CONCORD, NH —
OSHA Inspection: FCL CONSTRUCTION INC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of FCL CONSTRUCTION INC in 20 N SPRING STREET, CONCORD, NH 03301 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341442507.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- FCL CONSTRUCTION INC
- Site address
- 20 N SPRING STREET
- City
- CONCORD
- State
- NH
- ZIP
- 03301
- Mailing
- 113 EVERIT AVE, FRAMINGHAM, MA 01702
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- May 25, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: a. Site- Employees working from the ground were not protected from over head struck by hazards where head protection was not worn.
Recent events (3)
- — C (S) $2000
- — R (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.451 E01
- Issued
- May 25, 2016
- Abate by
- Jun 1, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, sturcure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used: a. Site- Employees accessing a ladder jack scaffold were not protected from a fall hazard where a portable ladder was not provided to access the scaffold platform. Employees were using the ladders supporting the scaffold platform to access the scaffold by climbing over the scaffold platform.
Recent events (3)
- — C (S) $2800
- — R (S) $2800
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.452 K01
- Issued
- May 25, 2016
- Abate by
- Jun 1, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(k)(1): Ladder jack scaffold platforms exceeded a height of 20 feet (6.1 m) a. Site- Employees were not protected from a scaffold collapse hazard a ladder jack scaffold was erected approximately 24 feet off of the ground.
Recent events (3)
- — C (S) $2000
- — R (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- May 25, 2016
- Abate by
- Jun 1, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where (a) portable ladder(s) was/were used for access to an upper level landing surface and the ladder's length did not allow the ladder side rails to extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed, the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and/or a grasping device was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder: a. Site- Employees using an aluminum extension ladder to access a ladder jack scaffold platform were not protected from a fall hazard where the ladder extended less than one rung above the landing surface. The ladder was fully extended and did not have a grasping device provided to assist in mounting and dismounting the ladder.
Recent events (3)
- — C (S) $2000
- — R (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.1053 B09
- Issued
- May 25, 2016
- Abate by
- Jun 1, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(9): The area around the top and/or bottom of (a) ladder(s) was not kept clear: a. Site- Employees using an aluminum extension ladder to access a ladder jack scaffold were not protected from a trip hazard where the ladder erected on top of a wood pallet and bundles of shingles. Also there was debris and pneumatic hoses around the base of the ladder creating a trip hazard as employees mounted and dismounted the ladder.
Recent events (3)
- — C (S) $1600
- — R (S) $1600
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- May 25, 2016
- Abate by
- Jun 1, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $11,000 · Current $11,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: a. Site- Employees using pneumatic nail guns to install roof shingles and plywood were not protected from eye injuries where eye protection was not provided by the employer.
Recent events (3)
- — C (W) $11000
- — R (W) $11000
- — Z (W) $11000
1926.451 G01 I
- Issued
- May 25, 2016
- Abate by
- Jun 1, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $14,000 · Current $14,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(i): Each employee on a boatswains' chair, catenary scaffold, float scaffold, needle beam scaffold, or ladder jack scaffold was not protected by a personal fall arrest system: a. Site- Employees working from ladder jack scaffolds were not protected from a fall of approximately 24 feet where the employer failed to utilize personal fall arrest equipment.
Recent events (3)
- — C (W) $14000
- — R (W) $14000
- — Z (W) $14000
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- May 25, 2016
- Abate by
- Jun 1, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a. Site- Employees working from the roof were not protected from a fall between approximately 25 and 30 feet where employer chose not to use fall protection while working from the roof.
Recent events (3)
- — C (W) $0
- — R (W) $0
- — Z (W) $0
1926.502 D15
- Issued
- May 25, 2016
- Abate by
- Jun 1, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15): Anchorage used for attachment for personal fall arrest equipment was not capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee attached nor was it designed, installed and used as follows: As part of a complete personal fall arrest system which maintains a safety factor of at least two; and under the supervision of a qualified person: a. Site- Employees working from the roof and ladder jack scaffolding were not protected from a fall of approximately 25 feet while using personal fall arrest equipment. Employees wearing full body harnesses which were connected to lifelines with lanyards did not have adequate anchor points to arrest a fall. Lifelines for personal fall arrest systems where anchored to the peak of the roof by having a single nail driven through the core of the rope and into the ridge beam of the roof.
Recent events (3)
- — C (W) $0
- — R (W) $0
- — Z (W) $0
More inspections at FCL Construction INC
View FCL Construction INC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in NH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341442507.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.