Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SUNRISE MASONRY, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SUNRISE MASONRY, INC. in 405 BRIDGEPORT AVE., SHELTON, CT 06484 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 341844140.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Sunrise Masonry, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Sunrise Masonry, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
405 BRIDGEPORT AVE.
City
SHELTON
State
CT
ZIP
06484
Mailing
269 DEKALB AVE., BRIDGEPORT, CT 06607
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 9, 2016
Abate by
Nov 22, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,741 · Current $2,620 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.    Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employees who were required to work from the edge of the roof at a height above six feet were protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2620
  • — Z (S) $3741

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 9, 2016
Abate by
Dec 7, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards.  Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employees who were required to work from the roof of the building under construction at a height above six feet were trained in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 9, 2016
Abate by
Nov 22, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,138 · Current $1,495 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.  Crossbraces were not allowed to use as a means of access.    Worksite: The employer did not provide a safe means of access for employees who were required to access the second level platform of the metal frame scaffold.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1495
  • — Z (S) $2138

1926.451 E08

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 9, 2016
Abate by
Nov 22, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,207 · Current $2,245 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(8): Direct access to or from another surface was used when the scaffold was more than 14 inches (36 cm) horizontally and/or 24 inches (61 cm) vertically from the other surface.    Worksite: The employer did not provide a means of access for employees who were required to gain access to the roof of the building from the scaffold platform that was located 5 feet 6 inches below the roof.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2245
  • — Z (S) $3207

1926.451 F07

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 9, 2016
Abate by
Dec 7, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,672 · Current $1,870 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person.    Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the metal frame scaffold that employees were required to use as a means of access to the roof of the building under construction was erected under the supervision of a person competent in scaffold erection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1870
  • — Z (S) $2672

1926.454 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 9, 2016
Abate by
Dec 7, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.454(a)(1): The employer failed to have each employee who performs work while on a scaffold trained regarding the nature of any electrical hazards, fall hazards and falling object hazards in the work area.  Worksite: The employer did not ensure that employees who were required to use metal frame scaffolding as a means of access to the roof of the building under construction were trained to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 G01 VII

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 9, 2016
Abate by
Nov 22, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,672 · Current $1,870 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section.    Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employees who were required to use the metal frame scaffold as a means of access to the roof of the building under construction were protected from fall hazards by the use of guardrails or personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1870
  • — Z (S) $2672

1910.178 L04 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 9, 2016
Abate by
Dec 7, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years.  Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the performance of the employee who was required to operate the all-terrain forklift was evaluated at least once every three years.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Sunrise Masonry, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341844140.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.