Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ATTICUS FRANCHISE GROUP, LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of ATTICUS FRANCHISE GROUP, LLC in 1124 HIGHWAY 19 SOUTH, LEESBURG, GA 31763 (NAICS 811121). OSHA activity number 341856466.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Atticus Franchise Group, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Atticus Franchise Group, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1124 HIGHWAY 19 SOUTH
City
LEESBURG
State
GA
ZIP
31763
Mailing
1124 HIGHWAY 19 SOUTH, LEESBURG, GA 31763
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
811121
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

11 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.106 D05 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 8, 2017
Abate by
Apr 3, 2017
Penalty
Initial $6,519 · Current $3,911 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.106(d)(5)(i): Flammable liquids were stored so as to limit use of exits, stairways, or areas normally used for the safe egress of people:  a) At the facility, on or about October 19, 2016 and at times prior to, multiple 5-gallon cans containing waste which included flammable liquids such as paint thinners were stored inside the building near an exit door, exposing employees to a fire hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3911.4
  • — Z (S) $6519

1910.107 E09

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 8, 2017
Penalty
Initial $6,519 · Current $3,911 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.107(e)(9): Flammable liquids for use in spraying operations were transferred from one container to another without both containers being effectively bonded and grounded to prevent discharge sparks of static electricity:    a) At the facility, on or about October 19, 2016 and at times prior to, an employee dispensed lacquer thinner, a Class I flammable liquid from a 53 gallon drum into a five gallon bucket without effectively bonding and grounding the containers, resulting in a fire hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3911.4
  • — Z (S) $6519

1910.134 D01 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 8, 2017
Abate by
Apr 24, 2017
Penalty
Initial $8,149 · Current $4,889 Reduced

Hazardous substances 913598059965

29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form:  a) At the facility, on or about and at times prior to October 19, 2016, the employer did not evaluate the exposure levels for employees that were required to wear tight-fitting respirators (half mask respirators and dust masks) while performing painting and sanding operations, exposing employees to respiratory irritation and dermatitis.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4889.4
  • — Z (S) $8149

1910.134 D03 III B 2

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 8, 2017
Abate by
Apr 3, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(3)(iii)(B)(2): The employer did not implement a change schedule for respirators not equipped with an End of Service Life Indicator that would ensure cartridges were changed before the end of their service life:    a) At the facility, on or about and at times prior to October 19, 2016, the employer did not implement a cartridge change schedule for employees that were required to wear tight fitting respirators (half mask respirators) while performing painting and sanding operations, exposing employees to respiratory irritation and dermatitis.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 8, 2017
Abate by
Apr 24, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:   a) At the facility, on or about and at times prior to October 19, 2016, the employer failed to provide medical evaluations for employees required to wear tight fitting respirators (half mask respirators and dust masks) while performing painting and sanding operations, exposing employees to respiratory irritation and dermatitis.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 8, 2017
Abate by
Apr 24, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:   a) At the facility, on or about and at times prior to October 19, 2016, the employer failed to provide fit testing for employees required to wear tight fitting respirators (half mask respirators and dust masks) while performing painting and sanding operations, exposing employees to respiratory irritation and dermatitis.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 G01 I A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 8, 2017
Abate by
Apr 3, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function:  a) At the facility, on or about and at times prior to October 19, 2016, the employer permitted employees with facial hair (more than one day's growth) to wear tight-fitting respirators (half mask respirators and dust masks) while performing painting and sanding operations, exposing employees to respiratory irritation and dermatitis.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 H01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 8, 2017
Abate by
Apr 3, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(1)(i): Respirators issued for the exclusive use of an employee were not cleaned and disinfected as often as necessary to be maintained in a sanitary condition:   a) At the facility, on or about and at times prior to October 19, 2016, the employer did not ensure that the respirators that were required to be worn by employees while performing painting and sanding operations were clean, disinfected and in sanitary conditions, exposing employees to respiratory irritation and dermatitis.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K01 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 8, 2017
Abate by
Apr 3, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1)(iv): The employer did not ensure that each user could demonstrate knowledge of how to inspect, put on, remove, use, and check the seals of the respirator:   a)At the facility, on or about and at times prior to October 19, 2016, the employees who were required to wear a tight-fitting respirators (half mask respirators and dust masks) while performing painting and sanding operations were not effectively trained to remain clean shaven and on how facial hair would compromise the seal between the face and the respirator, exposing the employees to respiratory and skin irritations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 8, 2017
Abate by
Apr 3, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(3): Training was not provided prior to requiring employees to use a respirator in the workplace:  a) At the facility, on or about and at times prior to October 19, 2016, the employer did not ensure that employees required to wear tight fitting respirators (half mask respirators and dust masks) were effectively trained in the procedures for proper use, maintenance, cleaning and storage of the respirators, exposing the employee to respiratory and skin irritations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.107 B05 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 8, 2017
Abate by
Apr 24, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 98059965

29 CFR 1910.107(b)(5)(i): The average air speed over the open face of the paint spray booth was less than 100 linear feet per minute. There were no visible gauges, audible alarms or pressure activated devices installed in paint spray booths to indicate or ensure that the required air speed was maintained.  a) Hazards-Operation/Condition: At the spray booth, on or about and at times prior to December 22, 2016, the average air speed over the open face of the paint spray booth was 43.6 linear feet per minute which was less than the required 100 linear feet per minute and visible gauges, audible alarms or pressure activated devices were not installed to indicate or ensure that the required air speed was maintained, exposing employees to safety and health hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Atticus Franchise Group, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341856466.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.