INDEPENDENCE, MO —
OSHA Inspection: ORBITAL ATK INC.
Unprogrammed Related inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related safety inspection of ORBITAL ATK INC. in 25201 E. 78 HWY, INDEPENDENCE, MO 64056 (NAICS 332993). OSHA activity number 342241148.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ORBITAL ATK INC.
- Site address
- 25201 E. 78 HWY
- City
- INDEPENDENCE
- State
- MO
- ZIP
- 64056
- Mailing
- PO BOX 1000 BLDG. 1 MZ, INDEPENDENCE, MO 64051
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Unprogrammed Related (G)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- A
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332993
- Employees
- 1500
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.119 D
- Issued
- Oct 2, 2017
- Abate by
- Feb 2, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $12,675 · Current $9,508 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(d): The employer did not complete a compilation of written process safety information, including information pertaining to the hazards of the highly hazardous chemicals used or produced by the process, information pertaining to the technology of the process, and information pertaining to the equipment in the process before conducting the process hazard analysis: The employer is failing to protect the employees form the hazard of explosion by failing complete a compilation of process safety information for the covered processes. This was most recently documented at 25201 East 78 Highway, Independence, Missouri when an employee was fatality injured while breaking up Tetrazene inside the vacuum receiver The process uses a spatula and the company failed to compile information on the material of construction and how this information may impact the use of the spatula with tetrazene.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $9508
- — C (S) $12675
- — Z (S) $12675
1910.119 E03
- Issued
- Oct 2, 2017
- Abate by
- Feb 2, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $12,675 · Current $9,506 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(e)(3): The process hazard analysis did not address the elements of (i) through (vii) of this paragraph: The following are examples of hazards not addressed in the Process Hazard Analysis: (a) Manipulating and transferring a full cloth of dried (Tetrazene) within the muslin cloth from the vacuum receiver to the weighing table without knowing the moisture content of the Tetrazene in . Transferring Tetrazene from the vacuum receiver to the weighing table without knowing whether the Tetrazene is within safe handling limits exposes high explosive mixers to explosion hazards. (b) The wedging action (using a spatula to break up the tetrazene cake in the dryer) utilized in the Tetrazene de-watering process was not addressed in the Process Hazard Analysis.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $9506
- — C (S) $12675
- — Z (S) $12675
1910.119 F01 I
- Issued
- Oct 2, 2017
- Abate by
- Feb 2, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $12,675 · Current $9,506 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(i): The employer did not develop and implement written operating procedures that provided clear instructions for safely conducting activities involved in each covered process consistent with the process safety information that addressed steps for each operating phase: The employer is failing to protect employees from the hazards of explosion and fire by failing to include all manufacturing steps within the Tetrazene standard operating procedure. This was most recently documented at 25201 E. 78 Hwy, Independence, Missouri when an employee was fatality injured while breaking up Tetrazene inside the vacuum receiver in . The following are examples of missing steps within the Tetrazene standard operating procedure: (a) Wedging steps were not provided for the high explosive mixers who break up Tetrazene, an explosive compound that is dried inside the vacuum receiver in . (b) Step by step instructions detailing how to safely transfer tetrazene the vacuum receiver to a conductive black plastic bag lining a rubber bucket or transferring the tetrazene from the black plastic bags to the vacuum receiver in were not provided.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $9506
- — C (S) $12675
- — Z (S) $12675
1910.119 F01 I D
- Issued
- Oct 2, 2017
- Abate by
- Feb 2, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $12,675 · Current $9,506 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(i)(D): The employer did not develop and implement written operating procedures that provide clear instructions for emergency shutdown, including the conditions under which emergency shutdown is required, and the assignment of shutdown responsibility to qualified operators to ensure that emergency shutdown is executed in a safe and timely manner: The employer is failing to protect employees from explosion and fire hazards by failing to provide emergency shutdown procedures in the Tetrazene operating procedure for the Tetrazene manufacturing process. This was most recently documented at 25201 E. 78 Hwy, Independence, Missouri. The company did not sufficiently develop and implement a Tetrazene Standard Operating Procedure, SOP Number procedures for emergency shutdown and when it would be required.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $9506
- — C (S) $12675
- — Z (S) $12675
1910.119 F01 I G
- Issued
- Oct 2, 2017
- Abate by
- Nov 20, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(i)(G): The employer did not develop and implement written operating procedures that provide clear instructions for safely conducting activities involved in each covered process consistent with the process safety information and did not address the startup following a turnaround, or after an emergency shutdown: The employer is failing to protect employees from explosion and fire hazards by failing to address and develop startup procedures following an emergency shutdown as part of the Standard Operating Procedures. This was most recently documented at 25201 East 78 Highway, Independence, Missouri, 85, bay 901.The company developed a Tetrazene Standard Operating Procedure, SOP Number 85A-11-2, which does not contain procedures for startup following an emergency shutdown.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.119 F01 II
- Issued
- Oct 2, 2017
- Abate by
- Feb 2, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $12,675 · Current $9,506 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(ii): The employer did not develop and implement written operating procedures that provided clear instructions for safely conducting activities involved in each covered process consistent with the process safety information that addressed operating limits: The employer is failing to protect employees from explosion and fire hazards by failing to address the safe operating limits, the consequences of deviating from the safe operating limits, or the steps to correct or avoid deviations for the Tetrazene manufacturing process in the Tetrazene standard operating procedure. This was most recently documented at 25201 East 78 Highway, Independence, Missouri, building 85, bay 901. The company developed a Tetrazene Standard Operating Procedure, SOP Number 85A-11-2, which does not contain safe operating limits, the consequence of deviating from the safe operating limits, or the steps to correct or avoid deviations.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $9506
- — C (S) $12675
- — Z (S) $12675
1910.119 F01 IV
- Issued
- Oct 2, 2017
- Abate by
- Feb 2, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $12,675 · Current $9,506 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(iv): The employer did not develop and implement written operating procedures providing clear instruction for safely conducting activities in each covered process consistent with the process safety information addressing safety systems and their functions: The employer is failing to protect employees from explosion and fire hazards by failing to outline the safety systems, their use, and function within the Standard Operating Procedure. This was most recently documented at 25201 East 78 Highway, Independence, Missouri,. The company developed a Tetrazene Standard Operating Procedure, SOP Number 85A-11-2, which does not address installed safety systems and their functions.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $9506
- — C (S) $12675
- — Z (S) $12675
More inspections at Orbital ATK INC.
View Orbital ATK INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332993)
More inspections in MO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342241148.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.