Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ULTIMATE DEVELOPMENT INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of ULTIMATE DEVELOPMENT INC. in LOT 13, CENTER VALLEY, PA 18034 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 341756070.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Ultimate Development INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Ultimate Development INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
LOT 13
City
CENTER VALLEY
State
PA
ZIP
18034
Mailing
65622 CASTOR AVENUE 2ND FLOOR, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19149
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.28 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 3, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,207 · Current $3,207
29 CFR 1926.28(a): Appropriate personal protective equipment was not worn by employee(s) in all operations where there was exposure to hazardous conditions:  a) Worksite - On or about August 31, 2016, employees were utilizing pneumatic nail guns without wearing any means of eye protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3207

1926.150 C01 VI

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 3, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,138 · Current $2,138
29 CFR 1926.150(c)(1)(vi): A fire extinguisher, rated not less than 10B, was not provided within 50 feet of wherever more than 5 gallons of flammable or combustible liquids or 5 pounds of flammable gas were being used on the jobsite.   a) Worksite - On or about August 31, 2016, the employer was storing approximately ten gallons of gasoline to refuel air compressors, but a fire extinguisher of the appropriate rating was not available within 50 feet of this location.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2138

1926.451 C02 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 3, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,672 · Current $2,672
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(iv): Front-end loaders and similar pieces of equipment were used to support scaffold platforms when they were not specifically designed by the manufacturer for such use.  a) Worksite - On or about August 31, 2016, employees engaged in framing work were using a variable reach rough terrain forklift with a job-built scaffold set on the forks as a means of access to the second floor.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2672

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 3, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section:  a) Worksite - On or about August 31, 2016, employees engaged in framing work were working from a scaffold approximately 11 feet above grade without utilizing any means of fall protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 3, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,741 · Current $3,741
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m)  or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502:   a) Worksite - On or about August 31, 2016, employees were engaged in residential framing work, approximately 18 feet above grade, were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3741

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 3, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,207 · Current $3,207
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet:   a) Worksite - On or about August 31, 2016, employees were using portable ladders for access that did not have their side rails extended at least three (3) feet above the upper landing surface.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3207

1926.1053 B05 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 3, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(5)(i): Non-self-supporting ladder(s) were not used at an angle such that the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder was approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder.   a) Worksite - On or about August 31, 2016, employees were using non-self-supporting ladders for access that were not set at an angle such that the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder was approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B16

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 3, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(16): Portable ladder(s) with structural defects, such as, but not limited to, broken or missing rungs, cleats, or steps, broken or split rails, corroded components, or other faulty or defective components, were not either immediately.  a) Worksite - On or about August 31, 2016, employees were using an aluminum extension ladder for second floor access which had multiple bent rungs and the base of the ladder had been cut off.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 3, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,138 · Current $2,138
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(13): The top or top step of a stepladder was used as a step.  a) Worksite - On or about August 31, 2016, employees performing frame carpentry work were working from the top step of a six foot stepladder.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2138

View Ultimate Development INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341756070.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.