Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: VIMAR STUCCO, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of VIMAR STUCCO, INC. in LAKE MONTAUK DR. SUITE 102, RIVERVIEW, FL 33568 (NAICS 238350). OSHA activity number 342078698.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Vimar Stucco, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Vimar Stucco, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
VIMAR STUCCO, INC.
Site address
LAKE MONTAUK DR. SUITE 102
City
RIVERVIEW
State
FL
ZIP
33568
Mailing
210 BRYAN RD SUITE 102, BRANDON, FL 33511
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238350
Employees
10
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 17, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $3,803
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii)  (a) West scaffold - during masonry operations, employee(s) were exposed to a 12' fall hazard, in that, the work platform was not fully planked.  Violation observed on or about 02/02/2017.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3803

1926.451 F15

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 17, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $3,803
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(15): Ladders were used on scaffolds to increase the working level height of employees:   (a) West scaffold - during masonry operations, an employee was exposed to a 15' fall hazard, in that, a masons ladder was used on the scaffold work platform to achieve a greater height.  Violation observed on or about 02/02/2017.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3803

1926.452 C03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 17, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $3,803
29 CFR 1926.452(c)(3): Frames and panels were not joined together vertically by coupling or stacking pins or equivalent means:  (a) West scaffold - during masonry operations, employee(s) were exposed to a 12' fall hazard, in that, a portion of the top rail was secured by a "red tape".  Violation observed on or about 02/02/2017.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3803

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 17, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $3,803
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m)  or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502:   (a) West scaffold - during masonry operations, employee(s) were exposed to a 14' fall hazard, in that, fall protection was not provided while on the roof of the residential house.  Violation observed on or about 02/02/2017.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3803

1926.451 E01

Repeat Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 17, 2017
Penalty
Initial $7,605 · Current $7,605
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.  Crossbraces were used as a means of access:  (a) West scaffold - during masonry operations, employee(s) were exposed to a 12' fall hazard, in that, crossbraces were used as a means for access on to the scaffold and a ladder was not used.  Violation observed on or about 02/02/2017.    The Vimar Stucco, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1926.451(e)(1), which was contained in OSHA inspection number586458, citation number01, item number 002 and was affirmed as a final order on 12/04/2012, with respect to a workplace located at 825 W. Brandon Blvd. Brandon, FL.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (R) $7605

1926.451 G04 I

Repeat Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 17, 2017
Penalty
Initial $7,605 · Current $7,605
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(i): Guardrail systems were not installed along all open sides and ends of platforms before being released for use by employees other than erection/dismantling crews:  (a) West scaffold - on a tubular welded frame scaffold, endrails were not used during masonry operation and exposed employees to a 12' fall hazard. Violation observed on or about 02/02/2017.    The Vimar Stucco, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1926.451(g(4)(I), which was contained in OSHA inspection number586458, citation number01, item number 003 and was affirmed as a final order on 12/04/2012, with respect to a workplace located at 825 W. Brandon Blvd. Brandon, FL.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (R) $7605

1926.454 A

Repeat 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 17, 2017
Penalty
Initial $1,087 · Current $1,087
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards:  a. West scaffold - training was not provided to employee(s) prior to masonry operations on a tubular and welded frame scaffold and were exposed to a 12' fall hazard.  Violation observed on or about 2/2/2017.  The Vimar Stucco, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1926.454(a), which was contained in OSHA inspection number586458, citation number01, item number 004 and was affirmed as a final order on 12/04/2012, with respect to a workplace located at 825 W. Brandon Blvd. Brandon, FL.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (R) $1087

1926.451 F03

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 17, 2017
Penalty
Initial $305 · Current $305
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity:  (a) West scaffold - during masonry operations, employee(s) were exposed to a 12' fall hazard, in that, the work platform was not fully planked, there were no endrails and top rails were secured with a red tape.  Violation observed on or about 02/02/2017.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $305

View Vimar Stucco, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342078698.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.