MOBILE, AL —
OSHA Inspection: LIQUID ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS OF ALABAMA, LLC
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of LIQUID ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS OF ALABAMA, LLC in 1980 AVENUE A, MOBILE, AL 36615 (NAICS 562219). OSHA activity number 341949824.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- LIQUID ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS OF ALABAMA, LLC
- Site address
- 1980 AVENUE A
- City
- MOBILE
- State
- AL
- ZIP
- 36615
- Mailing
- 7651 ESTERS BLVD., SUITE 200 ATTN: JOHN BROWN, IRVING, TX 75063
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 562219
- Employees
- 35
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.95 C01
- Issued
- Apr 10, 2017
- Abate by
- Apr 18, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $9,234 · Current $3,160 Reduced
8111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.9 (c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent: a) Rail tank car cleaning area; On or about December 7, 2016 and at times prior; the employer exposed the employees cleaning rail asphalt tank car #PTLX 223665 to noise at levels of 261.5% (equivalent to an 8 hour time weighted average TWA of 98.7 dBA) which is 5.2 times the action level of 50% (equivalent to an 8 hour TWA of 85dBA) while working in the railcar cleaning area. Results were calculated for a 374 minutes sampling period. The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3160
- — Z (S) $9234
1910.95 D01
- Issued
- Apr 10, 2017
- Abate by
- Apr 18, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
8111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(d)(1): When information indicated that any employee's exposure equaled or exceed the 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels, the employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program: a) Rail tank car cleaning area; on or about December 2, 2016 the employer failed to implement a program to monitor the noise levels employees were exposed to while cleaning rail asphalt tank car #PTLX 223665.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.95 G01
- Issued
- Apr 10, 2017
- Abate by
- Apr 18, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
8111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(g)(1): The employer did not establish and maintain an audiometric testing program as provided by 29 CFR 1910.95(g) by making audiometric testing available to all employees whose exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels: a) Rail car cleaning area; on or about December 7, 2016 and times prior the employer failed to annually obtain audiograms for those employee exposed at or above an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.95 K01
- Issued
- Apr 10, 2017
- Abate by
- Apr 18, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
8111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(k)(1): The employer did not train each employee who is exposed to noise at or above an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.95(k). The employer did not institute a training program and ensure employee participation in the program: a) Rail tank car cleaning area; on or about December 2, 2016 the employer failed to implement a Hearing Conservation training program for the employees cleaning rail asphalt tank car #PTLX 223665.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.146 C05 II G 2
- Issued
- Apr 10, 2017
- Abate by
- Apr 18, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $6,157 · Current $5,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(5)(ii)(G)(2): Employees entered into permit spaces that met the conditions set forth in 29 CFR 1910.146(c)(5)(i) but when a hazardous atmosphere was detected during entry, the space was not evaluated to determine how the hazardous atmosphere developed: a) Rail tank car cleaning area; on or about December 7, 2016 the employer failed to evaluate the confined space for permit issued to railcar #PTLX 223665 to determine why an employee's personal monitor went off and indicated LEL 36% and CO 24 ppm while cleaning the railcar.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $5000
- — Z (S) $6157
1910.146 E05 II
- Issued
- Apr 10, 2017
- Abate by
- Apr 18, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(e)(5)(ii): The entry supervisor did not terminate the entry and cancel the entry permit when a condition that was not allowed under the entry permit arose in or near the permit: a) Rail tank car cleaning area; on or about December 7, 2016 the employer failed to ensure the confined space for permit issued to railcar #PTLX 223665 was cancelled when an employee's personal monitor went off and indicated LEL 36% and CO 24 ppm while cleaning the railcar.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.253 B04 III
- Issued
- Apr 10, 2017
- Abate by
- Apr 14, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $6,542 · Current $5,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.253(b)(4)(iii): Oxygen cylinders in storage were not separated from fuel-gas cylinders or combustible materials (especially oil or grease), a minimum distance of 20 feet (6.1 m) or by a noncombustible barrier at least 5 feet (1.5 m) high having a fire-resistance rating of at least: a) Yard area behind rail car connex; on or about December 2, 2016 and times prior the employer exposed employees to struck by hazards in that oxygen/acetylene fuel-gas cylinders stored together when not in use.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $5000
- — Z (S) $6542
More inspections at Liquid Environmental Solutions of Alabama, LLC
View Liquid Environmental Solutions of Alabama, LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 562219)
More inspections in AL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341949824.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.