Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,191,473Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-28 Last loaded 2026-07-31

OSHA Inspection: BIO-MED DEVICES, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of BIO-MED DEVICES, INC. in 61 SOUNDVIEW ROAD, GUILFORD, CT 06437 (NAICS 334510). OSHA activity number 341401701.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Bio-Med Devices, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Bio-Med Devices, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
61 SOUNDVIEW ROAD
City
GUILFORD
State
CT
ZIP
06437
Mailing
61 SOUNDVIEW ROAD, GUILFORD, CT 06437
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
334510
Employees
74
Ownership type
A

11 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 20, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer shall assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE). If such hazards are present, or likely to be present.    WORKSHOP:  The employer had not assessed the workplace to determine necessitate and appropriate types of personal protective equipment (PPE) for employees.      ABATED DURING THE INSPECTION
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.132 F01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 20, 2016
Abate by
Jul 8, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(f)(1): The employer shall provide training to each employee who is required by this section to use personal protective equipment (PPE).   WORKSHOP: The employees, required to wear personal protective equipment (PPE) were not provided with training and information on the Workplace Hazard Assessment for personal protective equipment (PPE).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.141 G02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 20, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced

Hazardous substances 15601730

29 CFR 1910.141(g)(2): Eating and drinking areas. No employee shall be allowed to consume food or beverages in a toilet room nor in any area exposed to a toxic material.    WORKSHOP:  Employees were allowed to consume water, coffee, and juices while handling chemicals, such as (but not limited to) alcohol, threadlocker, and methylene chloride.    ABATED DURNG THE INSPECTION
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 20, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are-barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices, electronic safety devices, etc.    WORKSHOP: The rotating chuck of the ENCO lathe was unguarded.        ABATED DURING THE INSPECTION
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 20, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): The point of operation of machines whose operation exposes an employee to injury, shall be guarded. The guarding device shall be in conformity with any appropriate standards therefor, or, in the absence of applicable specific standards, shall be so designed and constructed as to prevent the operator from having any part of his body in the danger zone during the operating cycle.    WORKSHOP:  The point-of-operation of the Supermax milling machine was unguarded.        ABATED DURING THE INSPECTION
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.215 A04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 20, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Work rests. On offhand grinding machines, work rests shall be used to support the work. They shall be of rigid construction and designed to be adjustable to compensate for wheel wear. Work rests shall be kept adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one-eighth inch to prevent the work from being jammed between the wheel and the rest, which may cause wheel breakage. The work rest shall be securely clamped after each adjustment. The adjustment shall not be made with the wheel in motion.      WORKSHOP:  The left abrasive wheel of the Grizzly bench grinder was not equipped with a work rest.      ABATED DURING THE INSPECTION
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1500
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.215 B09

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 20, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): Exposure adjustment. Safety guards of the types described in Subparagraphs (3) and (4) of this paragraph, where the operator stands in front of the opening, shall be constructed so that the peripheral protecting member can be adjusted to the constantly decreasing diameter of the wheel. The maximum angular exposure above the horizontal plane of the wheel spindle as specified in paragraphs (b)(3) and (4) of this section shall never be exceeded, and the distance between the wheel periphery and the adjustable tongue or the end of the peripheral member at the top shall never exceed one-fourth inch. (See Figures O-18, O-19, O-20, O-21, O-22, and O-23.)  WORKSHOP:  The left abrasive wheel of the Grizzly bench grinder was not equipped with a tongue guard.      ABATED DURING THE INSPECTION
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.304 F01 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 20, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.304(f)(1)(iv): Overcurrent devices shall be readily accessible to each employee or authorized building management personnel. These overcurrent devices may not be located where they will be exposed to physical damage or in the vicinity of easily ignitable material.    WORKSHOP:  The EP-6 electrical panel having built-in overcurrent protection devices was blocked with a recycle bin left/stored under the panel.      ABATED DURING THE INSPECTION
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 20, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employers shall develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, material safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met.    WORKSHOP:  The employer had not established and implemented a written hazard communication program including the Globalized Harmonized System where employees were required to work with chemicals, such as (but not limited to) alcohol, threadlocker and methylene chloride.        ABATED DURING THE INSPECTION
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1500
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 20, 2016
Abate by
Jul 8, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employers shall provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new physical or health hazard the employees have not previously been trained about is introduced into their work area. Information and training may be designed to cover categories of hazards (e.g., flammability, carcinogenicity) or specific chemicals. Chemical-specific information must always be available through labels and safety data sheets.  WORKSHOP:  The employees, required to work with chemicals, such as (but not limited to) alcohols, threadlocker, and methylene chloride were not provided with training and information in the chemical hazard communications.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.157 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
May 20, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(1): The employer shall be responsible for the inspection, maintenance and testing of all portable fire extinguishers in the workplace.  WORKSHOP:  The following fire extinguishers were blocked and not inspected:    1.  ABC portable fire extinguisher.        2.  ABC portable fire extinguisher in the office kitchen.    ABATED DURING THE INSPECTION
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341401701.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.