HOUSTON, TX —
OSHA Inspection: INTERSTATE US AUTO INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of INTERSTATE US AUTO INC. in 4201 LANGLEY RD, HOUSTON, TX 77093 (NAICS 811121). OSHA activity number 341766608.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- INTERSTATE US AUTO INC.
- Site address
- 4201 LANGLEY RD
- City
- HOUSTON
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 77093
- Mailing
- 4201 LANGLEY RD., HOUSTON, TX 77093
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 811121
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Apr 19, 2017
- Abate by
- Apr 25, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $305 · Current $305
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: Citation 1 Item 1: 29 CFR 1903.19(c) Abatement certification was not provided by the employer. Citation 1 Item 2 a: 29 CFR 1903.19(c) Abatement certification was not provided by the employer. Citation 1 Item 2 b: 29 CFR 1903.19(c) Abatement certification was not provided by the employer. Citation 1 Item 3 a: 29 CFR 1903.19(c) Abatement certification was not provided by the employer. Citation 1 Item 3 a: 29 CFR 1903.19(d) Abatement documentation was not provided by the employer. Citation 1 Item 3 b: 29 CFR 1903.19(c) Abatement certification was not provided by the employer.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $305
1910.107 B05 I
- Issued
- Feb 15, 2017
- Abate by
- Mar 7, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $2,716
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(5)(i): The average air velocity over the open face of the booth (or booth cross section during spraying operations) was less than 100 linear feet per minute: On or about September 12, 2016 in the spray booth, an employee was exposed chemical vapors and mists while painting inside the spray booth when the blower motor was not operational.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2716
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Feb 15, 2017
- Abate by
- Feb 28, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,173 · Current $2,173
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: On or about September 12, 2016 in the spray area, an employee was exposed to respiratory hazards while wearing a 3M half face respirator without being medically evaluated.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2173
1910.134 K06
- Issued
- Feb 15, 2017
- Abate by
- Feb 24, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(6): The employer did not provide the basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134, in written or oral format to employees who wear respirators when such use was not required by the employer: On or about September 12, 2016 in the spray area, an employee was exposed to respiratory hazards while spray painting cars without being provided advisory information.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Feb 15, 2017
- Abate by
- Mar 14, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $2,716
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: On or about September 12, 2016 in the paint area, employees were exposed to chemical hazards while painting, buffing and sanding cars without the employer having a written hazard communication program.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2716
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Feb 15, 2017
- Abate by
- Mar 14, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: On or about September 12, 2016 in the paint area, employees were exposed to chemical hazards while painting, buffing and sanding cars without the employer having provided information and training on the hazardous chemicals in the work area.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Interstate US Auto INC.
View Interstate US Auto INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 811121)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341766608.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.