WEST CHESTER, OH —
OSHA Inspection: DWYER COMPANIES, INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of DWYER COMPANIES, INC. in 6082 SCHUMACHER PARK DRIVE, WEST CHESTER, OH 45069 (NAICS 237990). OSHA activity number 341640316.
Watch Dwyer Companies, INC. — free
Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Dwyer Companies, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- DWYER COMPANIES, INC.
- Site address
- 6082 SCHUMACHER PARK DRIVE
- City
- WEST CHESTER
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 45069
- Mailing
- 6082 SCHUMACHER PARK DRIVE, WEST CHESTER, OH 45069
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 237990
- Employees
- 46
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.95 C01
- Issued
- Dec 1, 2016
- Abate by
- Jan 20, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $7,482 · Current $3,500 Reduced
81108111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.9(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent: The employer did not provide a hearing conservation program for employees who were exposed to daily noise levels above the OSHA Action Level of 85 dBA or 50% of the daily dose. (a) On August 10, 2016, an employee was exposed to an eight hour time weighted average (TWA) noise level of 88.3 decibels on the A scale (dBA) or 79.5% of the daily dose for the 440 minute sampling period with a value of zero added for the 40 minutes not sampled. (b) On August 10, 2016, an employee was exposed to an eight hour TWA noise level of 88.04 dBA or 76.2% of the daily dose for the 400 minute sampling period with a value of zero added for the 80 minutes not sampled. (c) On August 10, 2016, an employee was exposed to an eight hour TWA noise level of 86.9 dBA or 65.2% of the daily dose for the 415 minute sampling period with a value of zero added for the 65 minutes not sampled. (d) On August 10, 2016, an employee was exposed to an eight hour TWA noise level of 86.2 dBA or 58.8% of the daily dose for the 391 minute sampling period with a value of zero added for the 89 minutes not sampled. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence, or written records.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3500
- — Z (S) $7482
1910.133 B01
- Issued
- Dec 1, 2016
- Abate by
- Dec 13, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $7,482 · Current $3,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(b)(1): Protective eye devices did not comply with any of the ANSI consensus standards identified in 1910.6: (a) On August 10, 2016, an employee was observed wearing prescription eye glasses that were not compliant with ANSI Z-87.1, with side shields, in the work area. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence, or written records.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3500
- — Z (S) $7482
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Dec 1, 2016
- Abate by
- Jan 20, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $7,482 · Current $0 Reduced
15201620
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: (a) The written program did not contain provisions for medical evaluations of employees required to use respirators. (b) The written program did not contain fit testing procedures for tight fitting respirators. (c) The written respiratory protection program did not contain procedures for regularly evaluating the effectiveness of the program. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence, or written records.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $7482
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Dec 1, 2016
- Abate by
- Jan 20, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $7,482 · Current $0 Reduced
15201620
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: (a) The employer did not provide medical evaluations for employees who were required to wear Honeywell N99 model 7190 tight fitting facepiece respirators in the welding department. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence, or written records.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $7482
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Dec 1, 2016
- Abate by
- Jan 20, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $7,482 · Current $0 Reduced
15201620
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: (a) The employer did not provide fit testing for employees who were required to wear respirators, such as Honeywell N99 model 7190 tight fitting facepiece respirators, in the welding department. In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence, or written records.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $7482
More inspections at Dwyer Companies, INC.
View Dwyer Companies, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 237990)
Jul 16, 2026
Pacific Boring Incorporated · LATHROP, CA
Jul 16, 2026
H.B. Fleming, INC. · VERSHIRE, VT
Jul 10, 2026
White Construction LLC · HARTFORD CITY, IN
Jul 8, 2026
Whiting-Turner LCT2 Joint Venture · NAUGATUCK, CT
Jul 7, 2026
Shimmick Construction Company, INC · SAN LEANDRO, CA
More inspections in OH
Jul 17, 2026
Teknol, INC. · DAYTON, OH
Jul 16, 2026
Lippert · PAYNE, OH
Jul 16, 2026
Provia · SUGARCREEK, OH
Jul 16, 2026
Greenacres Foundation · CINCINNATI, OH
Jul 16, 2026
Whirlaway Corporation · WELLINGTON, OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341640316.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.