ALPHARETTA, GA —
OSHA Inspection: EDUARDO LEAL
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of EDUARDO LEAL in 122 GRAND CRESCENT, ALPHARETTA, GA 30009 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 341528149.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- EDUARDO LEAL
- Site address
- 122 GRAND CRESCENT
- City
- ALPHARETTA
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 30009
- Mailing
- 3649 BUFORD HWY. APT. C2, ATLANTA, GA 30319
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Jun 16, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: (a) Townhome, upper roof: On or about June 6, 2016, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to struck-by hazards while using circular saws and pneumatic framing nail guns, in that protective eyewear was not provided to employees prior to using this equipment for framing and sheathing activities.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jun 16, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502: (a) Townhome, upper roof: On or about June 6, 2016, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards of 10 feet to the lower roof, in that a fall protection system was not provided to employees installing plywood sheathing on a 2/12 pitched roof.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Jun 16, 2016
- Abate by
- Jun 22, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: (a) Townhome, first floor (garage): On or about June 6, 2016, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards of 12-feet, 10-inches to the lower concrete surface, in that the side rails of the ladder did not extend at least 3-feet past the second floor landing. The ladder used to access the upper level did not reach the second floor which exposed employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.403 B01
- Issued
- Jun 16, 2016
- Abate by
- Jun 28, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.403(b)(1): Employer did not ensure that electrical equipment is free from recognized hazards that are likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees: (a) New townhome construction, front side: On or about June 6, 2016, and at times prior, the employer failed to inspect all of the electrical cords prior to the start of the work shift, in that extension cords hard torn outer casings and damaged strain relief and were not removed from service.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Eduardo Leal
View Eduardo Leal's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in GA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341528149.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.