Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: LUIS DUCHI FLORES

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of LUIS DUCHI FLORES in 239-241 COTTAGE STREET, PAWTUCKET, RI 02860 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 342196375.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Luis Duchi Flores — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Luis Duchi Flores is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
LUIS DUCHI FLORES
Site address
239-241 COTTAGE STREET
City
PAWTUCKET
State
RI
ZIP
02860
Mailing
4 NORTH BOW STREET APT 4, MILFORD, MA 01757
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 18, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,716 · Current $2,716
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:   (a) Worksite:  On or about 3/24/2017, employees were not protected from overhead hazards while working below roofers.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2716

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 18, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $3,803
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees were not provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:   (a) Worksite:  On or about 3/24/2017, eye and face protective equipment was not used when an employee was operating a pneumatic nail gun.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3803

1926.451 B05 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 18, 2017
Abate by
Apr 27, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $3,803
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(5)(ii): The end of a platform greater than 10 feet in length extended over its support more than 18 inches and the platform was not designed and installed so that the cantilevered portion of the platform is able to support employees without tipping, or has guardrails which block employee access to the cantilevered end:   (a) Worksite:  On or about 3/24/2017, a scaffold platform extended beyond its support more than 18 inches.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3803

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 18, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used:    (a) Worksite:  On or about 3/24/2017, proper access to the pump-jack scaffold platform was not provided.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 18, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section:   (a) Worksite:  On or about 3/24/2017, an employee was not protected from falling while working from a pump-jack scaffold that was approximately twenty-one feet above a lower level.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.452 K01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 18, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $3,803
29 CFR 1926.452(k)(1): Ladder jack scaffold platforms exceeded a height of 20 feet (6.1 m):  (a) Worksite:  On or about, 3/24/2017, a ladder jack scaffold platform was approximately twenty-one feet in height.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3803

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 18, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $3,803
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employees provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b):   (a) Worksite:  On or about 3/24/2017, employees were not protected from falling while working on a roof approximately twenty-two feet above a lower level.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3803

1926.1053 B22

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 18, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,716 · Current $2,716
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(22): Employees  using ladders were carrying objects or loads that could cause the employee to lose balance and fall:   (a) Worksite:  On or about 3/24/2017, an employee was exposed to falling while ascending a ladder carrying two wood planks, approximately twelve feet in length, which could have caused the employee to lose his balance and fall.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2716

View Luis Duchi Flores's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342196375.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.