CONCORD, NH —
OSHA Inspection: LDL CONSTRUCTION LLC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of LDL CONSTRUCTION LLC in 77 PILLSBURY STREET, CONCORD, NH 03301 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 342489077.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- LDL CONSTRUCTION LLC
- Site address
- 77 PILLSBURY STREET
- City
- CONCORD
- State
- NH
- ZIP
- 03301
- Mailing
- 598 PLEASANT STREET #1, BROCKTON, MA 02301
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- May 8, 2018
- Abate by
- May 25, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $311 · Current $311
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section: a. The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 1, nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent March 28, 2017. b. The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 2, nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent March 28, 2017. c. The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 3, nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent March 28, 2017. d. The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 4a, nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent March 28, 2017. e. The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 4b, nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent March 28, 2017. f. The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 4c nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent March 28, 2017.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $311
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Aug 9, 2017
- Abate by
- Aug 15, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,803 · Current $3,803
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems or personal fall arrest systems: (a) Roof - Employees were exposed to a fall hazard while working on a steep roof without fall protection.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3803
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Aug 9, 2017
- Abate by
- Aug 15, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,803 · Current $3,803
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: (a) Jobsite - Employees were not trained in the use of fall protection.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3803
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Aug 9, 2017
- Abate by
- Aug 15, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,803 · Current $3,803
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: (a) Roof - The ladder used to access the roof did not extend three feet above the roof's eve.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3803
1926.1053 A01 I
- Issued
- Aug 9, 2017
- Abate by
- Aug 15, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $2,716
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(a)(1)(i): Extra-heavy-duty type 1A metal or plastic self-supporting portable ladders were not capable of supporting, without failure, at least 3.3 times the maximum intended load: (a) Jobsite - The RGC Power Hoist was not a 1A Extra-Heavy Duty ladder.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2716
1926.1053 B04
- Issued
- Aug 9, 2017
- Abate by
- Aug 15, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladders were used for purposes other than the purpose for which they were designed: a) Jobsite - The RGC Power Hoist ladder was used to access the roof.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B09
- Issued
- Aug 9, 2017
- Abate by
- Aug 15, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(9): The area around the top and bottom of ladders was not kept clear: (a) Jobsite - The area at the bottom of the RGC Power ladder was blocked by the hoist and trash.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at LDL Construction LLC
View LDL Construction LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in NH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342489077.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.