GROVE CITY, OH —
OSHA Inspection: MIGUEL HERNANDEZ
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MIGUEL HERNANDEZ in BUILDING 19 4814, 4818 AND 4822 SAINT ANDREWS DRIVE, GROVE CITY, OH 43123 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341775708.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MIGUEL HERNANDEZ
- Site address
- BUILDING 19 4814, 4818 AND 4822 SAINT ANDREWS DRIVE
- City
- GROVE CITY
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 43123
- Mailing
- 2953 LA VISTA DRIVE, COLUMBUS, OH 43204
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
1 citation on file for this inspection.
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Oct 18, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,272 · Current $2,272
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities six feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems: a. On or about September 15, 2016, each employee did not have adequate fall protection while performing roofing work. One employee was working without fall protection near the peak, exposing the employee to a fall hazard of approximately 25 feet. Another employee, who was working on a lower level roof, was utilizing an inadequate fall protection system, exposing the employee to a fall hazard of approximately 12 feet.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2272
More inspections at Miguel Hernandez
View Miguel Hernandez's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341775708.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.