STRONGSVILLE, OH —
OSHA Inspection: KALINICH FENCE COMPANY
Referral inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of KALINICH FENCE COMPANY in 12223 PROSPECT, STRONGSVILLE, OH 44136 (NAICS 321999). OSHA activity number 342180817.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- KALINICH FENCE COMPANY
- Site address
- 12223 PROSPECT
- City
- STRONGSVILLE
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 44136
- Mailing
- 12223 PROSPECT, STRONGSVILLE, OH 44136
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 321999
- Employees
- 30
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.22 A01
- Issued
- May 4, 2017
- Abate by
- May 15, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $6,338 · Current $1,584 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(1): Places of employment, passageways, storerooms or service rooms were not kept clean and orderly to the extent that the nature of the work allowed: On or about March 20, 2017, the employer did not keep work stations and surfaces such as walls, floors, rafters, and electrical panels clean from the build up of wood dust.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $1584
- — C (S) $6338
- — Z (S) $6338
1910.95 B01
- Issued
- May 4, 2017
- Abate by
- Jun 8, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $8,873 · Current $2,218 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(b)(1): When employees were subjected to sound exceeding those listed in Table G-16, feasible administrative or engineering controls were not utilized: On March 22, 2017, the Planer and Toaster operator was exposed to continuous noise levels at 224% of the permissible daily exposure (8-hour, time-weighted average sound level of 90 dBA or equivalently, a dose of 100 percent), during the 445 minute sampling period. Exposure calculations include a zero increment for the 25 minutes not sampled.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $2218
- — C (S) $8873
- — Z (S) $8873
1910.95 G05 I
- Issued
- May 4, 2017
- Abate by
- May 24, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $8,873 · Current $2,218 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(g)(5)(i): The employer did not establish, within 6 months of an employee's first exposure at or above the action level, a valid baseline audiogram against which subsequent audiograms can be compared: The employer did not establish a baseline for employees within 6 months of an employee's first exposure. a) On March 22, 2017, the Planer and Toaster Operator was exposed to continuous noise levels at 228% of the permissible daily exposure (8-hour, time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or equivalently, a dose of 50 percent), during the 445 minute sampling period. Exposure calculations include a zero increment for the 35 minutes not sampled. The employee has been a temporary employee at the company for 3 years and has not received a audiogram. b) On March 22, 2017, the Forklift and Toaster Operator was exposed to continuous noise levels at 84% of the permissible daily exposure (8-hour, time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or equivalently, a dose of 50 percent), during the 469 minute sampling period. Exposure calculations include a zero increment for the 11 minutes not sampled. The employee has been a full time employee at the company for 4 years and has not received a audiogram.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $2218
- — C (S) $8873
- — Z (S) $8873
1910.95 G06
- Issued
- May 4, 2017
- Abate by
- May 24, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(g)(6): At least annually after obtaining the baseline audiogram, the employer did not obtain a new audiogram for each employee exposed at or above an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels: The employer did not obtain a new audiogram annually for employees exposed to 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA) sound levels of 85 dBA or greater (50% dose). a) On March 22, 2017, the Train Operator was exposed to continuous noise levels at 63.1% of the permissible daily exposure (8-hour, time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or equivalently, a dose of 50 percent), during the 463 minute sampling period. Exposure calculations include a zero increment for the 17 minutes not sampled. This employee had a lapse in time between audiograms. According to the employee he has been a temporary employee at the company for 26 years and its been over 10 years since having a audiogram. b) On March 22, 2017, the Snow Fence Machine Operator was exposed to continuous noise levels at 101.1% of the permissible daily exposure (8-hour, time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA or equivalently, a dose of 50 percent), during the 479 minute sampling period. Exposure calculations include a zero increment for the 1 minutes not sampled. This employee had a lapse in time between audiograms. According to the employee he has been a full time employee at the company for 12 years and its been over 10 years since having a audiogram.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.95 K01
- Issued
- May 4, 2017
- Abate by
- May 15, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $8,873 · Current $2,218 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(k)(1): The employer did not train each employee who is exposed to noise at or above an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.95(k): On or about March 22, 2017, the employer had not provided training to employees exposed to a 8 hour time weighted average of 85 decibels.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $2218
- — C (S) $8873
- — Z (S) $8873
1910.95 K02
- Issued
- May 4, 2017
- Abate by
- May 15, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(k)(2): The training program was not repeated annually for each employee included in the hearing conservation program. Information in the training program was not updated to be consistent with changes in protective equipment and work processes: On or about March 22, 2017, the employer had not provided annual training to employees involved in the hearing conservation program.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Kalinich Fence Company
View Kalinich Fence Company's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 321999)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342180817.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.