Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: TURBO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of TURBO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. in 1500 1ST AVENUE, BEAVER FALLS, PA 15010 (NAICS 333112). OSHA activity number 341790798.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Turbo Technologies, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Turbo Technologies, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1500 1ST AVENUE
City
BEAVER FALLS
State
PA
ZIP
15010
Mailing
1500 1ST AVENUE, BEAVER FALLS, PA 15010
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333112
Employees
11
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.107 B09

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 28, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,138 · Current $1,604 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(9): A clear space of not less than 3 feet on all sides was not kept free from storage or combustible construction:  a)  Spray Booth Area, on or about September 22, 2016 - A clear space of not less than 3 feet on all sides of the spray booth was not kept free from storage in that wood was stored in the spray booth and flammable paints were stored adjacent to the booth.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1603.5
  • — Z (S) $2138

1910.107 G07

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 28, 2016
Abate by
Dec 2, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.107(g)(7):  "No Smoking" signs in large letters on contrasting color background shall be conspicuously posted at all spraying areas and paint storage rooms.   a)  Spray Booth Area, on or about September 22, 2016 - The employer did not post "No Smoking" signs at the spray booth area.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 28, 2016
Abate by
Dec 2, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,138 · Current $1,604 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  a)  In the Facility, on or about September 22, 2016 - The employer did not develop a written respiratory protection program with worksite specific procedures when the employer requires the use of respirators in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1603.5
  • — Z (S) $2138

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 28, 2016
Abate by
Dec 2, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:   a)  In the Facility, on or about September 22, 2016 - The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator before the employee is required to use the respirator in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 28, 2016
Abate by
Dec 2, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):  a)  In the Facility, on or about September 22, 2016 - The employer did not provide a fit test for employees who are required to use a respirator in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K03

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 28, 2016
Abate by
Dec 2, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(3): Training was not provided prior to requiring employees to use a respirator in the workplace:   a)  In the Facility, on or about September 22, 2016 - The employer did not provide training to employees who are required to use a respirator in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Oct 28, 2016
Abate by
Dec 2, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,138 · Current $1,604 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  a)  In the Facility, on or about September 22, 2016 - The employer did not develop, implement or maintain a written hazard communication program at the facility.  Employees work with hazardous materials including but not limited to flammable paints and thinners, oxygen and acetylene.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1603.5
  • — Z (S) $2138

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Oct 28, 2016
Abate by
Dec 2, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:   a)  In the Facility, on or about September 22, 2016 - The employer did not develop, implement or maintain a written hazard communication program at the facility.  Employees work with hazardous materials including but not limited to flammable paints and thinners, oxygen and acetylene.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Oct 28, 2016
Abate by
Dec 2, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification which included the requirements as outlined in 29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2):  a)  In the Facility, on or about September 22, 2016 - The employer did not perform a written certification which verifies the required workplace personal protective equipment hazard assessment had been conducted.  Employees at the facility use personal protective equipment including but not limited to eye protection and respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.252 B02 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 28, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.252(b)(2)(iii): Workers and other persons adjacent to the welding area were not protected from the rays by noncombustible or flameproof screens or shields:  a)  Welding Area, on or about September 22, 2016 - Workers and other persons adjacent to welding areas were not protected from welding rays by noncombustible or flameproof screens or shields.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341790798.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.