Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: KEVIN DUPONT

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of KEVIN DUPONT in 99 RESTAURANT 149 S. BROADWAY, SALEM, NH 03079 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341791978.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Kevin Dupont — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Kevin Dupont is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
KEVIN DUPONT
Site address
99 RESTAURANT 149 S. BROADWAY
City
SALEM
State
NH
ZIP
03079
Mailing
5 EMERSON WAY, SALEM, NH 03079
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
15
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 5, 2017
Abate by
Jan 11, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,563 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects:    a. Site- Employees working on the ground beneath employees actively performing roofing work were not provided with head protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $3563

1926.102 A01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jan 5, 2017
Abate by
Jan 11, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,563 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:    a. Site - Employees operating pneumatic nail guns were not provided with eye protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $3563

1926.416 A01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jan 5, 2017
Abate by
Jan 11, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,563 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.416(a)(1): Employees were permitted to work in proximity to electric power circuits and were not protected against electric shock by de-energizing and grounding the circuits or effectively guarding the circuits by insulation or other means:    a. Site - Employees performing roofing work were not protected from electrical shocks and burns when the electric service feed was not insulated where the wires enter the structure on the roof.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $3563

1926.501 B11

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jan 5, 2017
Abate by
Jan 11, 2017
Penalty
Initial $4,988 · Current $2,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11): Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:    a. Site - Employees performing roofing work were exposed to falls of 12 feet when fall protection was not used or provided.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2500
  • — Z (S) $4988

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jan 5, 2017
Abate by
Feb 1, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,563 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:    a. Site - Employees performing roofing work who were exposed to falls of 12 feet were not provided with fall protection training by the employer.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3563

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jan 5, 2017
Abate by
Jan 11, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,563 · Current $1,800 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:    a. Site - Employees using a fiberglass extension ladder to access the roof were not protected from falls of approximately 12 feet when the side rails were only extended approximately 6 inches above the roofs eave.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1800
  • — Z (S) $3563

1926.1053 B16

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Jan 5, 2017
Abate by
Jan 11, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(16): Portable ladders with structural defects, such as, but not limited to, broken or missing rungs, cleats, or steps, broken or split rails, corroded components, or other faulty or defective components, were not either immediately marked in a manner that readily identifies them as defective, or tagged with "Do Not Use" or similar language, and were not withdrawn from service until repaired:  a. Site - Employees using an aluminum extension ladder to gain access to and from the roof which had a damaged rung.   b. Site - Employees using an aluminum extension ladder to gain access to and from the roof which had a broken rung.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.602 C01 VI

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jan 5, 2017
Abate by
Jan 11, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.602(c)(1)(vi): Industrial truck(s) in use did not meet the applicable requirements of design, construction, stability, inspection, testing, maintenance, and operation, as defined in American National Standards Institute B56.1-1969, Safety Standards for Powered Industrial Trucks:  a. Site - An MEC all-terrain forklift was left unattended with the forks in the air.   American National Standards Institute B56.1-1969, Safety Standards for Powered Industrial Trucks, section 603 (E) requires that When leaving a powered industrial truck unattended, load engaging means shall be fully lowered, controls shall be neutralized, power shut off, brakes set, key or connector plug removed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Kevin Dupont's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341791978.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.