Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,892Inspections Most recent open 2026-09-03 Last loaded 2026-09-07

OSHA Inspection: SKYLINE RESTORATION, INC.

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of SKYLINE RESTORATION, INC. in 8200 BOULEVARD EAST, NORTH BERGEN, NJ 07047 (NAICS 236220). OSHA activity number 342351772.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Skyline Restoration, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Skyline Restoration, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
8200 BOULEVARD EAST
City
NORTH BERGEN
State
NJ
ZIP
07047
Mailing
49-28 31ST PLACE, LONG ISLAND CITY, NY 11101
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236220
Employees
400
Ownership type
Private (A)

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Aug 17, 2017
Abate by
Sep 13, 2017
Penalty
Initial $12,675 · Current $7,500 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9010

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1) as referenced by 29 CFR 1926.59:  Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii), as referenced by 29 CFR 1926.59:    Worksite, 8200 Boulevard East, North Bergen, NJ    a)     Subcontractor employees did not implement a written hazard communication program for employees required to perform demolition of masonry concrete structures that contain silica and work with masonry chemicals that contain silica, including but not limited to Sika Quick, 1000 hardening mortar, Sika VOH vertical and overhead repoair mortar and Sika Armatec Bonding Agent.      Violation occurred on or about 5-26-17
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $7500
  • · C (S) $12675
  • · Z (S) $12675

1910.1200 G01

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Aug 17, 2017
Abate by
Sep 13, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9010

29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1) as referenced by 29 CFR 1926.59:  Employers did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use:   Worksite, 8200 Boulevard East, North Bergen, NJ  a)  The employer did not maintain safety data sheets for employees required to perform demolition of masonry concrete structures that contain silica and work with masonry chemicals that contain silica, including but not limited to SikaQuick 1000 hardening mortar, Sika VOH vertical and overhead repair mortar and Sika Armatec Bonding Agent.  Violation occurred on or about 5-26-17
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H03 II

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Aug 17, 2017
Abate by
Sep 13, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(ii) as referenced by 29 CFR 1926.59:  Employee training did not include the physical and health hazards of the chemicals in the work area:    Worksite, 8200 Boulevard East, North Bergen, NJ  a) The employer required employees  to perform demolition of masonry concrete structures that contain silica and work with masonry chemicals that contain silica, including but not limited to SikaQuick 1000 hardening mortar, Sika VOH vertical and overhead repair mortar and Sika Armatec Bonding Agent.  The employer did not train employees on the health hazards of silica.  Violation occurred on or about 5-26-17
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 C

Other-than-serious 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Aug 17, 2017
Abate by
Sep 13, 2017
Penalty
Initial $12,675 · Current $7,500 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9010

29 CFR 1910.134(c) as referenced by 29 CFR 1926.103:  The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program with required worksite-specific procedures and elements for required respirator use:    Worksite, 8200 Boulevard East, North Bergen, NJ      a) Subcontractor employers did not implement a written respiratory protection program for employees required to wear filtering facepiece and half mask negative pressure elastomeric respirators while performing demolition of masonry concrete structures with chipping hammers, masonry saws and grinders.  Subcontractor employees performing masonry demolition of concrete balcony structures in the vicinity of the 12th floor of Section G and 28th floor of Section C where exposed to crystalline silica at 51.20 mppcf (million particles per cubic foot) and 17.25 mppcf, respectively which were 4.13 and 1.38 times the permissible exposure limit of 12.38 mppcf and 12.5 mppcf.  Subcontractor workers were sampled on 5/26/17 for 431 minutes and 398 minutes, respectively with the unsampled time of 49 minutes and 82 minutes considered to represent zero for the exposure calculation.       Violation occurred on or about 5-26-17
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $7500
  • · C (S) $12675
  • · Z (S) $12675

1910.134 E01

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Aug 17, 2017
Abate by
Sep 13, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9010

29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1) as referenced by 29 CFR 1926.103:  The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: (Construction Reference 1926.103):  Worksite, 8200 Boulevard East, North Bergen, NJ    a) The employer did not provide the employees with medical evaluations for employees required to wear  filtering facepiece and half mask negative pressure elastomeric respirators while performing demolition of masonry concrete structures with chipping hammers, masonry saws and grinders.      Violation occurred on or about 5-26-17
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Aug 17, 2017
Abate by
Sep 13, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9010

29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1) as referenced by 29 CFR 1926.103:  The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):  Worksite, 8200 Boulevard East, North Bergen, NJ    a) The employer did not provide employees with fit tests when required to wear filtering facepiece and half mask negative pressure elastomeric respirators during demolition of masonry concrete structures with chipping hammers, masonry saws and grinders.      Violation occurred on or about 5-26-17
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 K03

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Aug 17, 2017
Abate by
Sep 13, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9010

29 CFR 1910.134(k)(3) as referenced by 29 CFR 1926.103:  The employer did not provide the training prior to requiring the employee to use a respirator in the workplace:  Worksite, 8200 Boulevard East, North Bergen, NJ    a) The employer failed to provide employees with respirator training to include but not limited to the correct donning, doffing, use and fit check of filtering facepiece and half mask negative pressure elastomeric respirators while performing demolition of masonry concrete structures with chipping hammers, masonry saws and grinders.      Violation occurred on or about 5-26-17
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.55 A

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 17, 2017
Abate by
Sep 13, 2017
Penalty
Initial $12,675 · Current $0 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9010

29 CFR 1926.55(a): Employee(s) were exposed to material(s) at concentrations above those specified in the Threshold Limit Values of Airborne Contaminants for 1970 of the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists:  Worksite, 8200 Boulevard East, North Bergen, NJ    a) An employee performing masonry demolition of concrete balcony structures in the vicinity of the 12th floor of Section G of the building was exposed to crystalline silica at 51.20  mppcf (million particles per cubic foot) which was 4.13  times the permissible exposure limit of 12.38 mppcf.  The time sampled was 431 minutes.  Zero exposure was assumed for the 49 minutes that were not sampled.  b)  An employee performing masonry demolition of concrete balcony structures in the vicinity of 28th floor of Section  C of the building was  exposed to crystalline silica at 17.25  mppcf of (million particles per cubic foot) which was 1.38  times the permissible exposure limit of 12.5 mppcf.  The time sampled was 398 minutes.  Zero exposure was assumed for the 82 minutes that were not sampled.  Violation occurred on 5-26-17
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $12675
  • · Z (S) $12675

1926.55 B

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 17, 2017
Abate by
Sep 13, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9010

29 CFR 1926.55(b): Feasible administrative or engineering controls were not implemented to reduce employee exposures:  Worksite, 8200 Boulevard East, North Bergen, NJ  a) An employee performing masonry demolition of concrete balcony structures in the vicinity of the 12th floor of Section G of the building was exposed to crystalline silica at 51.20  mppcf (million particles per cubic foot) which was 4.13  times the permissible exposure limit of 12.38 mppcf.  The time sampled was 431 minutes.  Zero exposure was assumed for the 49 minutes that were not sampled.  b)  An employee performing masonry demolition of concrete balcony structures in the vicinity of 28th floor of Section  C of the building was  exposed to crystalline silica at 17.25  mppcf of (million particles per cubic foot) which was 1.38  times the permissible exposure limit of 12.5 mppcf.  The time sampled was 398 minutes.  Zero exposure was assumed for the 82 minutes that were not sampled.  Violation occurred on 5-26-17
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

View Skyline Restoration, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342351772.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.