Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ALFREDO VENCES

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ALFREDO VENCES in 9107 BAYSHORE BEND, AUSTIN, TX 78726 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341564946.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Alfredo Vences — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Alfredo Vences is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ALFREDO VENCES
Site address
9107 BAYSHORE BEND
City
AUSTIN
State
TX
ZIP
78726
Mailing
329 GREEN VALLEY ROAD, BASTROP, TX 78602
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
8
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 1, 2016
Abate by
Jul 5, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazard of falling from the elevated forks of a forklift.    On or about June 20, 2016, an employee was standing on the forks of a Gradall 524 rough terrain, telescoping boom forklift while it was in motion and elevated to the roof of the residential home under construction up to approximately 20 feet high, exposing the employee to a fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.178 L

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 1, 2016
Abate by
Jul 18, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l): Operators were not trained in the safe operation of powered industrial trucks:  On or about June 20, 2016, an employee was operating a Gradall 524 rough terrain, telescoping boom forklift without receiving training from the employer, exposing employees to hazards such as, but not limited to being struck by the forklift and falling from the elevated tines of the lift.  In the alternative: 29 CFR 1926.602(d): The employer did not certify that each operator had been trained and evaluated as required by paragraph 29 CFR 1910.178(l):Note: The requirements applicable to construction work under paragraph (d) of this section are identical to those set forth at paragraph (l) of 29 CFR 1910.178.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 1, 2016
Abate by
Jul 5, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $600 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.    On or about June 20, 2016, two employees were using a hand held saw to cut tiles on the roof without eye protection, exposing the employees to the hazard of being struck by flying objects.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $600
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jul 1, 2016
Abate by
Jul 5, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):     On or about June 20, 2016, five employees were installing roofing tiles on the residential home under construction up to approximately 25 feet high without fall protection, exposing the employees to a fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jul 1, 2016
Abate by
Jul 5, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:    On or about June 20, 2016, five employees were utilizing a 12 foot telescoping ladder to access the lower roof of the residential home under construction without the ladder extending at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface, exposing the employees to a fall hazard up to approximately 10 feet high.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.1053 B19

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jul 1, 2016
Abate by
Jul 5, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(19): Single rail ladders were being used:  On or about June 20, 2016, five employees were using a job-made ladder that consisted of a 2" X 10" X 8' board that had make-shift rungs screwed into it to access the upper roof section of the residential home under construction, exposing the employees to a fall hazard of approximately 6 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Alfredo Vences's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341564946.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.