NORTH BERGEN, NJ ·
OSHA Inspection: SKYLINE RESTORATION, INC.
Referral inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of SKYLINE RESTORATION, INC. in 8200 BOULEVARD EAST, NORTH BERGEN, NJ 07047 (NAICS 236220). OSHA activity number 342351772.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SKYLINE RESTORATION, INC.
- Site address
- 8200 BOULEVARD EAST
- City
- NORTH BERGEN
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 07047
- Mailing
- 49-28 31ST PLACE, LONG ISLAND CITY, NY 11101
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236220
- Employees
- 400
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Aug 17, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 13, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $12,675 · Current $7,500 Reduced
9010
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1) as referenced by 29 CFR 1926.59: Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii), as referenced by 29 CFR 1926.59: Worksite, 8200 Boulevard East, North Bergen, NJ a) Subcontractor employees did not implement a written hazard communication program for employees required to perform demolition of masonry concrete structures that contain silica and work with masonry chemicals that contain silica, including but not limited to Sika Quick, 1000 hardening mortar, Sika VOH vertical and overhead repoair mortar and Sika Armatec Bonding Agent. Violation occurred on or about 5-26-17
Recent events (3)
- · F (O) $7500
- · C (S) $12675
- · Z (S) $12675
1910.1200 G01
- Issued
- Aug 17, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 13, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9010
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1) as referenced by 29 CFR 1926.59: Employers did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use: Worksite, 8200 Boulevard East, North Bergen, NJ a) The employer did not maintain safety data sheets for employees required to perform demolition of masonry concrete structures that contain silica and work with masonry chemicals that contain silica, including but not limited to SikaQuick 1000 hardening mortar, Sika VOH vertical and overhead repair mortar and Sika Armatec Bonding Agent. Violation occurred on or about 5-26-17
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H03 II
- Issued
- Aug 17, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 13, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(ii) as referenced by 29 CFR 1926.59: Employee training did not include the physical and health hazards of the chemicals in the work area: Worksite, 8200 Boulevard East, North Bergen, NJ a) The employer required employees to perform demolition of masonry concrete structures that contain silica and work with masonry chemicals that contain silica, including but not limited to SikaQuick 1000 hardening mortar, Sika VOH vertical and overhead repair mortar and Sika Armatec Bonding Agent. The employer did not train employees on the health hazards of silica. Violation occurred on or about 5-26-17
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.134 C
- Issued
- Aug 17, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 13, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $12,675 · Current $7,500 Reduced
9010
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c) as referenced by 29 CFR 1926.103: The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program with required worksite-specific procedures and elements for required respirator use: Worksite, 8200 Boulevard East, North Bergen, NJ a) Subcontractor employers did not implement a written respiratory protection program for employees required to wear filtering facepiece and half mask negative pressure elastomeric respirators while performing demolition of masonry concrete structures with chipping hammers, masonry saws and grinders. Subcontractor employees performing masonry demolition of concrete balcony structures in the vicinity of the 12th floor of Section G and 28th floor of Section C where exposed to crystalline silica at 51.20 mppcf (million particles per cubic foot) and 17.25 mppcf, respectively which were 4.13 and 1.38 times the permissible exposure limit of 12.38 mppcf and 12.5 mppcf. Subcontractor workers were sampled on 5/26/17 for 431 minutes and 398 minutes, respectively with the unsampled time of 49 minutes and 82 minutes considered to represent zero for the exposure calculation. Violation occurred on or about 5-26-17
Recent events (3)
- · F (O) $7500
- · C (S) $12675
- · Z (S) $12675
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Aug 17, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 13, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9010
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1) as referenced by 29 CFR 1926.103: The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: (Construction Reference 1926.103): Worksite, 8200 Boulevard East, North Bergen, NJ a) The employer did not provide the employees with medical evaluations for employees required to wear filtering facepiece and half mask negative pressure elastomeric respirators while performing demolition of masonry concrete structures with chipping hammers, masonry saws and grinders. Violation occurred on or about 5-26-17
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.134 F01
- Issued
- Aug 17, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 13, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9010
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1) as referenced by 29 CFR 1926.103: The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT): Worksite, 8200 Boulevard East, North Bergen, NJ a) The employer did not provide employees with fit tests when required to wear filtering facepiece and half mask negative pressure elastomeric respirators during demolition of masonry concrete structures with chipping hammers, masonry saws and grinders. Violation occurred on or about 5-26-17
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.134 K03
- Issued
- Aug 17, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 13, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9010
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(3) as referenced by 29 CFR 1926.103: The employer did not provide the training prior to requiring the employee to use a respirator in the workplace: Worksite, 8200 Boulevard East, North Bergen, NJ a) The employer failed to provide employees with respirator training to include but not limited to the correct donning, doffing, use and fit check of filtering facepiece and half mask negative pressure elastomeric respirators while performing demolition of masonry concrete structures with chipping hammers, masonry saws and grinders. Violation occurred on or about 5-26-17
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.55 A
- Issued
- Aug 17, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 13, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $12,675 · Current $0 Reduced
9010
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.55(a): Employee(s) were exposed to material(s) at concentrations above those specified in the Threshold Limit Values of Airborne Contaminants for 1970 of the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists: Worksite, 8200 Boulevard East, North Bergen, NJ a) An employee performing masonry demolition of concrete balcony structures in the vicinity of the 12th floor of Section G of the building was exposed to crystalline silica at 51.20 mppcf (million particles per cubic foot) which was 4.13 times the permissible exposure limit of 12.38 mppcf. The time sampled was 431 minutes. Zero exposure was assumed for the 49 minutes that were not sampled. b) An employee performing masonry demolition of concrete balcony structures in the vicinity of 28th floor of Section C of the building was exposed to crystalline silica at 17.25 mppcf of (million particles per cubic foot) which was 1.38 times the permissible exposure limit of 12.5 mppcf. The time sampled was 398 minutes. Zero exposure was assumed for the 82 minutes that were not sampled. Violation occurred on 5-26-17
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $12675
- · Z (S) $12675
1926.55 B
- Issued
- Aug 17, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 13, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9010
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.55(b): Feasible administrative or engineering controls were not implemented to reduce employee exposures: Worksite, 8200 Boulevard East, North Bergen, NJ a) An employee performing masonry demolition of concrete balcony structures in the vicinity of the 12th floor of Section G of the building was exposed to crystalline silica at 51.20 mppcf (million particles per cubic foot) which was 4.13 times the permissible exposure limit of 12.38 mppcf. The time sampled was 431 minutes. Zero exposure was assumed for the 49 minutes that were not sampled. b) An employee performing masonry demolition of concrete balcony structures in the vicinity of 28th floor of Section C of the building was exposed to crystalline silica at 17.25 mppcf of (million particles per cubic foot) which was 1.38 times the permissible exposure limit of 12.5 mppcf. The time sampled was 398 minutes. Zero exposure was assumed for the 82 minutes that were not sampled. Violation occurred on 5-26-17
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections at Skyline Restoration, INC.
View Skyline Restoration, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236220)
More inspections in NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342351772.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.