Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ORTA CONSTRUCTION

Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of ORTA CONSTRUCTION in 4313 TULLER ROAD, DUBLIN, OH 43017 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 341668044.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Orta Construction — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Orta Construction is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ORTA CONSTRUCTION
Site address
4313 TULLER ROAD
City
DUBLIN
State
OH
ZIP
43017
Mailing
585 CEDARWOOD ROAD, COLUMBUS, OH 43207
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Other (I)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
40
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.404 B01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Aug 26, 2016
Penalty
Initial $6,236 · Current $2,495 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.404(b)(1)(i): General. The employer shall use either ground fault circuit interrupters as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section or an assured equipment grounding conductor program as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(iii) of this section to protect employees on construction sites. These requirements are in addition to any other requirements for equipment grounding conductors.    a. The employer did not have GFCI or an assured ground program for flexible cords used on the jobsite, thereby exposing employees to an electrical hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2494.6
  • — Z (S) $6236

1926.404 F06

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Aug 26, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.404(f)(6): Grounding path. The path to ground from circuits, equipment, and enclosures shall be permanent and continuous.  a. The employer was using an extension cord to power the circular saw, the extension cord was missing the ground pin, thereby exposing employees to an electrical hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.405 A02 II I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 26, 2016
Penalty
Initial $8,730 · Current $3,492 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.405(a)(2)(ii)(I): Flexible cords and cables shall be protected from damage. Sharp corners and projections shall be avoided. Flexible cords and cables may pass through doorways or other pinch points, if protection is provided to avoid damage.  a. On August 2, 2016, on the west end of the second floor, employees were operating a circular was with a damaged flexible cord, thereby exposing employees to an electrical hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3492
  • — Z (S) $8730

1926.405 G02 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 26, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.405(g)(2)(iv): Strain relief. Flexible cords shall be connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief is provided which will prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws.  a. The extension cord used to energize the Makita circular saw on the west end of the second floor was not provided with strain relief, thereby exposing employees to an electrical hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 26, 2016
Penalty
Initial $6,236 · Current $2,494 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.  a. On August 2, 2016, employees were observed working on a second floor balcony without fall protection, thereby exposing the employees to a fall hazard of 12 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2494.4
  • — Z (S) $6236

View Orta Construction's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341668044.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.