Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: API INVESTORS LLC

Follow-up inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a follow-up health inspection of API INVESTORS LLC in 1700 W MECHANIC ST, HARRISONVILLE, MO 64701 (NAICS 713990). OSHA activity number 342242336.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch API Investors LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for API Investors LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
API INVESTORS LLC
Site address
1700 W MECHANIC ST
City
HARRISONVILLE
State
MO
ZIP
64701
Mailing
1700 W MECHANIC ST, HARRISONVILLE, MO 64701
Inspection type
Follow-up (F)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
713990
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1025 M01 II

Repeat Gravity 10 6 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 20, 2017
Abate by
Oct 16, 2017
Penalty
Initial $8,366 · Current $8,366

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1910.1025(m)(1)(ii): In classifying the hazards of lead at least the following hazards are to be addressed: Reproductive/developmental toxicity; central nervous system effects; kidney effects; blood effects; and acute toxicity effects.  (a) The employer is failing to protect employees from lead-related hazards. This was most recently documented on or about April 12, 2017, when the employer failed to demonstrate that information classifying the hazards of lead, including reproductive/developmental toxicity; central nervous system effects; kidney effects; blood effects; and acute toxicity effects. In the employee restroom, on the sink faucet and handles, lead was present at 128.20 micrograms in a 100 square centimeter sample.   (b)The employer is failing to protect employees from lead-related hazards. This was most recently documented on or about April 12, 2017, when the employer failed to demonstrate that information classifying the hazards of lead, including reproductive/developmental toxicity; central nervous system effects; kidney effects; blood effects; and acute toxicity effects. On the counter inside the range office, lead was present at 94.67 micrograms in a 100 square centimeter sample.  (c) The employer is failing to protect employees from lead-related hazards. This was most recently documented on or about April 12, 2017, when the employer failed to demonstrate that information classifying the hazards of lead, including reproductive/developmental toxicity; central nervous system effects; kidney effects; blood effects; and acute toxicity effects. On a table in the range lobby, lead was present at 37.99 micrograms in a 100 square centimeter sample.  (d) The employer is failing to protect employees from lead-related hazards. This was most recently documented on or about April 12, 2017, when the employer failed to demonstrate that information classifying the hazards of lead, including reproductive/developmental toxicity; central nervous system effects; kidney effects; blood effects; and acute toxicity effects. On the kitchen counter, in front of the dish drying rack, lead was present at 31.05 micrograms in a 100 square centimeter sample.  (e) The employer is failing to protect employees from lead-related hazards. This was most recently documented on or about April 12, 2017, when the employer failed to demonstrate that information classifying the hazards of lead, including reproductive/developmental toxicity; central nervous system effects; kidney effects; blood effects; and acute toxicity effects. On the kitchen counter, in front of the coffee maker lead was present at 23.44 micrograms in a 100 square centimeter sample.  (f) The employer is failing to protect employees from lead-related hazards. This was most recently documented on or about April 12, 2017, when the employer failed to demonstrate that information classifying the hazards of lead, including reproductive/developmental toxicity; central nervous system effects; kidney effects; blood effects; and acute toxicity effects. In the employee restroom, on the light switch, lead was present at 19.90 micrograms in a 100 square centimeter sample.  The API Investors LLC was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1910.1025(m)(1)(ii), (which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1164970, citation number 1, item number 5a and was affirmed as a final order on December 23, 2016, with respect to a workplace located at 1700 W Mechanic Street, Harrisonville, Missouri 64701.  Abatement certification is required for this item; use the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET for this purpose.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (R) $8366

1910.1025 M01 III

Repeat Gravity 10 6 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 20, 2017
Abate by
Oct 16, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1910.1025(m)(1)(iii): Employers must include lead in the hazard communication program established to comply with the HCS (� 1910.1200). Employers must ensure that each employee has access to labels on containers of lead and to safety data sheets, and is trained in accordance with the requirements of HCS and paragraph (l) of this section:  (a) The employer is failing to protect employees from lead-related hazards. This was most recently documented on or about April 11, 2017, when the employer failed to demonstrate that each employee was trained in accordance with the requirements of the Hazard Communication standard and paragraph (l) of this section. In the employee restroom, on the sink faucet and handles, lead was present at 128.20 micrograms in a 100 square centimeter sample.   (b) The employer is failing to protect employees from lead-related hazards. This was most recently documented on or about April 11, 2017, when the employer failed to demonstrate that each employee was trained in accordance with the requirements of the Hazard Communication standard and paragraph (l) of this section. In the employee restroom, on the light switch, lead was present at 19.90 micrograms in a 100 square centimeter sample.  (c) The employer is failing to protect employees from lead-related hazards. This was most recently documented on or about April 11, 2017, when the employer failed to demonstrate that each employee was trained in accordance with the requirements of the Hazard Communication standard and paragraph (l) of this section. On a table in the range lobby, lead was present at 37.99 micrograms in a 100 square centimeter sample.  (d) The employer is failing to protect employees from lead-related hazards. This was most recently documented on or about April 11, 2017, when the employer failed to demonstrate that each employee was trained in accordance with the requirements of the Hazard Communication standard and paragraph (l) of this section. On the counter inside the range attendant's booth, lead was present at 94.67 micrograms in a 100 square centimeter sample.  (e) The employer is failing to protect employees from lead-related hazards. This was most recently documented on or about April 11, 2017, when the employer failed to demonstrate that each employee was trained in accordance with the requirements of the Hazard Communication standard and paragraph (l) of this section. On the kitchen counter, in front of the coffee maker lead was present at 23.44 micrograms in a 100 square centimeter sample.    (f) The employer is failing to protect employees from lead-related hazards. This was most recently documented on or about April 11, 2017, when the employer failed to demonstrate that each employee was trained in accordance with the requirements of the Hazard Communication standard and paragraph (l) of this section. On the kitchen counter, in front of the dish drying rack, lead was present at 31.05 micrograms in a 100 square centimeter sample.  The API Investors LLC was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1910.1025(m)(1)(iii), (which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1164970, citation number 1, item number 5b and was affirmed as a final order on December 23, 2016, with respect to a workplace located at 1700 W Mechanic Street, Harrisonville, Missouri 64701.  Abatement certification is required for this item; use the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET for this purpose.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (R) $0

View API Investors LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342242336.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.