LYTLE, TX —
OSHA Inspection: ZINFAB, LLC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ZINFAB, LLC in 19760 IH-35, LYTLE, TX 78052 (NAICS 238120). OSHA activity number 342280591.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ZINFAB, LLC
- Site address
- 19760 IH-35
- City
- LYTLE
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 78052
- Mailing
- 479 CO RD 473, CASTROVILLE, TX 78009
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238120
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 C02 IV
- Issued
- Jun 2, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,173 · Current $1,304 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(iv): Front-end loaders and similar pieces of equipment were used to support scaffold platforms when they were not specifically designed by the manufacturer for such use: West side: On or about April 27, 2017, employees were exposed to fall hazards, while using a temporary elevated work platform that was supported by a JLG SkyTrak forklift (Model: 8042), which was not designed as a personnel lifting device by the manufacturer.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1303.8
- — Z (S) $2173
1926.451 C02 V
- Issued
- Jun 2, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(v): Fork-lifts were used to support scaffold platforms while the entire platform is not attached to the fork or the fork-lift is moved horizontally while the platform is occupied: West Side: On or about April 27, 2017, employees were exposed to a fall hazards, when using a temporary elevated work platform supported by a JLG SkyTrak Forklift (Model: 8042), which was not securely attached to the forklift.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 G01 VII
- Issued
- Jun 2, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,173 · Current $1,304 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee was not protected by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of 29 CFR 1910.451: Westside: On or about April 27, 2017, employees were exposed to fall hazards, when using a temporary elevated work platform supported by a JLG SkyTrak Forklift (Model 8042) with the front side midrail out of position.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1303.8
- — Z (S) $2173
1926.501 B10
- Issued
- Jun 2, 2017
- Abate by
- Jun 19, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,173 · Current $1,304 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs, with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system: West side of building; On or about April 27, 2017, employees without fall protection were exposed to fall hazards greater than 6 feet to the unpaved ground below, while installing metal sheets on the roof of a commercial building.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1303.8
- — Z (S) $2173
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Jun 2, 2017
- Abate by
- Jun 22, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,173 · Current $1,304 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: On or about April 27, 2017, employees without fall protection were exposed to fall hazards greater than 6 feet to the unpaved ground below, while installing new metal sheets on the roof of a commercial building without being trained to recognize fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1303.8
- — Z (S) $2173
1926.1053 B05 I
- Issued
- Jun 2, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $1,630 · Current $978 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(5)(i): Non-self-supporting ladder was not used at an angle such than the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder way approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder (the distance along the ladder between the foot and the top support): Westside; On or about April 27, 2017, employees were exposed to fall hazards, while using a Werner extension ladder that was not set at a proper angle to gain access to a temporary elevated work platform.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $978
- — Z (S) $1630
More inspections at Zinfab, LLC
View Zinfab, LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238120)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342280591.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.