Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: DALLAS WASTE DISPOSAL AND RECYCLING, INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of DALLAS WASTE DISPOSAL AND RECYCLING, INC. in 3303 PLUTO STREET, DALLAS, TX 75212 (NAICS 562211). OSHA activity number 341684900.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Dallas Waste Disposal and Recycling, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Dallas Waste Disposal and Recycling, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3303 PLUTO STREET
City
DALLAS
State
TX
ZIP
75212
Mailing
3303 PLUTO STREET, DALLAS, TX 75212
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
562211
Employees
75
Ownership type
A

37 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 31, 2017
Abate by
Feb 27, 2017
Penalty
Initial $8,873 · Current $4,880 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer does not furnish to each of his employees employment and a place of employment which are free from recognized struck-by hazards that are causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to his employees:    (a) Employees operated a Mitsubishi powered industrial truck without the use of safety belts;    (b) Employees operated a Waldon 5100 loader having a seat belt that was cut off.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4880
  • — Z (S) $8873

1910.22 A01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 8 exposed
Issued
Jan 31, 2017
Abate by
Feb 27, 2017
Penalty
Initial $5,070 · Current $2,788 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(1): All places of employment, passageways, storerooms or service rooms were not kept clean and orderly or in a sanitary condition:    (a) Employees working near the plastic shredder were exposed to tripping hazards from cardboard boxes, plastic bins, metal objects, and other garbage that was placed in the work area;
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2788
  • — Z (S) $5070

1910.23 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 31, 2017
Abate by
Feb 27, 2017
Penalty
Initial $8,873 · Current $4,880 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1): Open-sided floors and/or platforms four feet or more above adjacent floor or ground level were not guarded with standard railings (or equivalent) and toeboards:    (a) Employees installing insulation on an upper landing approximately 8.5 feet above a lower level were not guarded with standard railing.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4880
  • — Z (S) $8873

1910.24 F

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jan 31, 2017
Abate by
Feb 27, 2017
Penalty
Initial $7,605 · Current $4,182 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.24(f): Stair Treads.  Rise height and tread width were not uniform throughout any flight of stairs including any foundation structure used as one or more treads of the stairs:    (a) Employees using a fixed stairway to access the sorting area are exposed to tripping hazards from non-uniform rise height and tread width.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4182
  • — Z (S) $7605

1910.24 H

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jan 31, 2017
Abate by
Feb 27, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.24(h): Standard railings were not provided on the open sides of all exposed stairways and stair platforms:  (a) Employees using fixed metal stairs to access the sorting lines were exposed to fall hazards from a section of missing handrails near the bottom end of the stairs.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.132 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 31, 2017
Abate by
Feb 27, 2017
Penalty
Initial $7,605 · Current $4,182 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE):    (a) The employer did not assess the workplace to determine what personal protective equipment is required when maintenance employees work adjacent to welding areas, exposing employee to eye burns from UV radiation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4182
  • — Z (S) $7605

1910.252 B02 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jan 31, 2017
Abate by
Feb 27, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.252(b)(2)(iii): Workers or other persons adjacent to the welding areas were not protected from the rays by noncombustible or flameproof screens or shields or by being required to wear appropriate goggles:  a) Maintenance Employees were exposed to eye burns while working near welding areas without being protected from ultraviolet radiation by using welding screens or shields or by wearing appropriate eye protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.146 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jan 31, 2017
Abate by
Feb 27, 2017
Penalty
Initial $8,873 · Current $4,880 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(1): The employer did not evaluate the workplace to determine if any spaces are permit-required confined spaces:    (a) Employer did not evaluate spaces to determine if permit required confined spaces
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4880
  • — Z (S) $8873

1910.146 C02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jan 31, 2017
Abate by
Feb 27, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(2): If the workplace contains permit spaces, the employer did not inform exposed employees, by posting danger signs or by any other equally effective means, of the existence and location of and the danger posed by the permit spaces:  (a) Maintenance employees entering permit required spaces on balers were exposed to crush-by hazards from moving parts and were not informed of the hazards by danger signs or any other equally effective means.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.146 C04

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jan 31, 2017
Abate by
Feb 27, 2017
Penalty
Initial $8,873 · Current $4,880 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(4): When the employer decided that its employees will enter permit spaces, the employer did not develop and implement a written permit space program that complies with 29 CFR 1910.146:    (a) The employer did not develop or implement a written permit space program, exposing maintenance employees entering permit required spaces on balers to crush-by hazards from moving parts.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4880
  • — Z (S) $8873

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jan 31, 2017
Abate by
Apr 11, 2017
Penalty
Initial $8,873 · Current $4,880 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:      (a) On or about August 2, 2016, the employer failed to develop, document, and utilize procedures for the control of potentially hazardous energy, exposing employees to amputation and crush-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4880
  • — Z (S) $8873

1910.147 C05 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jan 31, 2017
Abate by
Apr 11, 2017
Penalty
Initial $8,873 · Current $4,880 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(5)(i): Locks, tags, chains, wedges, key blocks, adapter pins, self-locking fasteners, or other hardware were not provided by the employer for isolating, securing or blocking of machines or equipment from energy sources:    (a) On or about August 2, 2016, the employer failed to provided locks for isolating, securing or blocking machines or equipment from energy sources, exposing employees to amputations and crush-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4880
  • — Z (S) $8873

1910.147 C05 II D

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jan 31, 2017
Abate by
Apr 11, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147 (c)(5)(ii)(D): Lockout devices and tagout devices did not indicate the identity of the employee who applied the device(s):      (a) On or about August 2, 2016, the employer failed to assure that tagout devices indicated the identity of the employee who applied the device, exposing employees to amputations and crush-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C07 I A

Serious Gravity 10 5 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Jan 31, 2017
Abate by
Apr 11, 2017
Penalty
Initial $8,873 · Current $4,880 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(A): Each authorized employee did not receive training in the recognition of applicable hazardous energy sources, the type and magnitude of the energy available in the workplace, and the methods and means necessary for energy isolation and control:    (a) On or about August 2, 216, the employer failed to provide each authorized employee with specific training on how to isolate and control sources of hazardous energy, including but not limited to hydraulic and electrical energy sources, exposing employees to amputations and crush-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4880
  • — Z (S) $8873

1910.147 D04 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jan 31, 2017
Abate by
Apr 11, 2017
Penalty
Initial $8,873 · Current $4,880 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(4)(i): Lockout or tagout devices were not affixed to each energy isolating device by authorized employees:    (a) On or about August 2, 2016, the employer failed to assure that lockout devices were affixed to all sources of hazardous energy, including but not limited to hydraulic and electrical sources, exposing employees to amputations and crush-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4880
  • — Z (S) $8873

1910.147 D05 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jan 31, 2017
Abate by
Apr 11, 2017
Penalty
Initial $8,873 · Current $4,880 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(5)(i): Following the application of lockout or tagout devices to energy isolating devices, all potentially hazardous stored or residual energy were not relieved, disconnected, restrained, and otherwise rendered safe:    (a) On or about August 2, 2016, the employer failed to assure that following the application of lockout or tagout devices to energy isolating devices, all potentially hazardous stored or residual energy are relieved, disconnected, restrained, and otherwise rendered safe, exposing employees to amputation and crush-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4880
  • — Z (S) $8873

1910.147 F01 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 31, 2017
Abate by
Apr 11, 2017
Penalty
Initial $8,873 · Current $4,880 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(f)(1)(ii): In situations in which lockout or tagout devices must be temporarily removed from the energy isolating device and the machine or equipment energized to test or position the machine, equipment or component thereof, employees were not removed from the machine or equipment area in accordance with paragraph (e)(2) of this section:    (a) On or about August 2, 2016, the employer failed to assure that employees are removed from the equipment in situations in which lockout or tagout devices must be temporarily removed from the equipment to test or position the equipment, exposing employees to amputations and crush-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4880
  • — Z (S) $8873

1910.147 F03 II D

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 31, 2017
Abate by
Apr 11, 2017
Penalty
Initial $8,873 · Current $4,880 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(f)(3)(ii)(D): Each authorized employee did not affix a personal lockout or tagout device to the group lockout device, group lockbox, or comparable mechanism when he or she begins work:    (a) On or about August 2, 2016, the employer failed to assure that each employee affix a personal lockout device to the group lockout device, exposing employees to amputations and crush-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4880
  • — Z (S) $8873

1910.178 L01 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Jan 31, 2017
Abate by
Apr 11, 2017
Penalty
Initial $8,873 · Current $4,880 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii): Prior to permitting an employee to operate a powered industrial truck (except for training purposes), the employer did not ensure that each operator has successfully completed the training required by this paragraph (l), except as permitted by paragraph (l)(5):    (a) Employees were permitted to operate forklifts without completing the required training, exposing employees to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4880
  • — Z (S) $8873

1910.178 L04 III

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Jan 31, 2017
Abate by
Apr 11, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not conducted at least once every three years:    (a) Employees operating forklifts were not certified at least every three years.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 M05 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 31, 2017
Abate by
Feb 27, 2017
Penalty
Initial $6,338 · Current $3,485 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(m)(5)(iii): When the operator of an industrial truck is dismounted and within 25 ft. of the truck still in his view, the load engaging means were not fully lowered, controls neutralized, and the brakes set to prevent movement:    (a)  This violation occurred on or about August 10, 2016 and at times prior thereto, when an employee using a forklift to add material to the international baler was observed dismounting the forklift and walking 15 feet to the baler without neutralizing the controls or setting the parking break.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3485
  • — Z (S) $6338

1910.178 P01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Jan 31, 2017
Abate by
Feb 27, 2017
Penalty
Initial $6,338 · Current $3,485 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): Powered industrial truck(s) found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe had not been  taken out of service until restored to safe operating condition(s):    (a) Employees operated forklift with damaged wheels, exposing employees to crush-by hazards form the forklift overturning.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3485
  • — Z (S) $6338

1910.178 Q07

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Jan 31, 2017
Abate by
Feb 27, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service, or were placed in service if the examination showed conditions adversely affecting the safety of the vehicle.  Such examinations were not made at least daily. Defects when found were not immediately reported and corrected:  (a) Employees did not perform daily examinations of forklifts and used forklifts containing defects, exposing employees to crush-by hazards from overturning forklifts.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.243 C03

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 31, 2017
Abate by
Feb 27, 2017
Penalty
Initial $8,873 · Current $4,880 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.243(c)(3): Abrasive wheels used on vertical portable grinder(s) (right angle head grinders) were not provided with safety guard(s) having a maximum exposure angle of 180 degrees and located between the operator and wheel:    (a) Employees were exposed to struck-by hazards while using an unguarded angle grinder while repairing a truck;      (b) Employees were exposed to struck-by hazards while using an unguarded angle grinder to repair the door on a truck.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4880
  • — Z (S) $8873

1910.244 A01 II

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 31, 2017
Abate by
Feb 27, 2017
Penalty
Initial $8,873 · Current $4,880 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.244(a)(1)(ii): Rated load(s) of portable jack(s) were not legibly and permanently marked in a prominent location on the jack(s) by casting, stamping, or other suitable means:    (a) Employees used an unrated shop-made jack while changing the transmission on a Mac truck, exposing employees to crushed-by hazards;    (b) Employees use unrated metal drums to hold up a Mac truck while performing maintenance, exposing employees to crushed-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4880
  • — Z (S) $8873

1910.244 A02 III

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 31, 2017
Abate by
Feb 27, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.244(a)(2)(iii): After the load has been raised, it was not cribbed, blocked, or otherwise secured at once:  (a) Employees replacing the transmission of a truck did not crib, block, or otherwise secure the load after it was raise, exposing the employees to crush-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.303 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 31, 2017
Abate by
Feb 27, 2017
Penalty
Initial $6,338 · Current $3,485 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2): Listed and labeled equipment was not installed and used in accordance with any instructions included in the listing and labeling.    (a) Electrical receptacle was being used not as listed and labeled exposing employees to electrical hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3485
  • — Z (S) $6338

1910.303 F02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 31, 2017
Abate by
Feb 27, 2017
Penalty
Initial $6,338 · Current $3,485 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(f)(2): Each service, feeder, and branch circuit, at its disconnecting means or overcurrent device, was not legibly marked to indicate its purpose, unless located and arranged so the purpose is evident:    (a) Employees were exposed to electrical hazards while using breakers to turn on/off lights that were not labeled.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3485
  • — Z (S) $6338

1910.303 G02 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 31, 2017
Abate by
Feb 27, 2017
Penalty
Initial $8,873 · Current $4,880 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(2)(i): Except as elsewhere required or permitted by Subpart S of Part 1910, live parts of electric equipment operating  at 50 volts or more were not guarded against accidental contact by use of approved cabinets or other forms of approved enclosures or by any of the means identified in paragraphs (A), (B), (C), and (D) of 29 CFR 1910.303(g)(2)(i):    (a) Employees were exposed to electrical hazards while using breakers to turn on/off lights that contained missing blanks.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4880
  • — Z (S) $8873

1910.305 B01 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Jan 31, 2017
Abate by
Feb 27, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,802 · Current $2,091 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(i): Conductors entering cutout boxes, cabinets, or fittings shall be protected from abrasion, and openings through which conductors enter were not effectively closed:    (a) Baler operators using the Galbreath baler were exposed to fire and electrical  hazards from damaged conduit entering the control panel.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2091
  • — Z (S) $3802

1910.305 G01 IV A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 75 exposed
Issued
Jan 31, 2017
Abate by
Feb 27, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,802 · Current $2,091 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(A): Flexible cords and/or cables were used as a substitute for the fixed wiring of a structure:    (a) Employees are exposed to electrical hazards from flexible wiring being used to supply power to permanent, overhead lighting.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2091
  • — Z (S) $3802

1910.305 G02 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 31, 2017
Abate by
Feb 27, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,802 · Current $2,091 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(ii): Flexible cords were not used only in continuous lengths without splice or tap:    (a) Employees were exposed to electrical hazards while using a portable fan having a spliced electrical cord.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2091
  • — Z (S) $3802

1910.305 G02 III

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Jan 31, 2017
Abate by
Feb 27, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(iii): Flexible cords and cables were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief is provided that will prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws:  (a) Employees were exposed to electrical hazards while using portable flood lights having a damaged strain relief where the wires enter the light fixture;  (b) Employees were exposed to electrical hazards from power cords of overhead fluorescent lights having a damaged strain relief.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.334 A02 I

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Jan 31, 2017
Abate by
Feb 27, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.334(a)(2)(i): Portable cord and plug connected equipment and flexible cord sets (extension cords) were not visually inspected before use on any shift for external defects (such as loose parts, deformed and missing pins, or damage to outer jacket or insulation) and for evidence of possible internal damage (such as pinched or crushed outer jacket):  (a) Employees were exposed to electrical hazards while using portable flood lights having a damaged flexible cord;  (b) Employees are exposed to electrical hazards from damaged flexible wiring being used to supply power to permanent, overhead lighting.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1904.29 B03

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 31, 2017
Abate by
Feb 27, 2017
Penalty
Initial $1,000 · Current $275 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.29(b)(3): Each recordable injury or illness was not entered on the OSHA 300 Log and on an incident report (OSHA Form 301or equivalent) within seven (7) calendar days of receiving information that a recordable injury or illness had occurred.      (a) The employer did not recorded an inpatient hospitalization per 1904.7(b)(5) on the OSHA 300 log, or equivalent, for calendar year 2016.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $275.16
  • — Z (O) $1000

1904.39 A02

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 31, 2017
Abate by
Feb 27, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.39(a)(2): Within twenty-four (24) hours after the in-patient hospitalization of one or more employees or an employee's amputation or an employee's loss of an eye, as a result of a work-related incident, the employer did not report the in-patient hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye to OSHA:  (a) Within 24 hours after the in-patient hospitalization of a work-related incident, the employer did not report the in-patient hospitalization to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $3500

1910.22 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jan 31, 2017
Abate by
Feb 27, 2017
Penalty
Initial $1,000 · Current $275 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.22(d)(1): In every building or other structure, or part thereof, used for mercantile, business, industrial, or storage purposes, the loads approved by the building official were not marked on plates of approved design and were not supplied and securely affixed by the owner of the building, or his duly authorized agent, in a conspicuous place in each space to which they relate.     (a) Employees are exposed to crushed-by hazards from equipment such as replacement parts for balers and air conditioning units, being stored on an unrated storage area above the break room and bathrooms.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $275.16
  • — Z (O) $1000

View Dallas Waste Disposal and Recycling, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341684900.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.