Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: NEMESIS METALS LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of NEMESIS METALS LLC in 1250 HICKORY ST., FOND DU LAC, WI 54936 (NAICS 332999). OSHA activity number 341866408.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Nemesis Metals LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Nemesis Metals LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
NEMESIS METALS LLC
Site address
1250 HICKORY ST.
City
FOND DU LAC
State
WI
ZIP
54936
Mailing
PO BOX 2303, FOND DU LAC, WI 54935
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332999
Employees
25
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Dec 16, 2016
Abate by
Feb 18, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,563 · Current $1,782 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative:    The employer did not establish an energy control program consisting of adequate energy control procedures, employee training, and periodic inspections when employees were performing service and maintenance work on machine equipment including die-setting of hydraulic brake presses.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1781.5
  • — Z (S) $3563

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Dec 16, 2016
Abate by
Feb 18, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:    The employer did not develop, document, or utilize energy control procedures when employees engaged in die-setting activities on the Amada hydraulic brake presses or performed preventative maintenance on the brake presses and Amada laser machines.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 16, 2016
Abate by
Jan 18, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,563 · Current $1,782 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    (a)  On or about October 26, 2016, employees were exposed to the ingoing nip points of chain and sprockets and crushed by hazards created by the Amada FO4020NT #1 laser part tables that traverse in and out of the laser cell.      (b)  On or about October 26, 2016, employees were exposed to the ingoing nip points of chain and sprockets and crushed by hazards created by the Amada FO4020NT #2 laser part tables that traverse in and out of the laser cell.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1781.5
  • — Z (S) $3563

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Dec 16, 2016
Abate by
Apr 28, 2017
Penalty
Initial $4,988 · Current $2,494 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):    (a)  On or about October 7, 2016 employees were exposed to the point of operation created between the dies of an unguarded Amada HFE-220-4S hydraulic press brake located in the press brake department.      (b)  On or about October 7, 2016 employees were exposed to the point of operation created between the dies of an unguarded Amada HDS-8025NT hydraulic press brake located in the press brake department.     (a)  On or about October 7, 2016 employees were exposed to the point of operation created between the dies of an unguarded Amada HDS-1703NT hydraulic press brake located in the press brake department.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2494
  • — Z (S) $4988

1904.31 B02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Dec 16, 2016
Penalty
Initial $400 · Current $200 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.31(b)(2): The employer did not record injuries and illnesess for employees obtained from a temporary help service, employee leasing service, or personnel supply service, and were supervised by the employer on a day-to-day basis:    On or about October 7, 2016, the employer did not record a temporary employee's crushed right hand which required surgery on their OSHA 300 log when the employee was supervised by the employer's management.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $200
  • — Z (O) $400

View Nemesis Metals LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341866408.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.