OSHA Inspection: FEDERAL AIR MARSHAL SERVICE

Issued

Apr 4, 2017

Abate by

Apr 28, 2017

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.9(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent:  At the Federal Air Marshal Service firing range and airline cabins: Employees were exposed to occupational noise hazards in that an effective hearing conservation program was not established and maintained.

Issued

Apr 4, 2017

Abate by

Apr 28, 2017

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.95(d)(1): When information indicated that any employee's exposure equaled or exceed the 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels, the employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program:  At the Federal Air Marshal Service firing range and airline cabins: Employees were exposed to occupational noise hazards in that a monitoring program was not developed and implemented.

Issued

Apr 4, 2017

Abate by

Apr 28, 2017

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.95(g)(6): At least annually after obtaining the baseline audiogram, the employer did not obtain a new audiogram for each employee exposed at or above an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels:  At the Federal Air Marshal Service firing range and airline cabins: Employees were exposed to occupational noise hazards in that new audiograms are not obtained at least annually.

Issued

Apr 4, 2017

Abate by

Apr 28, 2017

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.95(k)(2): The training program was not repeated annually for each employee included in the hearing conservation program:  At the Federal Air Marshal Service firing range and airline cabins: Employees were exposed to occupational noise hazards in that the required training was not performed annually.

Issued

Apr 4, 2017

Abate by

Apr 28, 2017

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.95(l)(1): The employer did not post of copy of 29 CFR 1910.95 in the workplace:  At the Federal Air Marshal Service firing range and airline cabins: Employees were exposed to occupational noise hazards in that a copy of 29 CFR 1910.95 was not posted in the employee's workplace.

Issued

Apr 4, 2017

Abate by

Apr 28, 2017

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1025(d)(2): An initial determination was not made to determine if any employee may be exposed to lead at or above the action level:  At the Federal Air Marshal Service firing range: Employees were exposed to health effects related to lead in that an initial determination was not made to determine if an employee may be exposed to lead at or above the action level.

Issued

Apr 4, 2017

Abate by

Apr 28, 2017

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1025(l)(1)(i): Employee(s) working in an area where there is potential exposure to airborne lead at any level were not informed of the content of Appendices A and B of 29 CFR 1910.1025:  At the Federal Air Marshal Service firing range: Employees were exposed to health effects related to lead in that the information contained in Appendices A and B of 29 CFR 1910.1025 was not provided to employees.

Issued

Apr 4, 2017

Abate by

Apr 28, 2017

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1025(h)(1): All surfaces were not maintained as free as practicable of accumulations of lead:  At the Federal Air Marshal Service weapons cleaning room: Employees were exposed to health effects related to lead in that Employees were exposed to health effects related to lead in that surface accumulations of lead were not as free as practicable. 82.03 micrograms of lead was identified on a 10 centimeter by 10 centimeter sampling area on the table.

Issued

Apr 4, 2017

Abate by

Apr 28, 2017

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  Employees were exposed to health effects related to lead and other chemicals in that a written hazard communication program was not developed and implemented.

Issued

Apr 4, 2017

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): Employers did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use  Employees were exposed to health effects related to lead in that a safety data sheets for ammunition were not maintained at the workplace.

Issued

Apr 4, 2017

Abate by

Apr 28, 2017

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  Employees were exposed to health effects related to lead and other chemicals in that effective information and training was not offered prior to initial assignment to use the hazardous chemicals present in the workplace.