Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: BREND RENOVATION CORP

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of BREND RENOVATION CORP in 1175 YORK AVENUE, NEW YORK, NY 10065 (NAICS 238190). OSHA activity number 342120656.

Watch Brend Renovation Corp — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Brend Renovation Corp is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1175 YORK AVENUE
City
NEW YORK
State
NY
ZIP
10065
Mailing
310 NASSAU AVENUE #100, BROOKLYN, NY 11222
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238190
Employees
12
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 D01 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3984.00 · Current $2390.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): Referencing CFR 1926.103: The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form:    a)  At the jobsite, on or about 2/16/17:  Employees ground out brick joints in preparation for pointing where the employer did not identify and evaluate respiratory hazards associated with Silica.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2390
  • — Z (S) $3984

1926.451 A06

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5577.00 · Current $3346.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(a)(6): Scaffolds were not constructed in accordance with the design by a qualified person:    a)  At the jobsite, on or about 2/16/17:  Employees used fall protection lifelines that were part of an engineered two-point suspended scaffold design, where the deployment of vertical lifelines in that design was depicted inconsistently and depicted without significant structural elements as part of that design.  The qualified persons who constructed this system did so without clear direction with regard to the fall protection elements.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3346
  • — Z (S) $5577

1926.502 D15

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5577.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15): Anchorages used for attachment of personal fall arrest equipment were not capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds per employee attached.  a)  At the jobsite, on or about 2/16/17:  Employees used fall protection lifelines that were anchored with knots, where the employer did not ensure that the anchorages would support at least 5,000 pounds per employee and could not determine that the anchorage would provide a safety factor of at least 2.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $5577

1926.502 D11

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3984.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(11): Lifelines were not protected against being cut or abraded:  a)  At the jobsite, on or about 2/16/17:  Employees used a fall protection lifelines that was anchored next to and against wire rope connection where the lifeline would abrade against the wire rope and its three connectors.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3984

View BREND RENOVATION CORP's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342120656.