NEW YORK, NY ·
OSHA Inspection: BREND RENOVATION CORP
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of BREND RENOVATION CORP in 1175 YORK AVENUE, NEW YORK, NY 10065 (NAICS 238190). OSHA activity number 342120656.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BREND RENOVATION CORP
- Site address
- 1175 YORK AVENUE
- City
- NEW YORK
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 10065
- Mailing
- 310 NASSAU AVENUE #100, BROOKLYN, NY 11222
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238190
- Employees
- 12
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 D01 III
- Issued
- Jul 28, 2017
- Abate by
- Aug 14, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,984 · Current $2,390 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): Referencing CFR 1926.103: The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form: a) At the jobsite, on or about 2/16/17: Employees ground out brick joints in preparation for pointing where the employer did not identify and evaluate respiratory hazards associated with Silica.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2390
- · Z (S) $3984
1926.451 A06
- Issued
- Jul 28, 2017
- Abate by
- Aug 7, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $5,577 · Current $3,346 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(a)(6): Scaffolds were not constructed in accordance with the design by a qualified person: a) At the jobsite, on or about 2/16/17: Employees used fall protection lifelines that were part of an engineered two-point suspended scaffold design, where the deployment of vertical lifelines in that design was depicted inconsistently and depicted without significant structural elements as part of that design. The qualified persons who constructed this system did so without clear direction with regard to the fall protection elements.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $3346
- · Z (S) $5577
1926.502 D15
- Issued
- Jul 28, 2017
- Abate by
- Aug 7, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $5,577 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15): Anchorages used for attachment of personal fall arrest equipment were not capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds per employee attached. a) At the jobsite, on or about 2/16/17: Employees used fall protection lifelines that were anchored with knots, where the employer did not ensure that the anchorages would support at least 5,000 pounds per employee and could not determine that the anchorage would provide a safety factor of at least 2.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $5577
1926.502 D11
- Issued
- Jul 28, 2017
- Abate by
- Aug 7, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,984 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(11): Lifelines were not protected against being cut or abraded: a) At the jobsite, on or about 2/16/17: Employees used a fall protection lifelines that was anchored next to and against wire rope connection where the lifeline would abrade against the wire rope and its three connectors.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $3984
More inspections at Brend Renovation Corp
View Brend Renovation Corp's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238190)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342120656.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.