Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: GRAHAM WELDING, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of GRAHAM WELDING, INC. in 813 E NORTH ST, DECATUR, IL 62521 (NAICS 332999). OSHA activity number 342226040.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Graham Welding, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Graham Welding, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
813 E NORTH ST
City
DECATUR
State
IL
ZIP
62521
Mailing
813 E NORTH ST, DECATUR, IL 62521
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332999
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 15, 2017
Abate by
Jul 17, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,716 · Current $1,358 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):    On or about April 4, 2017 employees who worked near and operated forklifts were exposed to struck-by hazards and the employer did not provide training to the forklift operators.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1358
  • — Z (S) $2716

1910.178 L01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 15, 2017
Abate by
Jul 17, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training required by paragraph (l), except as permitted by paragraph (l)(5), prior to permitting an employee to operate an industrial truck:  On or about April 4, 2017 employees who worked near and operated forklifts were exposed to struck-by hazards and the employer did not ensure that the operators had been trained to operate the forklifts.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 15, 2017
Abate by
Jul 17, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $1,902 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    On or about April 4, 2017 an employee operating the Wells horizontal band saw was exposed to amputation hazards and the employer did not ensure that unused portions of the saw blade were effectively guarded.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1901.5
  • — Z (S) $3803

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 15, 2017
Abate by
Sep 18, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):    On or about April 4, 2017 an employees operating equipment were exposed to amputation hazards and the point(s) of operation were not guarded:    a.  The Chicago Steel press brake was not guarded to prevent employees' hands and fingers from accessing the press dies during operation.    b. The Scotchman hydraulic punch was not guarded at the point of operation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.303 B01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 15, 2017
Abate by
Jul 17, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,259 · Current $1,630 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(1)(ii): Electrical equipment was not free from recognized hazards, based on the mechanical strength and durability, including, for parts designed to enclose and protect other equipment, the adequacy of the protection thus provided:    On or about April 4, 2017 employees working in the welding room were exposed to electric shock hazards and the employer did not ensure that equipment was free of damage:    a.  The faceplate on a 110 volt electrical outlet on the south wall was damaged and afforded access to live conductors.    b. Two 220 volt outlets on the north wall used to power welders were missing the plastic cover and live conductors were exposed.    c. One welder plug on the north wasll was damaged and plugged in to a live 220 volt outlet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1629.5
  • — Z (S) $3259

1910.305 B01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 15, 2017
Abate by
Jul 17, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(ii): Unused openings in boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not effectively closed:  On or about April 4, 2017 employees working in the welding room were exposed to electric shock hazards and the employer did not ensure that the 110 volt outlet box on the north wall was fully enclosed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Graham Welding, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342226040.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.