Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,124Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-25 Last loaded 2026-08-28

OSHA Inspection: A-BRITE PLATING COMPANY

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of A-BRITE PLATING COMPANY in 3000 W. 121ST STREET, CLEVELAND, OH 44111 (NAICS 332813). OSHA activity number 341405850.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch A-Brite Plating Company for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for A-Brite Plating Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3000 W. 121ST STREET
City
CLEVELAND
State
OH
ZIP
44111
Mailing
5245 BURKE STREET N9A 613 WINDSOR, ONTARIO
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332813
Employees
2400
Ownership type
Private (A)

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.22 B01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Sep 8, 2016
Abate by
Oct 4, 2016
Penalty
Initial $10,689 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.22(b)(1): Aisles and passageways were not kept clear and in good repair, with no obstruction across or in aisles that could create a hazard.  On or about April 11, 2016, the employer did not ensure there was sufficient safe clearance in the B-line aisle way at the rack conveyor auto transfer point.  B-line machine operators were exposed to struck-by hazards when the B-line plating racks were automatically conveyed across the aisle way.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $10689
  • · Z (S) $10689

1910.135 A01

Other-than-serious 3 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 8, 2016
Abate by
Oct 4, 2016
Penalty
Initial $10,689 · Current $10,058 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.135(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee wear a protective helmet when working in areas where there is a potential for injury to the head from falling objects:    On or about April 11, 2016, the employer did not ensure protective helmets were provided to employees working in areas around the A, B and Hoist plating lines rack conveyors.  Employees are exposed to potential head injuries from parts and/or racks falling from the A, B and Hoist line rack conveyers.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $10058
  • · C (S) $10689
  • · Z (S) $10689

1910.146 C02

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 60 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Sep 8, 2016
Abate by
Oct 4, 2016
Penalty
Initial $8,908 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(2): The employer did not inform exposed employees, by posting danger signs or by any other equally effective means, of the existence and location of and the danger posed by the permit spaces:  On or about April 11, 2016, the employer did not inform employees, by posting danger signs or other equally effective means, that work near and enter the A-line and B-line plating process tanks of the existence, location, and danger posed by the permit required spaces.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $8908
  • · Z (S) $8908

1910.146 E01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 60 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Sep 8, 2016
Abate by
Oct 4, 2016
Penalty
Initial $8,908 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.146(e)(1): Before entry was authorized, the employer did not document the completion of measures required by 29 CFR 1910.146(d)(3) by preparing an entry permit:   On or about April 11, 2016, before allowing employees and supervisors to enter the A and B line plating process tanks the employer did not document the completion of a confined space entry permit to ensure the means, procedures, and practices necessary for safe permit required confined space entry operations were implemented.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $8908
  • · Z (S) $8908

1910.146 G01

Serious Gravity 5 60 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Sep 8, 2016
Abate by
Oct 4, 2016
Penalty
Initial $8,908 · Current $10,058
29 CFR 1910.146(g)(1): The employer did not provide training so that all employees whose work was regulated by 29 CFR 1910.146 (permit required confined spaces) acquired the understanding, knowledge, and skills necessary for the safe performance of the duties assigned under 29 CFR 1910.146:     On or about April 11, 2016, the employer did not provide training to employees and supervisors in the understanding, knowledge, and skills necessary for the safe performance of duties when entering and working inside the A and B line plating process tanks.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $10058
  • · C (S) $8908
  • · Z (S) $8908

1910.147 C04 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 8, 2016
Penalty
Initial $12,471 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:   On or about March 14, 2016, the employer did not ensure employees were utilizing the procedures for the safe application, usage, and removal of energy controls while clearing a jammed parts rack that had fallen into a plating process tank on the B plating line.  Energy sources include, but not limited to; electric power.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $12471
  • · Z (S) $12471

1910.147 D

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 8, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(d): The established procedure for the application of energy control (the lockout or tagout procedures) did not cover the actions listed in and was not done in sequence as required by 29 CFR 1910.147(d)(1)-(6):     On or about March 14, 2016, a machine operator was exposed to machine hazards associated with the unexpected energization of moving parts during the clearing of a jammed parts rack that had fallen into a plating process tank on the B plating line.  The employer did not ensure the machine operator implemented energy control procedures by affixing a lockout device to the electrical energy isolation device [per the 1910.147(d)(4) requirements] and verified the isolation and deenergization of the machine had been accomplished [(d)(6)].
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.147 F03 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 8, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(f)(3)(i): A procedure was not utilized to afford the employees a level of protection equivalent to that provided by the implementation of a personal lockout or tagout device when servicing and/or maintenance was performed by a crew, craft, department or other group:   On or about March 14, 2016, a crew of employees were exposed to machine hazards associated with the unexpected energization of moving parts during the clearing of a jammed parts rack that had fallen into a plating process tank on the B plating line.  The employer did not ensure the crew implemented group energy control procedures by each employee affixing a lockout device to the electrical energy isolation device [per the 1910.147(f)(3)(ii)(D) requirements] and verified the isolation and deenergization of the machine had been accomplished [per the 1910.147(d)(6) requirements].  Energy sources include, but not limited to; electric energy.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.147 C06 I C

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 8, 2016
Penalty
Initial $12,471 · Current $10,058 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i)(C): Where lockout was used for energy control, the periodic inspection did not include a review, between the inspector and each authorized employee, of that employee's responsibilities under the energy control procedure being inspected:     On or about April 11, 2016, the employers periodic inspection of the energy control procedures did not include a review of each authorized employees responsibilities under the energy control procedures.  Authorized employees perform service and maintenance activities on the A, B, and Hoist plating process lines.  Energy sources include, but are not limited to; electrical, and/or kinetic (fluids) energy.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $10058
  • · C (S) $12471
  • · Z (S) $12471

1910.147 C07 I A

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 8, 2016
Penalty
Initial $12,471 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(A): Authorized employee(s) did not receive training in the recognition of applicable hazardous energy sources, the type and magnitude of the energy available in the workplace, and the methods and means necessary for energy isolation and control:   On or about March 14, 2016, the employer did not ensure machine operators clearing a jammed parts rack from inside the B plating line etch tank were trained in the methods and means necessary for energy isolation and control.   Energy sources include, but are not limited to; electrical power.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $12471
  • · Z (S) $12471

View A-Brite Plating Company's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341405850.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.