OSHA Inspection: SHOOTING GALLERY RANGE, INC.

Issued

Nov 30, 2016

Abate by

Mar 13, 2017

Penalty

Initial $4,988 · Current $1,995 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1591

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:    a) During shooting range cleaning, employees were required to wear a respirator and the employer did not have a written respiratory protection program or completed the elements that were required to be included. This violation was discovered on or about June 30, 2016.

Issued

Nov 30, 2016

Abate by

Mar 13, 2017

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1591

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(i): Selection of appropriate respirators was not based on the respiratory hazard(s) to which the worker was exposed and user factors that affect respirator performance and reliability:    a) During shooting range cleaning, employees were required to wear a respirator (N95 dust mask) and the employer did not select the appropriate respirator for the hazard. This violation was discovered on or about June 30, 2016.

Issued

Nov 30, 2016

Abate by

Mar 13, 2017

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:    a) During shooting range cleaning, employees were required to wear a respirator and the employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator. This violation was discovered on or about June 30, 2016.

Issued

Nov 30, 2016

Abate by

Mar 13, 2017

Penalty

Initial $4,988 · Current $1,995 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1591

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1025(c)(1): Employee(s) were exposed to lead at concentrations greater than fifty micrograms per cubic meter of air averaged over an eight-hour period:    a) In the lobby and range, an employee was exposed to lead at an 8-hour time weighted average (TWA) of 183 micrograms per cubic meter (ug/m3) of air, approximately 3.66 times the permissible exposure level of 50.0 ug/m3. Sampling was performed for 407 minutes.  Zero exposure was assumed for the 73 minute period not sampled. This violation was discovered on or about September 6, 2016.

Issued

Nov 30, 2016

Abate by

Mar 13, 2017

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1591

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1025(d)(2): An initial determination was not made to determine if any employee may be exposed to lead at or above the action level:    a) In the lobby and range, the employer did not do an initial determination to determine if any employee may be exposed to lead. This violation was discovered on or about June 30, 2016.

Issued

Nov 30, 2016

Abate by

Mar 13, 2017

Penalty

Initial $4,988 · Current $1,995 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1591

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1025(h)(1): All surfaces were not maintained as free as practicable of accumulations of lead:    a) On the squeegee handle in the gun range, 44.97um (micrograms) of lead was found. This violation was discovered on or about June 30, 2016.     b) On the Exit door handle inside the gun range, 21.905 um (micrograms) of lead was found. This violation was discovered on or about June 30, 2016.    c) On the counter by the computer, 6.62 um (micrograms) of lead was found. This violation was discovered on or about June 30, 2016.    d) On the counter by the register, 5.505 um (micrograms) of lead was found. This violation was discovered on or about June 30, 2016.    e) On the Microwave numbers/handle, 4.5445 um (micrograms) of lead was found. This violation was discovered on or about June 30, 2016.     f) On the refrigerator handle, 2.7005 um (micrograms) of lead was found. This violation was discovered on or about June 30, 2016.    g) On the water dispenser lever, 2.2395 um (micrograms) of lead was found. This violation was discovered on or about June 30, 2016.    h) On the Exit door handle between the lobby and the gun range, 1.6365 um (micrograms) of lead was found. This violation was discovered on or about June 30, 2016.

Issued

Nov 30, 2016

Abate by

Mar 13, 2017

Penalty

Initial $3,563 · Current $1,425 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1591

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1025(l)(1)(ii): The employer did not train each employee who is subject to exposure to lead at or above the action level, or for whom the possibility of skin or eye irritation exists, in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.1025:    a) In the workplace, employees were not provided with training regarding the lead in their work area. This violation was discovered on or about June 30, 2016.

Issued

Nov 30, 2016

Abate by

Mar 13, 2017

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1591

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1025(m)(1)(i): The employer did not comply with all the requirements of the Hazard Communication Standard for lead:    a) In the workplace, employer did not have a Hazard Communication Program. This violation was discovered on or about June 30, 2016.

Issued

Nov 30, 2016

Abate by

Mar 13, 2017

Penalty

Initial $2,850 · Current $1,140 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(i): The employer having employee(s) with occupational exposure as defined by paragraph (b) of this section did not establish a written Exposure Control Plan designed to eliminate or minimize employee exposure:    (a) At the workplace, there was not a written Exposure Control Plan where employees had occupational exposure to blood and other potentially infectious materials. This violation was observed on or about June 30, 2016.

Issued

Nov 30, 2016

Abate by

Mar 13, 2017

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(1)(i): The employer did not make available the hepatitis B vaccine and vaccination series to all employees who have occupational exposure:    (a) At the workplace, the hepatitis B vaccine and vaccination series was not made available to employees who had occupational exposure to blood and other potentially infectious materials. This violation was discovered on or about June 30, 2016.