Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,991Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-24 Last loaded 2026-08-27

OSHA Inspection: PECO ENERGY COMPANY

Fatality or catastrophe inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a fatality or catastrophe safety inspection of PECO ENERGY COMPANY in 737 BERWOOD LN., BRYN MAWR, PA 19010 (NAICS 221122). OSHA activity number 342435526.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Peco Energy Company for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Peco Energy Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
PECO ENERGY COMPANY
Site address
737 BERWOOD LN.
City
BRYN MAWR
State
PA
ZIP
19010
Mailing
2301 MARKET STREET, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103
Inspection type
Fatality or catastrophe (M)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
221122
Employees
193
Ownership type
Private (A)

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.269 L01 III

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2017
Abate by
Dec 26, 2017
Penalty
Initial $12,675 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.269(l)(1)(iii): Electric lines and equipment were not considered and treated as energized or had otherwise been deenergized in accordance with paragraph (d) or (m) of this section:  a) Jobsite: PECO Pole# 2802 - The employer did not ensure an employee repairing an energized, downed 13.2 kv primary line treated the primary line as energized prior to working on it.  Noted on or about 6/21/17.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $12675
  • · Z (S) $12675

1910.269 L03 III

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2017
Abate by
Dec 26, 2017
Penalty
Initial $12,675 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.269(l)(3)(iii): The employer did not ensure that no employee approached or took any conductive object closer to exposed energized parts than the employer's established minimum approach distance, unless provisions described in (l) (3) (iii) (A) - (C) were followed:   a) Jobsite: PECO Pole# 2802 - The employer did not ensure an employee repairing an energized, downed 13.2 kv primary line did not approach closer than their established minimum approach distance unless the requirements of 1910.269(l)(3)(iii)(A)-(C) were met.  Noted on or about 6/21/17
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $12675
  • · Z (S) $12675

1910.269 L05 II

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2017
Abate by
Dec 26, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.269(l)(5)(ii):  Employees who perform work near exposed parts energized at more than 600 volts, but not more than 72.5 kilovolts, and who are not wearing rubber insulating gloves, being protected by insulating equipment covering the energized parts, performing work using live-line tools, or performing live-line barehand work under paragraph (q)(3) of this section, did not work from a position where he or she could not reach into the minimum approach distance, established by the employer under paragraph (l)(3)(i) of this section:  a) Jobsite: PECO Pole# 2802 - The employer did not ensure an employee repairing an energized, downed 13.2 kv primary line worked from a position where he could not reach into the minimum approach distance unless the requirements of 1910.269(l)(3)(iii)(A)-(C) were met.  Noted on or about 6/21/17.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.269 L04 II A

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2017
Abate by
Dec 26, 2017
Penalty
Initial $12,675 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.269(l)(4)(ii)(A): The employer did not ensure that employees who use rubber gloves or rubber insulating gloves and sleeves as insulation from energized parts put on the rubber insulating gloves and sleeves in a position where he or she cannot reach into the minimum approach distance, established by the employer under paragraph (l)(3)(i) of this section:  a) Jobsite: PECO Pole# 2802 - The employer did not ensure an employee used and put on rubber insulating gloves and sleeves where he could not reach into the minimum approach distance while repairing an energized 13.2kv downed primary line.  Noted on or about 6/21/17.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $12675
  • · Z (S) $12675

View Peco Energy Company's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342435526.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.