TAMUNING, GU —
OSHA Inspection: JEJOBELE CORPORATION
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JEJOBELE CORPORATION in 180 GUERRERO DR., TAMUNING, GU 96913 (NAICS 562920). OSHA activity number 341707453.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- JEJOBELE CORPORATION
- Site address
- 180 GUERRERO DR.
- City
- TAMUNING
- State
- GU
- ZIP
- 96913
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 10153, TAMUNING, GU 96931
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 562920
- Employees
- 13
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Sep 15, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,059 · Current $1,441 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: a) On August 18, 2016, the Gurutzpe metal lathe chuck area was not guarded to protect employees from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. b) On August 18, 2016, the Timemaster metal lathe chuck area was not guarded to protect employees from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. c) On August 18, 2016, the Lathe Machine No. 6,the chuck area was not guarded to protect employees from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. d) On August 18, 2016, the Craftsman drill press was not guarded to protect employees from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1441.3
- — Z (S) $2059
1910.303 F02
- Issued
- Sep 15, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,059 · Current $1,441 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(f)(2): Each service, feeder, and branch circuit, at its disconnecting means or over-current device, was not legibly marked to indicate its purpose, nor located and arranged so the purpose was evident. a) On August 18, 2016, on the West and North walls of the Machine Shop, the electrical panels were not marked or labeled to indicate its purpose.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1441.3
- — Z (S) $2059
1910.303 G01
- Issued
- Sep 15, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1): Sufficient access and working space was not provided and maintained about all electric equipment (operating at 600 volts, nominal, or less to ground) to permit ready and safe operation and maintenance of such equipment: a) On August 18, 2016, on the west wall of the metal fabrication area, access to two electrical controls panel was blocked with miscellaneous parts and debris.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.305 B01 II
- Issued
- Sep 15, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,059 · Current $1,441 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(ii): Unused openings in boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not effectively closed. a) On August 18, on the East wall of the machine Shop, two electrical control panels had unused openings on the side of cabinets, exposing employees to arc flash hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1441.3
- — Z (S) $2059
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Sep 15, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,817 · Current $1,272 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents. a) On August 18, inside the rollup garage entrance to the Speedway Machine Fabrication area, an employee was not wearing any eye or face protection while operating a handheld grinder to shape a metal object.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1271.9
- — Z (S) $1817
1910.212 B
- Issued
- Sep 15, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(b): Machine(s) designed for fixed location(s) were not securely anchored to prevent walking or moving: a) On August 18, 2016, in the Machine Shop fabrication area, a large metal lathe in operation was not bolted or secured to the floor.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Jejobele Corporation
View Jejobele Corporation's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 562920)
More inspections in GU
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341707453.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.