DALLAS, TX —
OSHA Inspection: DALLAS WASTE DISPOSAL AND RECYCLING, INC.
Referral inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of DALLAS WASTE DISPOSAL AND RECYCLING, INC. in 3303 PLUTO STREET, DALLAS, TX 75212 (NAICS 562211). OSHA activity number 341819845.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- DALLAS WASTE DISPOSAL AND RECYCLING, INC.
- Site address
- 3303 PLUTO STREET
- City
- DALLAS
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 75212
- Mailing
- 3303 PLUTO STREET, DALLAS, TX 75212
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 562211
- Employees
- 75
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
11 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.95 G01
- Issued
- Feb 1, 2017
- Abate by
- Apr 11, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $8,873 · Current $4,437 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(g)(1): The employer did not establish and maintain an audiometric testing program as provided by 29 CFR 1910.95(g) by making audiometric testing available to all employees whose exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels: (a) The employer had not established and maintained an audiometric testing program for an employee exposed to noise that had exceeded an 8-hour TWA of 85dBA, based on an 80 dB threshold. A loader employee was exposed to continuous noise levels at 125.2% of the permissible 8-hour TWA. The equivalent level of 125.2% is approximately 91.6 dBA. Sampling was performed for 138 minutes during one shift. Zero exposure was assumed for 342 minutes not sampled.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4436.5
- — Z (S) $8873
1910.95 K01
- Issued
- Feb 1, 2017
- Abate by
- Apr 11, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(k)(1): The employer did not train each employee who is exposed to noise at or above an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.95(k): (a) The employer did not train one (1) employee who is exposed to noise that had exceeded an 8-hour TW of 85 dbA, based on an 80dB threshold. A loader employee was exposed to continuous noise levels at 125.2% of the permissible 8-hour TWA. The equivalent level of 125.2% is approximately 91.6 dBA. Sampling was performed for 138 minutes during one shift. Zero exposure was assumed for 342 minutes not sampled.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Feb 1, 2017
- Abate by
- Apr 11, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $5,070 · Current $2,535 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: (a) The employer had not established and implemented a written respiratory protection program for at least one (1) employee who was required to wear a half mask elastomeric respirator during plastic shredding operations.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2535
- — Z (S) $5070
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Feb 1, 2017
- Abate by
- Apr 11, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: (a) Plastic shredding area, one (1) was using a respirator, such as but not limited to, half face piece elastomeric respirator.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Feb 1, 2017
- Abate by
- Apr 11, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: (a) Plastic shredding area, employees were using respirators, such as but not limited to, half face piece elastomeric respirators.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 K03
- Issued
- Feb 1, 2017
- Abate by
- Apr 11, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(3): Training was not provided prior to requiring employees to use a respirator in the workplace: (a) Plastic shredding area, one (1) was using a respirator, such as but not limited to, half face piece elastomeric respirator.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 K06
- Issued
- Feb 1, 2017
- Abate by
- Apr 11, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(6): The employer did not provide the basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134, in written or oral format to employees who wear respirators when such use was not required by the employer: (a)Baler near front office, one (1) employee was using a respirator, such as but not limited to, a N95 particulate respirator.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Feb 1, 2017
- Abate by
- Feb 28, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $5,070 · Current $2,535 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use: (a) Plastic shredding area, employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, and suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2535
- — Z (S) $5070
1910.1200 E01 I
- Issued
- Feb 1, 2017
- Abate by
- Apr 11, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $5,070 · Current $2,535 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i): At this establishment, the written hazard communication program, developed and implemented by this employer, did not include a complete list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present using an identity that was referenced on the appropriate safety data sheet. (a) Plastic Shredding Area, employees were using chemicals such as but not limited to, Dihydromyrcenol, Limonene, Benzaldehyde, Undecane, Alpha-Terpineol, Camphene, 2-(4-tert- Butyl benzyl) priopionaldehyde, 2-Butoxyethanol, which were not included on the chemical list.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2535
- — Z (S) $5070
1910.1200 G01
- Issued
- Feb 1, 2017
- Abate by
- Apr 11, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $5,070 · Current $2,535 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): The employer did not have a safety data sheet for each hazardous chemical in use: (a) Plastic shredding area, the employer did not have a safety data sheet for Dihydromyrcenol, Limonene, Benzaldehyde, Undecane, Alpha-Terpineol, Camphene, 2-(4-tert- Butyl benzyl) priopionaldehyde, 2-Butoxyethanol.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2535
- — Z (S) $5070
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Feb 1, 2017
- Abate by
- Feb 28, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $5,070 · Current $2,535 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: (a) Plastic Shredding Area, the employer did not provide effective information and training on hazardous chemicals for: Dihdromyrcenol, Limonene, Benzaldehyde, Undecane, Alpha-Terpineol, Camphene, 2-(4-tert- Butyl benzyl) priopionaldehyde, 2-Butoxyethanol.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2535
- — Z (S) $5070
More inspections at Dallas Waste Disposal and Recycling, INC.
View Dallas Waste Disposal and Recycling, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 562211)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341819845.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.