Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: GCB REMODELING, LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of GCB REMODELING, LLC in 389 GLENWOOD AVENUE, PAWTUCKET, RI 02860 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 342035839.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch GCB Remodeling, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for GCB Remodeling, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
GCB REMODELING, LLC
Site address
389 GLENWOOD AVENUE
City
PAWTUCKET
State
RI
ZIP
02860
Mailing
12 PALM STREET P.O. BOX 9091, NORTH PROVIDENCE, RI 02904
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
9
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 2, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $3,803
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:   (a) Worksite:  On or about 1/19/2017, employees were not protected from overhead hazards while working below roofers.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3803

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 2, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:  (a) Worksite:  On or about 1/19/2017, eye and face protective equipment was not used when an employee was using a pneumatic nail gun.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 2, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $3,803
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor was the employee provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b):   (a) Worksite:  On or about 1/19/2017, an employee was not protected from falls while working on a residential roof at a height of approximately 8.5 feet above the lower level.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3803

1926.1053 B15

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 2, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $3,803
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(15): Ladders were not inspected by a competent person for visible defects on a periodic basis and after an occurrence that could affect their safe use:   (a) Worksite:  On or about 1/19/2017, employees were exposed to a fall from a ladder which had not been inspected for visible defects.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3803

1926.1053 B16

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 2, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(16): Portable ladders with structural defects, such as, but not limited to, broken or missing rungs, cleats, or steps, broken or split rails, corroded components, or other faulty or defective components, were not either immediately marked in a manner that readily identifies them as defective, or tagged with "Do Not Use" or similar language, and were not withdrawn from service until repaired:  (a) Worksite:  On or about 1/19/2017, a portable extension ladder with damaged anti-slip safety footpads was not withdrawn from service.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.503 A01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 2, 2017
Abate by
Mar 21, 2017
Penalty
Initial $305 · Current $305
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:   (a) Worksite:  On or about 1/19/2017, the employer did not provide adequate training for the employees who might be exposed to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $305

1926.1060 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 2, 2017
Abate by
Mar 21, 2017
Penalty
Initial $305 · Current $305
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards:   (a) Worksite:  On or about 1/19/2017, the employer did not provide adequate training to employees who use ladders.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $305

View GCB Remodeling, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342035839.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.