BUDA, TX —
OSHA Inspection: JOSE RODRIGUEZ CONSTRUCTION
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JOSE RODRIGUEZ CONSTRUCTION in 1240 CABELAS DRIVE, BUDA, TX 78610 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 342125077.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- JOSE RODRIGUEZ CONSTRUCTION
- Site address
- 1240 CABELAS DRIVE
- City
- BUDA
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 78610
- Mailing
- 901 PANGBURN STREET, GRAND PRAIRIE, TX 75051
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.300 B01
- Issued
- Mar 9, 2017
- Abate by
- Mar 28, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $1,630 · Current $978 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.300(b)(1): Power operated tool(s), designed to accommodate guards, were not equipped with such guards when in use: On or about 23 February 2017, at the rear of the building, employee(s) were using a Makita angle grinder without the manufactured guard attached, exposing employees to the hazards such as, but not limited to being caught in the rotating wheel and/or struck by flying particles.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $978
- — Z (S) $1630
1926.405 G02 IV
- Issued
- Mar 9, 2017
- Abate by
- Mar 28, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $1,630 · Current $978 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.405(g)(2)(iv): Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief is provided to prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws: On or about 23 February 2017, at the back of the building, a power strip and an orange extension cord/flexible cord being used by employees to power a Makita angle grinder was not provided with strain relief, exposing employees to electrical hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $978
- — Z (S) $1630
1926.451 C02
- Issued
- Mar 9, 2017
- Abate by
- Mar 28, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $1,630 · Current $978 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): The employer did not ensure that supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, and uprights were bearing on base plates and mud sills or other adequate firm foundation: On or about 22 February 2017, employees were conducting exterior stonework/bricklaying work while working on scaffolds that did not have mudsills and/or baseplates, exposing employees to a fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $978
- — Z (S) $1630
1926.451 E01
- Issued
- Mar 9, 2017
- Abate by
- Mar 28, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): The employer did not ensure that employees working on scaffold platforms that were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) high had proper means of access and egress: On or about 22 February 2017, employees were conducting bricklaying work while working on a scaffold that was approximately 36 feet tall without ladder access, exposing employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 G04 XV
- Issued
- Mar 9, 2017
- Abate by
- Mar 28, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(xv): The crossbracing was not adequate as the midrail: On or about 22 February 2017, at the rear of the building, the crossbracing on the scaffold being used by employees did not have a midrail exposing employees to a fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.454 A
- Issued
- Mar 9, 2017
- Abate by
- Mar 28, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not ensure that each employee performing work while on a scaffold was trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards: On or about 22 February 2017, employees working on scaffolds located in the rear of the construction site had not received effective training.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B04
- Issued
- Mar 9, 2017
- Abate by
- Mar 28, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $1,630 · Current $978 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladders were used for purposes other than the purpose for which they were designed: On or about 22 February 2017, in the rear of the building, a six (6) foot "A" frame (foot step) ladder designed to be used in the open and braced position, was left in the closed position while an employees utilized it to access the platform of a one story scaffold exposing employees to a fall hazard
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $978
- — Z (S) $1630
More inspections at Jose Rodriguez Construction
View Jose Rodriguez Construction's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342125077.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.