OSHA Inspection: ANTONIO MORENO

Issued

Sep 8, 2017

Abate by

Oct 18, 2017

Penalty

Initial $305 · Current $305

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:  On June 22, 2017, Antonio Moreno, was issued citations and the employer did not verify, through written certification that each citation was abated.  Abatement certification was not received for the following violations:            a.  Citation 1 Item 1a & b, and         b.  Citation 1 Item 2a & c, and         c.  Citation 1 Item 4b.

Issued

Sep 8, 2017

Abate by

Oct 18, 2017

Penalty

Initial $305 · Current $305

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.  On June 15, 2017, Antonio Moreno, was issued citations and the employer did not verify, through documents that each citation was abated.  Abatement documentation was not received for the following violations:                Citation 1 Item 3a - c.

Issued

Jun 22, 2017

Abate by

Jul 10, 2017

Penalty

Initial $2,716 · Current $2,716

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part:     On or about May 2, 2017, Employees were exposed to falls and struck by hazards on a construction site in Champaign, IL, and the employer did not have an effective safety and health program with specific work rules, competent person oversight, and employee training to govern employees activities.

Issued

Jun 22, 2017

Abate by

Jul 10, 2017

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s)     On or about May 2, 2017, Employees were exposed to falls and struck by hazards on a construction site in Champaign, IL, and the employer did not ensure a competent person inspected the job site for unsafe activity and took necessary steps to eliminate or control the hazards.

Issued

Jun 22, 2017

Abate by

Jul 10, 2017

Penalty

Initial $2,716 · Current $2,716

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury:     On or about May 2, 2017, Employees were exposed to struck-by hazards in the eye while using a pneumatic nail gun, on a construction site in Champaign, IL, and the employer had not instructed the employees in hazard recognition and the applicable regulations to their work environment.

Issued

Jun 22, 2017

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees shall be provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations present potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.    On or about May 2, 2017, Employees were exposed to struck-by hazards in the eye while using a pneumatic nail gun, on a construction site in Champaign, IL, and the employer did not ensure the use of eye protection.

Issued

Jun 22, 2017

Abate by

Jul 10, 2017

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.102(a)(3): The vision of employees requiring use of corrective lenses in spectacles was not protected by goggles or spectacles of one of the types listed in paragraphs (i) through (iii) of this section.    On or about May 2, 2017, An employee engaged in residential activities was exposed to a struck by hazard in the eye, while using a pneumatic nail gun on a construction site in Champaign, IL, and the employer did not ensure the employee was protected by goggles or spectacles with protective lenses.

Issued

Jun 22, 2017

Abate by

Jul 10, 2017

Penalty

Initial $3,803 · Current $3,803

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system.     On or about May 2, 2017, Employees were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 10ft., on a construction site in Champaign, IL, and the employer did not ensure employees were using fall protection.

Issued

Jun 22, 2017

Abate by

Jul 10, 2017

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:    On or about May 2, 2017, Employees were exposed to a fall hazard on a construction site in Champaign, IL, and the employer did not instructed the employees in hazard recognition and the applicable regulations to their work environment.

Issued

Jun 22, 2017

Abate by

Jul 10, 2017

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1):  The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written certification record containing the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employee:    On or about May 2, 2017, The employer did not maintain documentation of the required training for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards.  There was no written documentation that included the employees name, date of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employee.

Issued

Jun 22, 2017

Penalty

Initial $2,716 · Current $2,716

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access:    On or about May 2, 2017, Employees were exposed to a fall hazard, while accessing and exiting the work area via an extension ladder, on a construction site in Champaign, IL, and the employer did not ensure the extension ladder extended at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface.

Issued

Jun 22, 2017

Abate by

Jul 10, 2017

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards:    On or about May 2, 2017, Employees were exposed to a fall hazard, while accessing and exiting the work area via an extension ladder, on a construction site in Champaign, IL, and the employer did not provide training for each employee that would have enabled them to recognize the hazards and provided them with the procedures to follow to minimize these hazards.