Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: AS PROFESSIONAL ROOFING CONTRACTORS LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of AS PROFESSIONAL ROOFING CONTRACTORS LLC in 2651 WELSCH DRIVE, SHILOH, IL 62269 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341678308.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch AS Professional Roofing Contractors LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for AS Professional Roofing Contractors LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2651 WELSCH DRIVE
City
SHILOH
State
IL
ZIP
62269
Mailing
9506 TREFORE AVE, SAINT LOUIS, MO 63134
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 7 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 29, 2016
Abate by
Jan 3, 2017
Penalty
Initial $300 · Current $300
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section.  a)  For Citation 1, Item 1a, issued on 9/30/2016 with an abatement date of 10/27/2016, the employer did not certify the complete abatement of the cited violation.  b)  For Citation 1, Item 1b, issued on 9/30/2016 with an abatement date of 10/27/2016, the employer did not certify the complete abatement of the cited violation.  c)  For Citation 1, Item 2a, issued on 9/30/2016 with an abatement date of 10/6/2016, the employer did not certify the complete abatement of the cited violation.  d)  For Citation 1, Item 2b, issued on 9/30/2016 with an abatement date of 10/6/2016, the employer did not certify the complete abatement of the cited violation.  e)  For Citation 1, Item 4, issued on 9/30/2016 with an abatement date of 10/27/2016, the employer did not certify the complete abatement of the cited violation.  f)  For Citation 1, Item 5, issued on 9/30/2016 with an abatement date of 10/6/2016, the employer did not certify the complete abatement of the cited violation.  g)  For Citation 1, Item 6, issued on 9/30/2016 with an abatement date of 10/27/2016, the employer did not certify the complete abatement of the cited violation.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $300

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 29, 2016
Abate by
Jan 3, 2017
Penalty
Initial $300 · Current $300
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer must submit to the Agency, along with the information on abatement certification required by paragraph (c)(3) of this section, documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.  For Citation 1, Item 3, issued on 9/30/2016 with an abatement date of 10/6/2016, the employer did not submit documents demonstrating complete abatement of the cited violation to OSHA.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $300

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 5 6 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2016
Abate by
Oct 27, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,940 · Current $2,940
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1):  The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part:    The employer did not initiate and maintain an accident prevention program to establish criteria for protecting employees from fall from heights and struck by hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2940

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 6 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2016
Abate by
Oct 27, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2):  The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s):    The employer did not maintain jobsite inspections that were performed by a person competent to ensure employees were not exposed to fall hazards and struck by hazards during construction operations.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2016
Abate by
Oct 6, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,352 · Current $2,352
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1):  Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:    Eye protective equipment was not used when employees were exposed to eye injury while using pneumatic nail guns.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2352

1926.102 A02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2016
Abate by
Oct 6, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(2): Eye and face protection required by this Part did not meet the requirements specified in American National Standards Institute, Z87.1-1968, Practice for Occupational and Educational Eye and Face Protection:  The employer did not ensure that employees working with or near pneumatically powered nail guns were wearing eye protection that met the requirements of ANSI Z87.1
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2016
Abate by
Oct 6, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,115 · Current $4,115
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m)  or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502:    The employer did not ensure fall protection was implemented during residential construction operations when workers were exposed to the hazard of falling approximately ten (10) feet off the roof eve when they were installing roof shingles.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4115

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2016
Abate by
Oct 27, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,940 · Current $2,940
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards:  The employer did not provide fall protection training to enable employees to recognize and control the fall hazards at their worksite while performing residential construction.  Employees were exposed to the hazard of falling approximately ten (10) feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2940

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2016
Abate by
Oct 6, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,940 · Current $2,940
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails do not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access:    The employer did not ensure portable ladders were constructed and placed so three (3) feet or more was extended above the upper landing.  Workers performing residential construction were exposed to falling approximately ten (10) feet while using an extension ladder to ascend/descend from the roof to the ground.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2940

1926.1060 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2016
Abate by
Oct 27, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,940 · Current $2,940
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize hazards related to ladders and stairways:    The employer did not train the employees to properly construct and place a ladder so it extended 36" or 3 rungs above the upper landing surface.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2940

View AS Professional Roofing Contractors LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341678308.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.