Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: BINGHAMTON PRECAST & SUPPLY CORP.

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of BINGHAMTON PRECAST & SUPPLY CORP. in 18 PHELPS STREET, BINGHAMTON, NY 13901 (NAICS 327390). OSHA activity number 341563583.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Binghamton Precast & Supply Corp. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Binghamton Precast & Supply Corp. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
18 PHELPS STREET
City
BINGHAMTON
State
NY
ZIP
13901
Mailing
18 PHELPS STREET, BINGHAMTON, NY 13901
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
327390
Employees
100
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 27, 2016
Penalty
Initial $6,859 · Current $3,749 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9010

29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)  Employer did not establish nor implement a written respiratory protection program with worksite specific procedures when respirators were necessary to protect the health of the employee or whenever respirators were required by the employer:         a)  Outside Work Areas, on or about 6/17/16: Employer had not established a written respirator protection program when employees were required to wear dust masks and/or half face air purifying respirators.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $3749
  • — C (S) $6859
  • — Z (S) $6859

1910.134 C02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 27, 2016
Abate by
Nov 16, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9010

29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i): Respirator users were not provided with the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134 when the employer determined that any voluntary respirator use was permissible:    a) Outside Work Areas, on or about 6/17/16: Employer allowed voluntary use of dust masks and had not supplied employees with Appendix D of the respirator standard.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 D01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 27, 2016
Abate by
Nov 14, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9010

29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(ii): The employer did not select and use a NIOSH-certified respirator in compliance with the conditions of its certification:   a)  Outside Area, Back Pad Area, on or about 9/13/16:  The Dry Finisher was exposed to airborne respirable silica at a concentration of .690 mg/m3 time weighted average, 1.68 times the permissible exposure limit (PEL) of .41 mg/m3.  The PEL was based on 22% crystalline silica in the sample. The sample was collected on 9/13/16 for 223 minutes. Zero exposure was assumed for the 257 minutes not sampled. Employee was not wearing a one strap dust mask respirator that was not NIOSH approved.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 27, 2016
Abate by
Nov 16, 2016
Penalty
Initial $6,235 · Current $3,749 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9010

29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2):  Employer did not ensure that an employee using a tight fitting face piece respirator was fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator face piece (size, style, model or make) was used, and at least annually thereafter:      a)  Outside Areas, on or about 6/17/16: Employees required to wear half face air purifying respirator and N95 Dust Mask Respirators had not been fit tested.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $3749
  • — C (S) $6235
  • — Z (S) $6235

1910.134 G01 I A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 27, 2016
Abate by
Nov 14, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9010

29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A):  Tight fitting face piece respirators were worn when facial hair came between the sealing surface of the face piece and the face:      a)  Outside Area, South End, on or about 9/13/16: Employee had facial hair and was required to wear a N95 half mask dust respirator while grinding.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1000 C

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 27, 2016
Abate by
Dec 1, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9010

29 CFR 1910.1000(c):  Employees were exposed to materials in excess of the eight hour permissible exposure limit, listed in Table Z-3 of subpart Z of 29 CFR part 1910:    a) Outside Area, South End, on or about 9/13/16, a dry finisher grinding concrete was exposed to 1.25 milligrams per cubic meter (mg/m3) of airborne silica for a eight hour time weighted average (TWA) which was approximately 2.87  times the OSHA permissible exposure limit of .435 mg/m3. The sampling period was for 122 minutes. A zero increment is included for the 358 minutes not sampled. Employee was wearing a N95 Dust Mask Respirator.    b) Outside Area, Back Pad Area, on or about 9/13/16, a dry finisher grinding concrete was exposed to .690 milligrams per cubic meter (mg/m3) of airborne silica for a eight hour time weighted average (TWA) which was approximately 1.68 times the OSHA permissible exposure limit of .410 mg/m3. The sampling period was for 223 minutes. A zero increment is included for the 197 minutes not sampled. Employee was wearing a one-strap Dust Mask Respirator.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1000 E

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 27, 2016
Abate by
May 1, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9010

29 CFR 1910.1000(e):  Feasible administrative or engineering controls were not determined and implemented to achieve compliance with the limits prescribed in 29 CFR 1910.1000(a) through (d):    a)  Outside Area, South End, on or about 9/13/16:  Feasible administrative or engineering controls were not implemented to reduce employee exposure to silica below the OSHA Permissible Exposure Limit. Employee exposures as referenced in Citation 1  Item 3c.  b)  Outside Area, Back Pad Area, on or about 9/13/16:  Feasible administrative or engineering controls were not implemented to reduce employee exposure to silica below the OSHA Permissible Exposure Limit. Employee exposures as referenced in Citation 1 Item 3c.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 27, 2016
Abate by
Nov 16, 2016
Penalty
Initial $6,235 · Current $3,749 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9010

29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employees ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:     Note:  The employer may discontinue an employees medical evaluations when the employee is no longer required to use a respirator.        a) Outside Work Areas, on or about 6/17/16: Employees required to wear half face air purifying respirators and N95 Dust Mask Respirators and had not been provided with a medical evaluation.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $3749
  • — C (S) $6235
  • — Z (S) $6235

1910.134 K

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 27, 2016
Abate by
Nov 16, 2016
Penalty
Initial $6,236 · Current $3,749 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9010

29 CFR 1910.134(k)  The employer did not provide effective, comprehensive, understandable, and annual (or more often if necessary) training to employees who are required to use respirators:      a) Outside Work Areas, on or about 6/17/16: Employees required to wear half face air purifying respirators and N95 Dust Mask Respirators and had not received respirator training.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $3749
  • — C (S) $6236
  • — Z (S) $6236

View Binghamton Precast & Supply Corp.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341563583.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.