources to be encountered, and practices and methods required to safely deenergize machines/equipment, including but not limited to the filling lines, case packaging lines, milling operations and conveyors associated with production processes.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2600
  • · Z (S) $5300

1910.147 F03 II D

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 2016
Abate by
Oct 28, 2016
Penalty
Initial $5,300 · Current $2,600 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(f)(3)(ii)(D): Each authorized employee did not affix a personal lockout or tagout device to the group lockout device before working on the machine or equipment:    (a) On or about April 6, 2016: A material handling employee assisting in the Case Packaging Line No. 3 KUKA robotic Cell did not implement hazardous energy control methods to isolate robotic mechanical operations.    (b) On or about August 24, 2016: Case packing operators that perform cleaning of the case packaging lines do not apply a personal lock on the electrical circuit breaker locking device and pneumatic isolation valves prior to cleaning, exposing employees to hazardous energy sources.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2600
  • · Z (S) $5300

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 4 instances 40 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 2016
Abate by
Mar 20, 2017
Penalty
Initial $8,730 · Current $4,300 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Machine guarding was not provided to protect operator(s) and other employees from hazard(s) created by rotating parts and crushing hazards:    (a) Product Filling Line / Case Packaging Line No. 3:  Employees working on or around the in-feed and out-feed tail end of the conveyors associated with the product filling process and case packaging process were exposed to ingoing nip points and pinch points created by the conveyor belts, rollers and mechanical equipment.    (b) Product Filling Line / Case Packaging Line No. 2:  Employees working on or around the in-feed and out-feed tail end of the conveyors associated with the product filling process and case packaging process were exposed to ingoing nip points and pinch points created by the conveyor belts, rollers and mechanical equipment.    (c) Product Filling Line / Case Packaging Line No. 1:  Employees working on or around the in-feed and out-feed tail end of the conveyors associated with the product filling process and case packaging process were exposed to ingoing nip points and pinch points created by the conveyor belts, rollers and mechanical equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $4300
  • · Z (S) $8730

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 70 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 2016
Abate by
Oct 28, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,180 · Current $1,450 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employers shall develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met, and which also includes the following:     (a) The employer did not develop or implement a written hazard communication program where employees work with but not limited to ethyl alcohol, vinegar, mustard seed, oils and lubricants.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1450
  • · Z (S) $3180

1910.1200 H03 IV

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 70 exposed
Issued
Sep 12, 2016
Abate by
Oct 28, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv):   The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, did not include an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employee could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information:  (a) Employees are exposed to but not limited too ethyl alcohol, vinegar, mustard seed dust, oils and lubricants, and other materials used in manufacturing production operations and performance of maintenance work activities. Training was not provided regarding the new Global Harmonization (GHS) label elements (product identifier, signal word, pictogram, hazard statement(s), and precautionary requirements) and new safety data sheet (SDS) format.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

View Olds Products CO. of Illinois's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341395382.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.