Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: JOSEPH JENKINS

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of JOSEPH JENKINS in 41 PLEASANT VIEW DRIVE, NORTH PROVIDENCE, RI 02904 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341673960.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Joseph Jenkins — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Joseph Jenkins is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
JOSEPH JENKINS
Site address
41 PLEASANT VIEW DRIVE
City
NORTH PROVIDENCE
State
RI
ZIP
02904
Mailing
53 ADELAIDE ROAD, CHEPACHET, RI 02814
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 30, 2016
Abate by
Oct 17, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,116 · Current $4,116
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to struck-by hazards caused by a Laddervator roof shingle hoist which had a hoisting cable that was rusted, frayed, kinked and bent, and which was not set-up in a secure stable manner:  (a) Worksite:  On 8/5/2016, employees were exposed to struck-by hazards from working with or near an improperly maintained Laddervator roof shingle hoist with a rusted damaged cable. The equipment was not secured to prevent movement, and not set-up on a solid level surface.
Recent events (3)
  • — C (S) $4116
  • — J (S) $4116
  • — Z (S) $4116

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 30, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,116 · Current $4,116
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:   (a) Worksite - Ground level in front of house:  On or about 8/5/2016, employees were not protected from overhead hazards by protective helmets while working below roofers, and while operating a Laddervator.
Recent events (3)
  • — C (S) $4116
  • — J (S) $4116
  • — Z (S) $4116

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 30, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,116 · Current $4,116
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:  (a) Worksite - Roof:  On or about 8/5/2016, eye and face protective equipment was not used when employees were using pneumatic nail guns.
Recent events (3)
  • — C (S) $4116
  • — J (S) $4116
  • — Z (S) $4116

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Aug 30, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,940 · Current $2,940
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access:   (a) Worksite - Front of House:  On or about 8/5/2016, employees were not protected from falling while using a ladder that did not extend at least three feet above the upper landing surface.
Recent events (3)
  • — C (S) $2940
  • — J (S) $2940
  • — Z (S) $2940

1926.501 B13

Repeat Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Aug 30, 2016
Penalty
Initial $8,231 · Current $8,231
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employees provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b):   (a)  Worksite - Roof:  On or about 8/5/2016, employees were not protected from falling while working on a roof approximately seventeen feet above a lower level.  Jenkins Home Improvement was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard which was contained in OSHA inspection number 314919879, citation number 001, item number 01b and was affirmed as a final order on 12/5/2011, with respect to a workplace located at 90 Slade Street, Pawtucket RI, 02860.
Recent events (3)
  • — C (R) $8231
  • — J (R) $8231
  • — Z (R) $8231

1926.503 A01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Aug 30, 2016
Abate by
Oct 17, 2016
Penalty
Initial $330 · Current $330
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:   (a) Worksite:  On or about 8/5/2016, the employer did not provide adequate training for the employees who might be exposed to fall hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — C (O) $330
  • — J (O) $330
  • — Z (O) $330

View Joseph Jenkins's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341673960.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.