Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: RUBEN ERAUSQUIN

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of RUBEN ERAUSQUIN in 12 ELM ST., NEWPORT, RI 02840 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 342225844.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Ruben Erausquin for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Ruben Erausquin is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
RUBEN ERAUSQUIN
Site address
12 ELM ST.
City
NEWPORT
State
RI
ZIP
02840
Mailing
4 LINCOLN ST., NEWPORT, RI 02840
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 18, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $3,803
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Platform(s) on all working levels of scaffolds, were not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and guardrail supports such that the space between adjacent units, and the space between the platform and the uprights :  Worksite: Working platforms on all levels were not fully planked.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $3803

1926.451 G01 VII

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 18, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section.  Worksite: Guardrails or equivalent means of fall protection was not being used or provided on the scaffold.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

View Ruben Erausquin's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342225844.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.