Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: PIOLAX CORPORATION

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of PIOLAX CORPORATION in 139 ETOWAH INDUSTRIAL COURT, CANTON, GA 30114 (NAICS 326199). OSHA activity number 341484525.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Piolax Corporation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Piolax Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
PIOLAX CORPORATION
Site address
139 ETOWAH INDUSTRIAL COURT
City
CANTON
State
GA
ZIP
30114
Mailing
139 ETOWAH MEADOW PLACE, CANTON, GA 30114
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
326199
Employees
468
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 27, 2016
Abate by
Nov 23, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,543 · Current $2,725 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment was not used when necessary whenever hazards capable of causing injury and impairment were encountered.      On or about June 7, 2016:  An employee working in the Geomet lab area received chemical burns to his forearms while performing the QA process of cooking off the coating of small parts.  The employee was exposed to chemicals such as but not limited to sodium hydroxide. The employer did not provide personal protective equipment such as but not limited to protective sleeves to prevent chemical burns to the employee's arms.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2725
  • — Z (S) $4543

1910.133 A01

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 27, 2016
Abate by
Nov 23, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): Protective eye equipment was not required where there was a reasonable probability of injury that could be prevented by such equipment.   On or about June 7, 2016:  An employee working in the Geomet lab area received chemical irritation to his eyes while performing the QA process of cooking off the coating of small parts.  The employee was exposed to splash and vapor hazards from chemicals such as but not limited to sodium hydroxide. The employer did not provide personal protective equipment such as but not limited to chemical goggles to prevent chemical vapor irritation or injury to employee's eyes.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.151 C

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 27, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,543 · Current $2,725 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use.      On or about May 18, 2016:  Employees working in the Geomet lab area are exposed to corrosive chemicals such as but not limited to sodium hydroxide and boric acid.  The employer did not provide an emergency eyewash station in or near the area.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $2725
  • — Z (S) $4543

1910.157 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 27, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,543 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1): Portable fire extinguishers were not mounted, located and identified so that they were readily accessible without subjecting the employees to injuries.      On or about May 18, 2016:  Employees working in the Geomet lab area are exposed to fire and smoke hazards.  The employer did not ensure that the fire extinguisher was mounted, identified, and positioned so as not to cause injury to the employees.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $1000
  • — Z (S) $4543

1910.303 B02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 27, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,543 · Current $4,543
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2): Listed or labeled electrical equipment was not used or installed in accordance with instructions included in the listing or labeling.      On or about May 18, 2016:  Employees working in the Geomet lab area are exposed to electrical shock hazards where the relocatable power tap used with the electrical pump was not used as designed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $4543
  • — Z (S) $4543

1910.134 K06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 27, 2016
Abate by
Nov 23, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(6): The employer did not provide the basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134, in written or oral format to employees who wear respirators when such use was not required by the employer.   On or about May 18, 2016: Employees working in the Geomet area use N95 Respirators voluntarily.  The employees were not provided with proper information on the respirators to include but not limited to the limitations of the respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H02 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 27, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(2)(iii): The employer did not provide information to the employees as to the location and availability of the written hazard communication program, and material safety data sheets required by 29 CFR 1910.1200:   On or about May 18, 2016: Employees working in the Geomet area are exposed to chemicals such as but not limited to boric acid, Geomet coatings, thickener J, acetone, and sodium hydroxide.  The employees were not provided with information on the location and contents of the written hazard communication program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Piolax Corporation's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341484525.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.